I may have gotten the impeachment thing all wrong

[j-mac]

No it isn't, dumbass.

What do you call it?

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What do you call it?

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

 

[j-mac]

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

 

[Nostra]

Trump is not within his right to block witnesses and documents.

Your asinine opinion means nothing. That is for the courts to decide. That's how our system works, You should be mad at YOUR House Clowns for not following protocol.

Trump knows by law he needs to turn over certain documents. His delay of game tactic is obstruction.

Even a stupid **** like you knows this.

Good Lord you are a moron.

Trump has every right to challenge any subpoena the WH gets. Period.

If you think he is wrong, you take it to court. Your House Clowns didn't follow protocol. That's on them.

You are the single digit IQ moron the House Clowns are targeting with their idiotic case.

Trump has every right to challenge any subpoena the WH gets. Period.

He isn't challenging them. He's ignoring them. In fact his lawers have said they have no intention to cooperate.

That's called obstruction.

Lies.

The protocol is for the House to go to court for a ruling to see who is correct. Your House Clowns refused to follow protocol. Your butthurt should be directed at them.

How can the court decide"who is correct" when one party hasn't claimed EP but only ignored subpoenas, dope?

The fact you have to ask such a dumb questions says it all.

 

[Nostra]

No it isn't, dumbass.

What do you call it?

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

Yep. They invoke that in court. Why didn't your House Clowns follow protocol and take them to court? Your butthurt should be directed at YOUR House Clowns for failing to do their job.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

Or just charge him with obstruction.

It's up to Trump to either comply with the subpoenas, invoke EP or sue to somehow otherwise invalidate the subpoenas. He's done nothing but ignore them and state that he has no intention of complying. That is willful obstruction.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Trump knows by law he needs to turn over certain documents. His delay of game tactic is obstruction.

Even a stupid **** like you knows this.

Good Lord you are a moron.

Trump has every right to challenge any subpoena the WH gets. Period.

If you think he is wrong, you take it to court. Your House Clowns didn't follow protocol. That's on them.

You are the single digit IQ moron the House Clowns are targeting with their idiotic case.

Trump has every right to challenge any subpoena the WH gets. Period.

He isn't challenging them. He's ignoring them. In fact his lawers have said they have no intention to cooperate.

That's called obstruction.

Lies.

The protocol is for the House to go to court for a ruling to see who is correct. Your House Clowns refused to follow protocol. Your butthurt should be directed at them.

How can the court decide"who is correct" when one party hasn't claimed EP but only ignored subpoenas, dope?

The fact you have to ask such a dumb questions says it all.

Explain it to us, professor.
If you can that is.

 

[August West]

The truth is that Biden is corrupt and needs to be investigated and Trump was right to ask for help from a foreign government which likely has some of the evidence.

The Truth is that Biden doesn't get a pass from investigation for possible criminal wrongdoing when he was VP just because he is now one of several candidates for president....no matter what the Democratic/Socialist Controlled Media says.

And this is why he and his crack-head son need to testify at this farce of an impeachment--if there are any witnesses at all. Defendants get to Defend themselves. Trump's phone call to the president of Ukraine was "perfect" and if the Bidens have to answer questions under oath---they will prove it!

One more time genius. There was an international effort to remove Shokin because he refused to investigate corrupt politicians. It had nothing to do with Biden. The EU, the IMF and World bank had no interest in Biden or Burisma. Is there any story that Trump conjures up that you dumb ***** won`t believe? You and the rest of Putin`s Pussies should ask to be on Vlad`s payroll.
What really happened when Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor

 

[j-mac]

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

Or just charge him with obstruction.

It's up to Trump to either comply with the subpoenas, invoke EP or sue to somehow otherwise invalidate the subpoenas. He's done nothing but ignore them and state that he has no intention of complying. That is willful obstruction.

Heh, heh...You clearly have no clue....Here's but one example of the Obama administraion ignoring subpeona's...

"House Republicans say that the Obama administration is ignoring subpoenas for documents related to ObamaCare spending they call illegal.

Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) sent a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Tuesday calling on it to comply.

The committees issued the subpoenas on March 29, but Republicans say they have received only one heavily redacted page of one document from HHS in response."

GOP: Administration ignoring ObamaCare subpoenas

Now, should House Republican's have impeached Obama? Because that will be the standard going forward if we follow your misinformed opinion.

 

[bripat9643]

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

Why are all you TDS morons so ignorant of how the legal process works?

 

[j-mac]

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

Why are all you TDS morons so ignorant of how the legal process works?

They're not ignorant of it, they just believe that they live under different rules.

 

[bripat9643]

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

Or just charge him with obstruction.

It's up to Trump to either comply with the subpoenas, invoke EP or sue to somehow otherwise invalidate the subpoenas. He's done nothing but ignore them and state that he has no intention of complying. That is willful obstruction.

Wrong again, asshole. It's up to Congress to sue, not Trump.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What do you call it?

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

Yep. They invoke that in court. Why didn't your House Clowns follow protocol and take them to court? Your butthurt should be directed at YOUR House Clowns for failing to do their job.

No, dope. It is up to Trump to either comply or invoke EP. The subpoenas are already legal and constitutional. The issuing body doesn't require a court order stating so. However, Trump does need an order to avoid being in contempt. The burden is on Trump.

 

[Nostra]

Good Lord you are a moron.

Trump has every right to challenge any subpoena the WH gets. Period.

If you think he is wrong, you take it to court. Your House Clowns didn't follow protocol. That's on them.

You are the single digit IQ moron the House Clowns are targeting with their idiotic case.

Trump has every right to challenge any subpoena the WH gets. Period.

He isn't challenging them. He's ignoring them. In fact his lawers have said they have no intention to cooperate.

That's called obstruction.

Lies.

The protocol is for the House to go to court for a ruling to see who is correct. Your House Clowns refused to follow protocol. Your butthurt should be directed at them.

How can the court decide"who is correct" when one party hasn't claimed EP but only ignored subpoenas, dope?

The fact you have to ask such a dumb questions says it all.

Explain it to us, professor.
If you can that is.

Philbin is doing it right now, Halfwit.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

Or just charge him with obstruction.

It's up to Trump to either comply with the subpoenas, invoke EP or sue to somehow otherwise invalidate the subpoenas. He's done nothing but ignore them and state that he has no intention of complying. That is willful obstruction.

Wrong again, asshole. It's up to Congress to sue, not Trump.

No. It's up to Trump to comply or be in contempt.

 

[Nostra]

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

Yep. They invoke that in court. Why didn't your House Clowns follow protocol and take them to court? Your butthurt should be directed at YOUR House Clowns for failing to do their job.

No, dope. It is up to Trump to either comply or invoke EP. The subpoenas are already legal and constitutional. The issuing body doesn't require a court order stating so. However, Trump does need an order to avoid being in contempt. The burden is on Trump.

Philbin is destroying your bullshit as we speak.

Oops!

 

[bripat9643]

Separation of powers, dumbass.

That means nothing. Congress has the constitutional authority to subpoena materials and testimony.

And the Executive branch has the Constitutional authority to challenge them.

Oops!

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

Yep. They invoke that in court. Why didn't your House Clowns follow protocol and take them to court? Your butthurt should be directed at YOUR House Clowns for failing to do their job.

No, dope. It is up to Trump to either comply or invoke EP. The subpoenas are already legal and constitutional. The issuing body doesn't require a court order stating so. However, Trump does need an order to avoid being in contempt. The burden is on Trump.

He invokes EP in court after he's been sued, moron. There's no form called EP-901-J.

 

[Nostra]

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

Or just charge him with obstruction.

It's up to Trump to either comply with the subpoenas, invoke EP or sue to somehow otherwise invalidate the subpoenas. He's done nothing but ignore them and state that he has no intention of complying. That is willful obstruction.

Wrong again, asshole. It's up to Congress to sue, not Trump.

No. It's up to Trump to comply or be in contempt.

Philbin is destroying your lies right now.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes. They challenge it by declaring EP, idiot.

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

Or just charge him with obstruction.

It's up to Trump to either comply with the subpoenas, invoke EP or sue to somehow otherwise invalidate the subpoenas. He's done nothing but ignore them and state that he has no intention of complying. That is willful obstruction.

Heh, heh...You clearly have no clue....Here's but one example of the Obama administraion ignoring subpeona's...

"House Republicans say that the Obama administration is ignoring subpoenas for documents related to ObamaCare spending they call illegal.

Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) sent a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Tuesday calling on it to comply.

The committees issued the subpoenas on March 29, but Republicans say they have received only one heavily redacted page of one document from HHS in response."

GOP: Administration ignoring ObamaCare subpoenas

Now, should House Republican's have impeached Obama? Because that will be the standard going forward if we follow your misinformed opinion.

Where's the part where they went to court or outright refused to comply?

 

[j-mac]

So, according to you, the sitting President can NOT challange subpeona's in court less they committ obstruction of Congress? Really? Is that what you want to go with?

Becuase there are plenty of cases in not only the Obama administration doing the exact same thing, but indeed throughout the history of sitting Presidents going all the way back to Washington...So, what makes this different?

Trump isn't challenging the subpoenas in court. They are being ignored.

LOL...It's up to the Democrats to enforce their subpeona's .... Why do you libs always try to turn things on their head?

Or just charge him with obstruction.

It's up to Trump to either comply with the subpoenas, invoke EP or sue to somehow otherwise invalidate the subpoenas. He's done nothing but ignore them and state that he has no intention of complying. That is willful obstruction.

Wrong again, asshole. It's up to Congress to sue, not Trump.

No. It's up to Trump to comply or be in contempt.

So, you're just going to ignore my Hill article of how Obama did the same thing eh? Typical.