I feel like republicans have an odd userstanding of what a RINO IS

[OKTexas]

Great, I guess we're having an impact. With 63% of Americans saying the country is going in the wrong direction, regressivecrats and their complicit RINOS may not be long for this world.

But there is no agreement on what that direction should be

We do know it is not the direction that TeaTards are advocating

So you think the feds insinuating themselves in every aspect of our lives and putting us a trillion dollars further in debt every year is a good thing?

I agree

Our tax revenue base is ridiculously low and we spend too much

But nobody gets elected by telling people to pay more and receive less

You might have a point if the fed government wasn't taking more as a percentage of GDP than any time since 1934, except during WWII. They use to survive on well less than half what they take now.

Historical Source of Revenue as Share of GDP

 

[Billy000]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

So what you're saying is that real Republicans are not conservative, they're liberal.

We can throw that on the pile of fatuous leftwing theories. It's already got 50,000 other items in it.

I know you struggle with nuance but try and keep up will you? Republicans before the Tea Party embraced a few liberal policies but mostly embraced conservative policies.

 

[bripat9643]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

So what you're saying is that real Republicans are not conservative, they're liberal.

We can throw that on the pile of fatuous leftwing theories. It's already got 50,000 other items in it.

I know you struggle with nuance but try and keep up will you? Republicans before the Tea Party embraced a few liberal policies but mostly embraced conservative policies.

So why aren't you lamenting the disappearance of true Democrats who one even embraced tax cuts and who are now composed almost entirely of Stalinists.

 

[Billy000]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

So what you're saying is that real Republicans are not conservative, they're liberal.

We can throw that on the pile of fatuous leftwing theories. It's already got 50,000 other items in it.

I know you struggle with nuance but try and keep up will you? Republicans before the Tea Party embraced a few liberal policies but mostly embraced conservative policies.

So why aren't you lamenting the disappearance of true Democrats who one even embraced tax cuts and who are now composed almost entirely of Stalinists.

You do know that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts and is responsible for the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan right?

 

[Correll]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

There were conservative REpublicans before the Tea Party Movement.

Everything in your op is wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

So what you're saying is that real Republicans are not conservative, they're liberal.

We can throw that on the pile of fatuous leftwing theories. It's already got 50,000 other items in it.

I know you struggle with nuance but try and keep up will you? Republicans before the Tea Party embraced a few liberal policies but mostly embraced conservative policies.

So why aren't you lamenting the disappearance of true Democrats who one even embraced tax cuts and who are now composed almost entirely of Stalinists.

You do know that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts and is responsible for the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan right?

The first isn't a tax cut. It's a failure to increase taxes on all Americans, as he wanted to do. His so-called "middle class tax cut" was really a form of welfare where he handed out money to people who don't pay taxes.

 

[Billy000]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

There were conservative REpublicans before the Tea Party Movement.

Everything in your op is wrong.

We both know it isn't.

 

[Billy000]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

So what you're saying is that real Republicans are not conservative, they're liberal.

We can throw that on the pile of fatuous leftwing theories. It's already got 50,000 other items in it.

I know you struggle with nuance but try and keep up will you? Republicans before the Tea Party embraced a few liberal policies but mostly embraced conservative policies.

So why aren't you lamenting the disappearance of true Democrats who one even embraced tax cuts and who are now composed almost entirely of Stalinists.

You do know that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts and is responsible for the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan right?

The first isn't a tax cut. It's a failure to increase taxes on all Americans, as he wanted to do. His so-called "middle class tax cut" was really a form of welfare where he handed out money to people who don't pay taxes.

You're just making things up as you go along. You don't actually know what you're talking about.

 

[bripat9643]

so

So what you're saying is that real Republicans are not conservative, they're liberal.

We can throw that on the pile of fatuous leftwing theories. It's already got 50,000 other items in it.

I know you struggle with nuance but try and keep up will you? Republicans before the Tea Party embraced a few liberal policies but mostly embraced conservative policies.

So why aren't you lamenting the disappearance of true Democrats who one even embraced tax cuts and who are now composed almost entirely of Stalinists.

You do know that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts and is responsible for the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan right?

The first isn't a tax cut. It's a failure to increase taxes on all Americans, as he wanted to do. His so-called "middle class tax cut" was really a form of welfare where he handed out money to people who don't pay taxes.

You're just making things up as you go along. You don't actually know what you're talking about.

Obvious horseshit.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I feel like Democrats have an odd "userstanding" of what Freedom is.

You have a odd understanding of what is civilization. You think we should go back to hunter gathering.

 

[bripat9643]

I feel like Democrats have an odd "userstanding" of what Freedom is.

You have a odd understanding of what is civilization. You think we should go back to hunter gathering.

Government isn't civilization, nimrod.

 

[Correll]

So today's far Rightwingers seem to not understand what it means to be republican post-Tea Party. See before the tea party, republicans were generally more moderate (AKA establishment republicans). Tea Party nuttery decided they were the authority on all republican issues despite the fact that history tells them otherwise. GW Bush, Jeb Bush, John McCain are all examples of moderates. They have a few liberal positions even if they are mostly conservative. However by today's standards of the far right they are considered "RINOs" despite preceding the Tea Baggers lol. That's how dumb and crazy the rightwing has become.

Even though they won't admit it, however, St. Reagan was a moderate. He raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty, and criticized rising income inequality and big money in the political process.

I feel like the rise of the tea Baggers was a sign in a decline in our government. Stupid people started having a voice. The kind of people who can only think in binary thought. Very all or nothing, emotional reasoning devoid of critical thinking.

There were conservative REpublicans before the Tea Party Movement.

Everything in your op is wrong.

We both know it isn't.

They were conservative REpublicans before the TEa Party.

Most of the rest of the post is just different ways of saying that you have a negative opinion of conservatives.

Reagan was NOT a moderate. Try to be less crazy.

Your use of the term "bagger" at this late date shows YOU to be the extremist partisan nut.

And for you to finish up with a complaint about other's "emotional reasoning"?

Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Everyone settle down, especially you limp-wrists. Just settle back in your lazy boy and watch the thumping the democrats are going to take this year.

 

[bripat9643]

Everyone settle down, especially you limp-wrists. Just settle back in your lazy boy and watch the thumping the democrats are going to take this year.

Even if Hillary isn't indicted, she's already so tarnished that she may not even get the nomination. If she somehow manages to get past that mile stone, Trump will kill her in the general election.

 

[rightwinger]

I feel like Democrats have an odd "userstanding" of what Freedom is.

Freedoms just another word for nothing left to lose

Thanks for admitting your hatred of freedom to the entire forum. However, we already knew that.

Hey, it's good enough for me and Bobby McGee

 

[Billy000]

so

I know you struggle with nuance but try and keep up will you? Republicans before the Tea Party embraced a few liberal policies but mostly embraced conservative policies.

So why aren't you lamenting the disappearance of true Democrats who one even embraced tax cuts and who are now composed almost entirely of Stalinists.

You do know that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts and is responsible for the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan right?

The first isn't a tax cut. It's a failure to increase taxes on all Americans, as he wanted to do. His so-called "middle class tax cut" was really a form of welfare where he handed out money to people who don't pay taxes.

You're just making things up as you go along. You don't actually know what you're talking about.

Obvious horseshit.

Nah it's not.