If you ( a couple ) make under $80,000 per year, you qualify for a subsidy.
And..as I have told you before.....your employer is paying 70 to 80% of the premium that the insurance company is getting for your current policy. That is in lieu of salary to you. YOU ARE PAYING WAY MORE THAN $160 PER MONTH NOW!!!!!!
Finally....let's look at your worst case scenario. You lose insurance and decide that you can't afford a policy. Then you get sick. You will get some care........because you have paid a penalty for being uninsured. That means that the rest of us are not paying for ALL of your medical expenses. You will have some skin in the game. Cool huh?!
HI LL you seem like an open honest person who is sincerely trying to be helpful.
Can you explain to me
1. who is "we": why is there an assumption that "we" the people only applies to people who agree with this federal insurance set up, having the right to dictate to all others how to pay the costs.
and nobody else has a say, even objectors who are forced to pay a fine who don't agree with that either. wouldn't it be better to separate systems because people DON'T AGREE.
there are plenty of other ways. I mentioned spiritual healing that would drastically
cut costs of crime and disease if THAT were "mandated" but not all people agree to it.
not all people agree to the federal insurance, so why can "we separate" and not dictate to each other
2. what is wrong with people who PREFER to pay for mothers and babies instead of abortions though that would be cheaper.
why this insistence that people who agree with ACA have the right to determine
for all other taxpayers how many people to cover and how much to cover?
What about everyone else, aren't we who believe in other ways equally included in "we the taxpayers"