I recall being suspicious of this at the time.

How do you bribe someone with no power ?
Tom Homan, who was later named President Trump’s border czar, was recorded in September 2024 accepting a bag with $50,000 in cash in an undercover F.B.I. investigation, according to people familiar with the case, which was later shut down by Trump administration officials.

The cash payment, which was made inside a bag from the food chain Cava, grew out of a long-running counterintelligence investigation that had not been targeting Mr. Homan, according to the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the case.

Mr. Homan’s encounter with the undercover agents, recorded on audiotape, led him to be investigated for potential bribery and other crimes, after he apparently took the money and agreed to help the agents — who were posing as businessmen — secure future government contracts related to border security, the people said.


Agree or disagree that someone who took a bribe based on "after he apparently took the money and agreed to help the agents — who were posing as businessmen — secure future government contracts related to border security" should not have been given a job in which he would be in a position to deliver on his promise?
 
As MS NOW prepared to break the news of the bribery probe, Homan did not respond to requests for comment and the White House said the investigation began under the Biden administration and Trump appointees concluded it was politically motivated. A day later, in an interview on FOX News, Homan told anchor Laura Ingram: “I did nothing criminal. I did nothing illegal,” but stopped short of saying he did not take any cash.


MS NOW.....................lol. More liberal partisan hack rag junk.
 
I feel badly that you went to all that trouble to post a list of the horseshit R's compiled when they thought Joe would be the candidate Dotard faced on election day.

The irony being if all that bullshit was true, and trump had done all those things (in real life he did worse), The Following would not have hesitated to vote for him anyway.
 

Trump’s team skips FBI background checks for some Cabinet picks​

President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is bypassing traditional FBI background checks for at least some of his Cabinet picks while using private companies to conduct vetting of potential candidates for administration jobs, people close to the transition planning say.

Trump and his allies believe the FBI system is slow and plagued with issues that could stymie the president-elect’s plan to quickly begin the work of implementing his agenda, people briefed on the plans said. Critics say the intrusive background checks sometimes turn up embarrassing information used to inflict political damage.


Given Don's prior experience during trump 1.0 it wasn't surprising he'd be reluctant to allow his picks to be exposed to FBI scrutiny.

Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled​

Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top-secret clearance for incoming Trump officials despite unfavorable information, the two sources said.

All of which puts this in the proper perspective.

Border czar Tom Homan didn’t receive normal background check during bribery probe

In early January, several days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, a Justice Department lawyer passed an envelope across a wide desk to a top Trump transition official. Enclosed was a bombshell, typed up in a one-page summary, according to two people briefed on the meeting.

As he read the contents of the envelope, the official, Emil Bove (
the guy who would later tell DoJ subordinates to ignore court orders), closed his eyes and grimaced, according to the people, who requested anonymity to discuss a sensitive case. It revealed that Tom Homan — at that time, a frequent companion of Trump’s on the campaign trail who had publicly boasted he would be joining Trump’s administration to lead his immigrant deportation strategy — was the subject of an ongoing bribery investigation. Undercover FBI agents posing as private contractors had recorded him accepting $50,000 in cash in exchange for what they believed was Homan’s vow to help get border enforcement contracts in the new Trump administration.

A small group of career lawyers at the Justice Department felt an urgency to share this sensitive information with the president-elect’s team as soon as possible, hoping to head off potential embarrassment and a security clearance problem before Trump picked his future Cabinet and top appointees.


Heck, when you pick a nominee to be AG who was investigated for sex trafficking (wait..WHAT!), and a nominee for border czar who was investigated for taking a bribe (wait...WHAT!), the last thing you want is to have those nominees go through the normal background check process.

After all, loyalists like Pam and Kash had yet to be installed in key DoJ posts. Meaning that for the folks doing a check on Homan, the tape of him taking $50K in cash was..........let's just say it was "problematic."

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a White House briefing that “Mr. Homan never took the $50,000 that you’re referring to” despite an internal DOJ document stating that he did.

"These aren't the drones you're looking for, move along," says Karoline.
Lets be honest. Hacks like you are disingenuous. You guys dont really give a shit about corruption. As long as its your side doing it. But if its the "other side" all of a sudden you idiots like you have standards. And that goes with pretty much all issues. Its sad.
You people choose defending corrupt politicians who dont give a shit about you, over your own integrity. Absolutely mind blowing.
 
Agree or disagree that someone who took a bribe based on "after he apparently took the money and agreed to help the agents — who were posing as businessmen — secure future government contracts related to border security" should not have been given a job in which he would be in a position to deliver on his promise?
Disagree. What does apparently took the money mean ? The agents don't know if he took the money.
 
Disagree. What does apparently took the money mean ? The agents don't know if he took the money.
Yeah, they do. Which is why Ka$h and Bove were displeased with the investigation.
 
Yeah, they do. Which is why Ka$h and Bove were displeased with the investigation.
Whether Homan kept, returned, or transferred the cash is inconsistently reported and not definitively resolved in the cited pieces; some outlets and commentators ask whether the money remained in evidence or was retained, but definitive public documentation is not in these sources.

Reporting indicates prosecutors weighed whether they could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the payment met the legal elements of bribery — an intent-to-influence quid pro quo tied to an official act — and faced internal disagreement about moving forward.

 
Lets be honest. Hacks like you are disingenuous. You guys dont really give a shit about corruption. As long as its your side doing it. But if its the "other side" all of a sudden you idiots like you have standards. And that goes with pretty much all issues. Its sad.
You people choose defending corrupt politicians who dont give a shit about you, over your own integrity. Absolutely mind blowing.
Remind me of how many cabinet nominees Biden prevented from going through a FBI background check. Or Obama. Or how many members there were of either admin who faced criminal charges.

Every time one of you folks try to make the specious "they all do it" argument in defense of trump it falls flat on its face.
 
Remind me of how many cabinet nominees Biden prevented from going through a FBI background check. Or Obama. Or how many members there were of either admin who faced criminal charges.

Every time one of you folks try to make the specious "they all do it" argument in defense of trump it falls flat on its face.
So background checks, which arent even ******* required, the only corruption to you? Or were you just too scared to actually respond to what I said?
 
Whether Homan kept, returned, or transferred the cash is inconsistently reported
Homan has been inconsistent in his denials as to whether he took the cash. Which is why the investigation in to the incident should have been completed along with the public being able to read the report on it and hear the tape made by the undercover FBI agents when Homan accepted the bribe.
 
Homan has been inconsistent in his denials as to whether he took the cash. Which is why the investigation in to the incident should have been completed along with the public being able to read the report on it and hear the tape made by the undercover FBI agents when Homan accepted the bribe.
The FBI would have definitive proof.....even though it was Biden's FBI
 
15th post
will take many years for us to be a serious country again. Just getting back to that would be an accomplishment.
I think our days of international respect are behind us
The world no longer trusts us and that will not end once Trump is gone
The people who elected him are still here
 
So background checks, which arent even ******* required, the only corruption to you? Or were you just too scared to actually respond to what I said?
Ultimately, the president has the final authority on who he nominates and decides to share intelligence with, regardless of the established protocol set in the wake of World War II to make sure those selections don’t have unknown foreign ties or other issues that could raise national security concerns.

But circumventing background checks would be bucking a long-established norm in Washington. It also reflects Trump’s deep mistrust of the national security establishment, which he derides as the Deep State. Sources say he has privately questioned the need for law enforcement background checks.


Why not do the checks? Here's why.

Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top-secret clearance for incoming Trump officials despite unfavorable information, the two sources said.
 
I think our days of international respect are behind us
The world no longer trusts us and that will not end once Trump is gone
The people who elected him are still here
The question being, if we ever regain the trust of our allies how long will it take?
 
Ultimately, the president has the final authority on who he nominates and decides to share intelligence with, regardless of the established protocol set in the wake of World War II to make sure those selections don’t have unknown foreign ties or other issues that could raise national security concerns.

But circumventing background checks would be bucking a long-established norm in Washington. It also reflects Trump’s deep mistrust of the national security establishment, which he derides as the Deep State. Sources say he has privately questioned the need for law enforcement background checks.


Why not do the checks? Here's why.

Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top-secret clearance for incoming Trump officials despite unfavorable information, the two sources said.
Its not required, as I said.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom