Zone1 I repent of saying certain things about prominent liberals

Life beginning at conception is literally what embryology textbooks teach.

When do you believe life begins and why?
Perhaps it would be better to be more precise. When you say life, do you mean a distinct separate person, or just any living cells? A fertilized egg is certainly alive, but is more accurately considered just another part of an existing person. Do you consider an appendectomy to be murder? That kills living cells too.
 
Life beginning at conception is literally what embryology textbooks teach.
That is exactly not the case. Life began billions of years ago and has never stopped. If you mean a single cell with a unique combination of DNA, then yes, that began at conception.

When do you believe life begins and why?
If you mean a unique human being, that is something very different, IMHO. What makes us human is not our DNA but our minds so once we have a functioning brain, we deserve the title of human.
 
Perhaps it would be better to be more precise. When you say life, do you mean a distinct separate person, or just any living cells? A fertilized egg is certainly alive, but is more accurately considered just another part of an existing person. Do you consider an appendectomy to be murder? That kills living cells too.
A new, genetically distinct, living, human being. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Conception is the beginning of the human life cycle which ends at death. Every step along that continuum is fully human and possesses the appropriate attributes for that stage in its life cycle. That's what the science shows.
 
That is exactly not the case. Life began billions of years ago and has never stopped. If you mean a single cell with a unique combination of DNA, then yes, that began at conception.


If you mean a unique human being, that is something very different, IMHO. What makes us human is not our DNA but our minds so once we have a functioning brain, we deserve the title of human.
I meant exactly what I wrote. Life beginning at conception is literally what embryology textbooks teach. Or do you believe embryology textbooks are teaching how life began on earth instead of how and when human life begins?

You need to rationalize abortion doesn't end a human life. I don't. The logical conclusion of your argument is that if you believed abortion ended a human life, you wouldn't support it.
 
I meant exactly what I wrote. Life beginning at conception is literally what embryology textbooks teach. Or do you believe embryology textbooks are teaching how life began on earth instead of how and when human life begins?
I'm pretty sure those textbooks say the egg and sperm are both alive, even before fertilization.

You need to rationalize abortion doesn't end a human life. I don't. The logical conclusion of your argument is that if you believed abortion ended a human life, you wouldn't support it.
  • Wars end human lives but there are some wars I support. Do you?
  • A brain-dead, coma patient is alive by your definition. I would support ending efforts to keep that patient alive. Do you?
  • Some crimes are so horrendous they deserve the death penalty so I support it in some cases. Do you?
  • I believe the intrinsic value of a unique combination of chemicals is very small so I can support removing a fertilized egg from an adult that doesn't want it. Do you?
 
I meant exactly what I wrote. Life beginning at conception is literally what embryology textbooks teach. Or do you believe embryology textbooks are teaching how life began on earth instead of how and when human life begins?

You need to rationalize abortion doesn't end a human life. I don't. The logical conclusion of your argument is that if you believed abortion ended a human life, you wouldn't support it.
When do you think sentience is present
 
Yeh, I have pondered this kind of thing often. Why did God give us such freedom that we can even.. do what that Robinson guy did, messing up his life as well as Kirk's family's life (allegedly it was him anyhow)?

But it is what it is. We have to accept God unconditionally, as He accepts us that way (as long as we ditch egregious sin and preferably all sin).

I've had moments in which I was very impatient with God (long story why) but then the thought occurred to me that He has had almost endless patience with me (especially years ago when I wasn't exactly thinking about His ways or His Church, etc).

I think subconsciously, I have often tried to change God! LOL

That thought didn't do much for me... so I ditched it... but it still resurfaces at times.
Challenging God is all throughout the Bible, such as Moses challenging God to spare the Hebrew people from their actions and Jacob literally wrestling with God in hand to hand combat. In fact, the term "Israel" means to wrestle with God.

The name "Israel" means "to wrestle with God". This name was given to Jacob after he wrestled with an angel, symbolizing the struggle between humanity and the divine. Specifically, it translates to "he struggles with God" (Genesis 32:28) and reflects the spiritual journey of questioning and grappling with faith

In fact, I am not sure how someone can walk in true faith and not wrestle in similar fashion at some point.

Even Jesus prayed to spare him the cross, and he got no response.
 
I'm pretty sure those textbooks say the egg and sperm are both alive, even before fertilization.
Maybe look at the characteristics of living things. Because they aren't living beings. Your grasping at straws only further proves that if you believed they were human beings then you wouldn't support ending their life. You have literally constructed a straw man argument for the express purposes of rationalizing your position. Which is totally unnecessary as all you have to do is to take the position that you support ending their lives despite the inherent unfairness. But you can't because that's how strong the concept of fairness is hardwired into you. So you construct ridiculous arguments to avoid having to deal with your guilt.
 
  • Wars end human lives but there are some wars I support. Do you?
  • A brain-dead, coma patient is alive by your definition. I would support ending efforts to keep that patient alive. Do you?
  • Some crimes are so horrendous they deserve the death penalty so I support it in some cases. Do you?
  • I believe the intrinsic value of a unique combination of chemicals is very small so I can support removing a fertilized egg from an adult that doesn't want it. Do you?
You are proving my point. The concept of fairness is so hardwired into you that you can't take unfair positions. Every position you take you have rationalized as being fair.
 
When do you think sentience is present
It doesn't enter into the equation. That's just a convenient excuse for you to avoid the reality that abortion ends a human life. Just admit that abortion literally ends a human life and you are OK with that. Stop trying to morally justify your position.
 
You are proving my point. The concept of fairness is so hardwired into you that you can't take unfair positions. Every position you take you have rationalized as being fair.
How is removal of a zygote different than countless spontaneous abortions. 20% of all clinically recognized pregnancies end in spontaneous abortion. That doesn't include the countless unrecognized pregnancies that suddenly end.
 
It doesn't enter into the equation. That's just a convenient excuse for you to avoid the reality that abortion ends a human life. Just admit that abortion literally ends a human life and you are OK with that. Stop trying to morally justify your position.
Without sentience, it's not a human life any more than what is expelled each month.
 
Maybe look at the characteristics of living things. Because they aren't living beings. Your grasping at straws only further proves that if you believed they were human beings then you wouldn't support ending their life.
You may see a fundamental difference between a fertilized and unfertilized egg but it is just an arbitrary difference to me. I listed several examples of my willingness to kill human beings, what makes you think killing a fertilized egg would give me any grief?

You have literally constructed a straw man argument for the express purposes of rationalizing your position. Which is totally unnecessary as all you have to do is to take the position that you support ending their lives despite the inherent unfairness. But you can't because that's how strong the concept of fairness is hardwired into you. So you construct ridiculous arguments to avoid having to deal with your guilt.
You are proving my point. The concept of fairness is so hardwired into you that you can't take unfair positions. Every position you take you have rationalized as being fair.
You're projecting your issues onto me. As an atheist I have no expectation of fairness in this world. You believe in a higher power that establishes fairness, I do not.
 
You may see a fundamental difference between a fertilized and unfertilized egg but it is just an arbitrary difference to me. I listed several examples of my willingness to kill human beings, what makes you think killing a fertilized egg would give me any grief?



You're projecting your issues onto me. As an atheist I have no expectation of fairness in this world. You believe in a higher power that establishes fairness, I do not.
fairness is a lofty goal, but not always expected.
 
God explicitly said thou shalt not murder so there is no guessing. He never gave a commandment about abortion so that is only YOUR opinion.
Right! The command is "thou shall not murder".

Jesus said "Satan was a murderer from the beginning" even though he literally didn't commit homicide. What Satan did is what Christians do. They defy the commands of God, which results in their own demise, and teach others to do the same, which amounts to intentional murder. They are against aborting pregnancies but are all for surgically removing the brains of their own children and teaching them to defy the Law of God and sin religiously.

Condemning their children to suffer without life in complete darkness and confusion separated from God in hell.

Hypocrites!
 
Last edited:
How is removal of a zygote different than countless spontaneous abortions. 20% of all clinically recognized pregnancies end in spontaneous abortion. That doesn't include the countless unrecognized pregnancies that suddenly end.
Premeditation.

It's funny that you have to refer to it is "removal of a zygote." So telling.
 
15th post
Without sentience, it's not a human life any more than what is expelled each month.
You need to learn some science rather than making up capricious and arbitrary standards to assuage your guilt.

"After fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being...[this] is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence...." - Dr Jerome LeJeune, Professor of Genetics at the University of Descartes, Paris, discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down's Syndrome, and Nobel Prize Winner, Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981

"An individual human life begins at conception when a sperm cell from the father fuses with an egg cell from the mother, to form a new cell, the zygote, the first embryonic stage. The zygote grows and divides into two daughter cells, each of which grows and divides into two grand-daughter cells, and this cell growth/division process continues on, over and over again. The zygote is the start of a biological continuum that automatically grows and develops, passing gradually and sequentially through the stages we call foetus, baby, child, adult, old person and ending eventually in death. The full genetic instructions to guide the development of the continuum, in interaction with its environment, are present in the zygote. Every stage along the continuum is biologically human and each point along the continuum has the full human properties appropriate to that point."
Dr. William Reville, University College Cork, Ireland
 
You may see a fundamental difference between a fertilized and unfertilized egg but it is just an arbitrary difference to me. I listed several examples of my willingness to kill human beings, what makes you think killing a fertilized egg would give me any grief?
You are the one being arbitrary, not me.

The literal difference is one is an egg and the other is a zygote which is a new, genetically distinct human being.

If you had argued that abortion ends the life of a new and genetically distinct human being - one that has never existed before and will never exist again - and that you are good with ending that life, then I would have no need to argue with you. It's your fucked up moral rationalizations that I take exception with.

You're projecting your issues onto me. As an atheist I have no expectation of fairness in this world. You believe in a higher power that establishes fairness, I do not.
No. I'm not projecting anything upon you, dummy. I'm trying to get you to see reality and be honest with yourself.

It's hilarious that you believe you have no expectation of fairness when every argument you make is a moral argument. Especially since your pretzel logic ass ***** reality so you can see yourself as a good and moral person.
 
fairness is a lofty goal, but not always expected.
Then stop making moral arguments. Be an animal. Be Darwinian. Wolves don't apologize to sheep for eating their young and sheep don't see wolves as evil for eating their young.
 
I can't remember all the times I've said... un-Christian-sounding things about this or that person (mostly those in the political realm), but I remember one time a day or 2 ago: I called Maxine Waters a scary witch. Well, I was being honest w/ how i view things, but what I'm mostly repenting of now is having such a bad attitude toward her-- when really it is her POLICIES I hate, like her policy of encouraging people to harass Republicans when they are at restaurants and other places (couple years ago). I hated that. But I can't hate her because, even though it's (very) hard to remember this, God made that person. 🤔

I know... I almost feel like laughing when I say that because these elite liberals act like they've lost their "made in God's image" thing and have even become demons.

Well, God didn't make them demons, they chose to be that. It's difficult (to impossible) to see a residual of God's image there..

But as long these people are alive, there is hope that they will come to their senses.

If they hear a lot of hate from "the other side" of the aisle, well, that's not going to help... will likely just inspire them to double down on their evil ways.

We just have to remind ourselves that Jesus died for everyone - and doesn't want anyone to remain in their sins and end up in Hell.

I said a prayer for her as a penance for having such a hostile attitude toward her and the amazing thing was... I could feel that prayer actually doing something good... (I didn't expect to feel that)
God Blessed you, and opened your heart! Your lesson contemplated and learned, is spot on! Now to stay on that righteous path, will be harder than ever....tempted. Put your armour of God on...know the Word, and stay true to what you just pronounced....

The treatment for hate, is everlasting love....forgiveness. Hate the sin and not the sinner...(which we all are)

The Bible passage says something about being good or showing love to those who give angst to you, repeatedly... even when they are ass holes ....Then it will be like putting burning coals on their head....rattle their conscious....

All you need is love...as the song goes!
 
Back
Top Bottom