I Should Have an AR-15, but not YOU! Gun grabber speaks honestly

[Dagosa]

No liar, making them prohibitively expensive did that. Stop lying ya commie enemy of the state.

Let’s do the same with assault weapons then.

 

[AMart]

Let’s do the same with assault weapons then.

The law banning full auto is unconstitutional and trying to do that with semi auto ARs would be the same.

 

[2aguy]

It’s intended use was as a military weapon. Stoner would be flabbergasted that they are now in the hands of civilians. We ought to start suing companies that knowingly make them so available, they ultimately get placed in the hands of mass murderer s and are the choice for those intent on killing children and shooting into crowds.

Moron......

The FOIA request itself was prompted from a Nov. 2017 article in The Atlantic in which the magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that “these rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.”

“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,”

one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”





Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

 

[2aguy]

“The AR-15 was developed specifically as a military weapon to replace the M-14. It was probably one of the first major weapons systems to be privately developed following the DOD's decision to privatize the design and development function. This function had heretofore been carried out by publicly funded government operations, most notably, in the case of military small arms, the Springield Arsenal.”
It was never intended for the AR15 to be used by civilians. Article of former Colt engineer ....

Why the AR-15 Was Never Meant to be in Civilians' Hands

A former Colt Firearms engineer explains the origin of the semi-automatic rifle.

www.theatlantic.com

Then why was it put on the civilian market....you dumb ass....years before being adopted, first changed, for the military....?

“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,”

one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

 

[Dagosa]

The law banning full auto is unconstitutional and trying to do that with semi auto ARs would be the same.

Another expert, 80 years too late. You “ experts” are hilarious.

 

[AMart]

Then why was it put on the civilian market....you dumb ass....years before being adopted, first changed, for the military....?

“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,”

one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

That guy Dagosa Ragu Raviloli is an idiot. Just because something might have been designed for military purposes doesn't make it illegal. If that were the case you couldn't have a 4 wheel Jeep, MREs or BDU Camo pants.

 

[2aguy]

That guy Dagosa Ragu Raviloli is an idiot. Just because something might have been designed for military purposes doesn't make it illegal. If that were the case you couldn't have a 4 wheel Jeep, MREs or BDU Camo pants.

And as I point out....there are 24 million of them in private hands and only a few are used for crime each year........and if the criminals didn't use those few rifles, they would use different rifles or shotguns........and even then, knives are still used to murder more people than all rifles combined...

 

[miketx]

That guy Dagosa Ragu Raviloli is an idiot. Just because something might have been designed for military purposes doesn't make it illegal. If that were the case you couldn't have a 4 wheel Jeep, MREs or BDU Camo pants.

An America hating gun banning lying idiot! I nailed his sorry hide when I posted several images of rifles that do the same thing an AR does and asked him what about all those? Nothing but spin lies and deflection after that! Typical left actions. Hell these guns do the same thing an ar does:

 

[Dagosa]

That guy Dagosa Ragu Raviloli is an idiot. Just because something might have been designed for military purposes doesn't make it illegal. If that were the case you couldn't have a 4 wheel Jeep, MREs or BDU Camo pants.

Oh, so now you acknowledge it was designed for military purposes. Cause if you ever bothered to read anthing, that’s what the posts were about. One of your uninformed claimed it (AR15) was first designed as a civilian firearm. So you all are wrong. Stoner and company at Armorlite designed it specifically as a military firearm and as my later references dictated, a primary engineer thinks it should never have been put in the civilian market.

 

[Dagosa]

An America hating gun banning lying idiot! I nailed his sorry hide when I posted several images of rifles that do the same thing an AR does and asked him what about all those? Nothing but spin lies and deflection after that? Typical left actions. Hell these guns do the same thing an ar doesl

So your own kind has abandon you. They concede the AR15 was designed to be a military firearm. Even your buds know you’re FOS.

 

[Dagosa]

Come get them commie. Only thing needing to be addressed is you vermin.

You tell’m Texass hole.

 

[AMart]

Oh, so now you acknowledge it was designed for military purposes. Cause if you ever bothered to read anthing, that’s what the posts were about. One of your uninformed claimed it (AR15) was first designed as a civilian firearm. So you all are wrong. Stoner and company at Armorlite designed it specifically as a military firearm and as my later references dictated, a primary engineer thinks it should never have been put in the civilian market.

Nope. Armalite was founded and designed the first ARs before they sold out to Colt, who then got the first contract to supply the military

 

[Uncensored2008]

It’s difficult to take idiots seriously.

That's why no one takes you seriously.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Let’s do the same with assault weapons then.

Assault Weapon and full auto mean the same thing.

You're not the sharpest marshmallow in the bag.

 

[there4eyeM]

The AR 15 is an assault weapon without auto-fire feature.

 

[there4eyeM]

Not all auto-fire weapons are assault rifles.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not all auto-fire weapons are assault rifles.

What is an "auto-fire" weapon? One that shoots itself without human intervention?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The AR 15 is an assault weapon without auto-fire feature.

Like a donkey cart is a Ferrari without an engine feature.

I mean, a donkey cart has wheels..

 

[2aguy]

The AR 15 is an assault weapon without auto-fire feature.

Wrong…..assault weapon is a term created
By anti-gun fanatics to push gun control

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wrong…..assault weapon is a term created
By anti-gun fanatics to push gun control

The attempt is to dissuade the view that guns are generally a defensive weapon.