There really is no other way to deal with intractable bureaucracy: Remember, I expressed my expectations for a MONTH before the meeting. I imagine that had I politely asked, the time-line would have been drawn even longer. Plus, I would not have gained the rep.
For some odd reason, you keep mentioning the IEP, which has absolutely nothing to do with the complaint? I would make the same complaint, in fact would make the complaint even more emphatically, if the student was my younger son, who may be a Freshman next year at this school. It is my intent not only form a reputation as the most unpleasent parent to deal with, but one with whom teachers probably don't want to fuck around with when I ask for a simple goddamn graded paper to appear each week.
They have a choice: Produce what I want, or have a formal complaint placed into their file.
Pretty simple, regardless of whether or not its called "bullying," which could be the name attached to anyone for whom you must comply.
My guess is you were riff'd to save money. Teaching credentials like the ones you've described are valuable, and a rich society is willing to pay for them. Unhappily, you, and maybe me, and a whole lot of others are going to find themselves more expensive to employ than anyone can afford.
I'm assuming you are saying that you think I'm a decent teacher, from what you know of me. I'll concur.

Seems the two districts I'm now subbing in agree, as I'm being requested faster than I can block myself out for jobs accepted. Now the question will be, will any hire me for the coming year?
For nearly a month now, sans 4 assignments, all my jobs have been in special ed, which I do NOT have an endorsement in. However, since I began teaching, I've differentiated my lessons and assessments. I've gotten my master degree in admin, with differentiation as a concentration. Don't blame me on the idiocy of such, blame the university. I KNOW it's illogical, but heh, it works for certification. Perhaps we can agree, that staff needs some differentiation?
I guess I bring up the IEP, as a defense against those like Squeeze that are attacking.
Truthfully, I think you should have seen what compromises you could have made with the teachers, though with an IEP, principal was the best route.
If it was for a student without an IEP, I would assume the board would shoot your 'demand' down, but agree that the spirit of your request should be seriously considered by each teacher.
As I said, without an IEP, I'd say, "Mr. S, I don't grade/correct subjective responses, but here is your son's/daughter's response to these remarks on 'such and such date' in 3 minutes before leaving class on this date. Here is the text of my note outlines and that is what they were responding to. Tomorrow I'll send you my notes on adjustments to my lessons. If you have any questions, please call me between 7:20-7:55 am or after 2:15." I'd also tell you what we did in class, besides my notes.
Could I recite verbatim all the discussion, questions? No. From your posts I'm assuming you'd want my hide for so little info.
Now maybe I'm reading you wrong, but if I'm right, yeah, the administration should be protecting the teachers from that. At least if they can demonstrate that the kids are learning and have been based on test results and standardized tests.
An average unit has plenty of assessments for the results you are asking for, though may not be at the frequency you demand:
Civil War-5 weeks:
9 quizzes
40 bell ringers
3 tests
15 assignments
Seems like enough grades to me in 7th grade for 5 weeks.