I Don't Understand Why Democrats Keep Calling For Free Speech

There was no religious disagreement in the case of the Roman Empire vs. Jesus H. Christ. The case was about a charge of insurrection.

BTW, liberal activist Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk because of relgious disagreement, and libs had no problem with that.

In fact they refused to honor Kirk and show up to his funeral, instead playing golf during his funeral.

Well, no, Robinson killed Kirk because he was bashing gay people like him.

Where did we say that we had "no problem" with his assassination? Everyone I know has condemned it. You guys are the ones celebrating his death with fireworks.

But back to the point about Jesus. He never existed. But if you read the Fairy Tales of the Gospels, it was pretty clear Pilate didn't want to execute Jesus, but the Jewish Mob wanted him dead. (I can see why you are confused on this point, as the Churches all pretend the bible doesn't say this because they feel sad about the Holocaust and stuff.)

Now, the fairy tale makes more sense in the context of trying to make the Romans look good and the Jews look bad. The reality about Pilate is that he went out of his way to antagonize the Jews at every turn, which is why Tiberius eventually sacked him.
 
Anybody on the right waking up to the truth yet?


 
And if he were prosecuted today, he'd have been found not guilty by reason of mental defect. Guiteau was crazy.

I bet you miss lynchings, too!
So, the crazy ones are safe. And you love that.
 
See guys? This is exactly why I want limits on free speech when it comes to things like this. As this much hatred can turn into violent actions really quickly and the article even states that it's connected to violence.

Second wave of threatening Charlie Kirk flyers found at Georgetown | Fox News Georgetown acts quickly after disturbing flyers reemerge on campus mocking Charlie Kirk: 'Rest in p-ss'
Free speech should be strictly within the confines of the constitution, whereby it should be a guideline to what free speech can be, and how it should be used in order to uplift the republic, and to call those out who are undermining the republic. I think that free speech is being abused and used in order to foment dangerous activities and messages that undermine our constitution and our laws that were created under the constitution. We need a re-empowerment of the constitution and it's intent regarding us as a free people within the confines of our constitution and values built upon said constitution.
 
Of course you have to know that the libs mean by "exonerated".

It means that their paid-by-the-taxpayer lawyers found out their was a slight chance that the defendant was not paying attention when his rights were being read to him when he was picked up, even though he was dead to rights guilty.

So a man like that should be proclaimed "innocent".

In the old school days, they officials moved straight to execution. When Jesus H. Christ was convicted in court of insurrection, they didn't engage in years of appeals , but moved directly to execution.

That's what the expensive part is, not the juice needed to get the electric chair in frying mode, but all of the pointless appeals.

You made all of that up.
 
Well, no, Robinson killed Kirk because he was bashing gay people like him.
You don't murder due to words. Aside from that, Kirk never bashed people. He debated. And when he did, he had a super great foundation. He was so good, lies got spread about him. When the person in the debate wore Kirk out, he did not bash them, he wanted to hear from the next person not agreeing with him. His killer is sane and will be shot to death for murdering this great human being.
 
Jesus never existed, and I don't think you want to go back to the days when we executed people for religious disagreements.
Jesus did exist.
Kirks killer did not agree with what he thought were Charlies views. And he was not a true follower so he did not know Charlies views.
 
There are 200 people who have been exonerated from Death Row because they were proven to be innocent, and perhaps 22 people who were executed who possibly didn't do what they were accussed of.
When Trump was convicted, we saw plenty of evidence that juries are not always right. Of course I never have wanted the innocent to be executed. But as you realize, that is a defense used by many convicts though proven guilty. Just this September a convict said as he was being executed he is innocent. But witnesses said he lied and was guilty of murder.
 
Where did we say that we had "no problem" with his assassination? Everyone I know has condemned it. You guys are the ones celebrating his death with fireworks.

Libs voted against honoring Charlie Kirk in Congress, that shows definitely no problem with his getting clipped.

Further, where where they in Arizona during the Kirk memorial? None of them even showed up. None even called the widow to apologize for their fellow lib either
 
Here's the problem with the Death Penalty, that probably doesn't get past your "Blood Atonement" mentality, doesn't seem to grasp. (yes, always rip the Mormon Crazy when I can)
Sure, ruin your argument by lashing out at Mormons. Factually you lash out a huge amount of time. How can you know Mormons given all of your hate?
FACT
However, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has formally rejected this doctrine and does not endorse blood atonement as a valid practice today.
 
It’s his property. It’s his stuff and Halloween is a holiday that’s all about death. What’s the problem?

What are the zip ties for?
 
It’s his property. It’s his stuff and Halloween is a holiday that’s all about death. What’s the problem?

The problem is that I bet Tyler Robinson decorates his yard for Halloween like that.
 
15th post
They claim that it's free speech for them to celebrate the assassination of Charlie Kirk and unfortunately it is, but where was his free speech to disagree with their views? Why must they murder people who don't agree with them? Oh wait, I get it,... It's the only way they think that they're going to win by silencing the threat. The only thing is that Tyler Robinson didn't silence Charlie Kirk at all. His plan backfired because now his voice is louder than ever. Nobody ever did manage to prove him wrong. That's why he was assassinated.

The White House deleted its own DOJ study that showed right-wing terrorism is the greatest terrorism danger Americans face. So, from the commies at the CATO Institute:

Keeping all other Islamist attacks and excluding 9/11 reduces the number of murders to 618 from 3,597 and cuts the Islamist share of murder from 87 percent to 23 percent. It similarly raises the right-wing share of murders in terrorist attacks from 11 percent to 63 percent, the left-wing share from about 2 percent to 10 percent, and the unknown/other share to 1 percent.

Okay, MAGAts, you may now resume your never-ending, self-pity party. Not like you're going to let reality interrupt it, anyway.
 
The problem is that a DP prosecution is far more expensive than a life sentence.
Yes you are correct. Any appeal on any legal matter is far more expensive than stopping prosecutions or carrying out sentences of all natures.
But that also applies to most things done by employees of Governments. Have you ever paid for a Environmental report?
 
Back
Top Bottom