ARVNs carried Garands and the average ARVN soldier was barely five foot and weighed under a hundred twenty pounds. I carried a Garand in high school ROTC and I was six two and only weighed one sixty. Audie Murphy carried one on WWII and he was a real runt that was refused enlistment for being too small and underweight more than once. A 7.62mm battle rifle is easier to use than a 30.06, .303 or 7.92mm one like those widely used in WWII.Ha ha
You’re hilarious. You’re ridiculous Garands aren’t used by topical low life sissy boy mass shooters. They’re too much firearm for them to handle.
You mean “external“ ballistics. Another fake expert.
Took you forever to find someone who also delves in fake news…..”external” BallisticsNo, dumbass, I mean EXTERIOR BALLISTICS!
When you develop a brain, feel free to come back. Till then take your lesson like a man and shut the fuck up!
A. DEFINITION OF BALLISTICS
1. The science of the motion of projectile.
B. DIVIDED INTO FOUR BRANCHES
1. Interior ballistics is the branch of the science that deals with the projectile while it is still in the gun.
2. Transitional ballistics is the branch of the science that deals with the motion of the projectile from the time it leaves the muzzle until the only forces acting upon it are due to exterior ballistics.
3. Exterior ballistics is the branch of the science that deals with the projectile after it clears the muzzle and throughout its time of flight.
4. Terminal ballistics is that branch of the science that deals with the impact, and force imparted on the target.
So you’re saying AR15 devotees are even more a sissy boy then we thought ? I’ll buy that.ARVNs carried Garands and the average ARVN soldier was barely five foot and weighed under a hundred twenty pounds. I carried a Garand in high school ROTC and I was six two and only weighed one sixty. Audie Murphy carried one on WWII and he was a real runt that was refused enlistment for being too small and underweight more than once. A 7.62mm battle rifle is easier to use than a 30.06, .303 or 7.92mm one like those widely used in WWII.
I cannot imagine a reason why someone woulds not have him on ignore.Yeah, you are. You don't know shit about anything. So you try and bullshit your way along.
You are a typical fascist piece of shit.
Took you forever to find someone who also delves in fake news…..”external” Ballistics
Video Library From Barrel to Target External ballistics deals with the performance of Hornady bullets from the moment they exit the barrel until the moment they arrive at the target. We are not concerned with internal ballistics, the province o...www.hornady.com
But continual response from an idiot make believe authority is typical.
I cannot imagine a reason why someone woulds not have him on ignore.
Even if I agrreed with him, I'd not want to see him continually embarass himself.
Wow, sounds like you’re really upset. My job is done.Wow, I posted up a scientific treatise, written by ballisticians, and you post up a reloading manual that is written for a 5th grader.
And it took you TWO days!
Nobody is calling for an insurrection, either. Stop lying.‘Some members of the tinfoil hat brigade have come up with the reply, “We need these weapons because we want to be effective against the government if it becomes tyrannical. That’s part of our Second Amendment right.” Personally, I think that’s ludicrous, but it has become an increasingly popular justification for purchasing a semi-automatic rifle.’ ibid
It is tinfoil hat Red Dawn nonsense.
There’s nothing in the history, text, or case law of the Second Amendment that authorizes insurrectionist dogma.
No one ‘needs’ an AR 15, it’s a want – and that’s fine; if someone wants to possess an AR 15, he should be allowed to do to.
But don’t try to ‘justify’ possessing an AR 15 as some sort of a ‘need’ – it’s not.
Really ? You think you can defend yourself vs a swat team with your AR15 ? Seriously, you have to be joking. The govt has 2 things that you and your AR15 don’t have that makes your assertions unreal…..they have support personnel and infrastructure ……plus, you can lose your freedom, job, health insurance, private insurance etc by putting up any resistance to law enforcement.Yes, very true.
The author of that article was talking about AR15s being likely to penetrate walls and harm a family member or apartment neighbor, which people who actually understand guns are well aware of. Alone in an isolated house, I would prefer a short barreled AR15 with collapsing stock for home defense. In the 'burbs, I have a shotgun with a pistol holster on the butt for home defense.
I use a .380 for carry, having switched from a J-frame .38. I've seen studies showing that this is the most likely caliber to fully disable an attacker, to which I attribute the relative ease of a double tap.
I actually don't have an AR15 yet. I need to get one. A liberal poster convinced me (without meaning to) that I have a duty to have a semi-auto rifle with detachable magazine, in case the government goes full on authoritarian.
Irrelevant. The .223 is less stable and may not have the guaranteed penetration if tumbling as a more stable fmj 9mm through sheet rock….The moron that wrote the op-ed also lied when he claimed that a 223 round has more penetration than a 9mm. That's bullshit