I Don't Understand Why Democrats Keep Calling For Free Speech

[JoeB131]

A lot of you keep asking me this question. Even some of you being Republicans. Well this is why. Tell me honestly, do you think that any of these people should be allowed to walk free in society?


Second wave of threatening Charlie Kirk flyers found at Georgetown | Fox News Georgetown acts quickly after disturbing flyers reemerge on campus mocking Charlie Kirk: 'Rest in p-ss'

That is incredibly poor taste.

But last time I checked, and we have a right to have incredibly poor taste.

I think a lot of what Kirk said was in incredibly poor taste, but he had every right to say it.

See how that works?

 

[Robert W]

Hopefully he doesn’t have any rifles.

Meanwhile, my adcice to him is:

Cry harder.

My advice to Tyler Robinson is enjoy prison for the time it takes to execute you.

 

[Robert W]

That is incredibly poor taste.

But last time I checked, and we have a right to have incredibly poor taste.

I think a lot of what Kirk said was in incredibly poor taste, but he had every right to say it.

See how that works?

How many times did you actually watch his presentations? Every time I saw him over many years, he was kind and very well informed.

 

[ChristisKing]

Like Tyler Robinson

Beat me to it.

 

[BackAgain]

My advice to Tyler Robinson is enjoy prison for the time it takes to execute you.

Maybe he should start pondering what he’d like to dine upon for his last meal, now, so he can get his order in before it’s too late.

Assuming he is guilty, of course.

 

[Foxfyre]

This is a good laboratory to examine the Democrats minds. Where they trip all over themselves daily.

I think that analysis has already been done. When they offer absolutely zero vision, game plan, agenda or rationale for one but ALL they have is to attack and accuse Trump/MAGA/Patriots/Republicans while using the assigned talking point, trash talk of the day, you know they've got little or nothing going for them but strength in numbers and control of most of the message. And it seems those numbers are now dwindling and there are cracks in their propaganda machines controlling the message.

 

[forkintheroad7]

Shae McInnis (of Georgetown [college?] Republicans) called for swift accountability.

(following emphasis mine) He said:

"The university should identify every student involved, and they must be immediately expelled… If the university is not willing to do that, I would urge the federal government to please help," he said. "Please protect conservative students at Georgetown and across every campus in our country."

 

[JoeB131]

My advice to Tyler Robinson is enjoy prison for the time it takes to execute you.

Lots of blood lust there.

Why does he deserve the DP more than the 25,000 other murders that happen in this country?

 

[Robert W]

Lots of blood lust there.

Why does he deserve the DP more than the 25,000 other murders that happen in this country?

]
My advice one more time is to enjoy prison. No blood lust at all. So do you want 25,000 more executions?

 

[forkintheroad7]

Maybe he should start pondering what he’d like to dine upon for his last meal, now, so he can get his order in before it’s too late.

Assuming he is guilty, of course.

Well, technically, we don't know if he did it (yet). I've heard some stories about how the gun allegedly used was not the actual weapon used and things like that. I hear Candace Owens says the left (or Israel) killed him, but I have not sought out the details on why she said that (yet)

 

[BackAgain]

Well, technically, we don't know if he did it (yet). I've heard some stories about how the gun allegedly used was not the actual weapon used and things like that. I hear Candace Owens says the left (or Israel) killed him, but I have not sought out the details on why she said that (yet)

I’ve read the rumors. I find them to be utterly unpersuasive.

But, I did say, “assuming” his guilt.

I’ll just go with “alleged assassin” for now.

 

[JoeB131]

]
My advice one more time is to enjoy prison. No blood lust at all. So do you want 25,000 more executions?

No, I want them to serve their time.

The Death Penalty is barbaric.

 

[Robert W]

No, I want them to serve their time.

The Death Penalty is barbaric.

why don't you care about time their victims lost? Killers are far more barbaric.

 

[Robert W]

I’ve read the rumors. I find them to be utterly unpersuasive.

But, I did say, “assuming” his guilt.

I’ll just go with “alleged assassin” for now.

Frankly, President Garfield's killer was executed about 11 months after he murdered Garfield and that seems very reasonable to me.
**********************
Charles Guiteau, who assassinated President James A. Garfield, was executed by hanging nearly one year after the murder, which took place on July 2, 1881. He died on June 30, 1882, making his life after the assassination approximately 11 months.

 

[TimFitz]

Absolutely not.

 

[JoeB131]

why don't you care about time their victims lost? Killers are far more barbaric.

Is killing someone going to bring them back?

Um, no.

The problem is that a DP prosecution is far more expensive than a life sentence. So the money spent popping off a killer like a party favor for Wingnuts usually means a state has to let other criminals go for lack of funds to keep them locked up.

There's a reason why DP States have higher murder rates than non-DP states.

Here's the problem with the Death Penalty, that probably doesn't get past your "Blood Atonement" mentality, doesn't seem to grasp. (yes, always rip the Mormon Crazy when I can)

If you wrong, you can't fix it.

There are 200 people who have been exonerated from Death Row because they were proven to be innocent, and perhaps 22 people who were executed who possibly didn't do what they were accussed of.

 

[JoeB131]

Frankly, President Garfield's killer was executed about 11 months after he murdered Garfield and that seems very reasonable to me.
**********************
Charles Guiteau, who assassinated President James A. Garfield, was executed by hanging nearly one year after the murder, which took place on July 2, 1881. He died on June 30, 1882, making his life after the assassination approximately 11 months.

And if he were prosecuted today, he'd have been found not guilty by reason of mental defect. Guiteau was crazy.

I bet you miss lynchings, too!

 

[Polishprince]

There are 200 people who have been exonerated from Death Row because they were proven to be innocent, and perhaps 22 people who were executed who possibly didn't do what they were accussed of.

Of course you have to know that the libs mean by "exonerated".

It means that their paid-by-the-taxpayer lawyers found out their was a slight chance that the defendant was not paying attention when his rights were being read to him when he was picked up, even though he was dead to rights guilty.

So a man like that should be proclaimed "innocent".

In the old school days, they officials moved straight to execution. When Jesus H. Christ was convicted in court of insurrection, they didn't engage in years of appeals , but moved directly to execution.

That's what the expensive part is, not the juice needed to get the electric chair in frying mode, but all of the pointless appeals.

 

[JoeB131]

Of course you have to know that the libs mean by "exonerated".

It means that their paid-by-the-taxpayer lawyers found out their was a slight chance that the defendant was not paying attention when his rights were being read to him when he was picked up, even though he was dead to rights guilty.

So a man like that should be proclaimed "innocent".

No, I mean a case like Rolando Cruz, where the County of DuPage went forward with a prosecution even though they knew another guy had confessed to the murder. When that conviction was thrown out, they prosecuted him again on the dubious theory that he was partners with the guy who did it, even though he never met that guy. When that conviction was thrown out, the third one was finally stopped when one of the cops admitted the evidence they gathered against him was false.

They put the cops and prosecutors on trial for trying to essentially murder this man, but they were acquitted and then the mostly white jury went out and had drinks with them.

In the old school days, they officials moved straight to execution. When Jesus H. Christ was convicted in court of insurrection, they didn't engage in years of appeals , but moved directly to execution.

Jesus never existed, and I don't think you want to go back to the days when we executed people for religious disagreements.

That's what the expensive part is, not the juice needed to get the electric chair in frying mode, but all of the pointless appeals.

 

[Polishprince]

Jesus never existed, and I don't think you want to go back to the days when we executed people for religious disagreements.

There was no religious disagreement in the case of the Roman Empire vs. Jesus H. Christ. The case was about a charge of insurrection.

BTW, liberal activist Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk because of relgious disagreement, and libs had no problem with that.

In fact they refused to honor Kirk and show up to his funeral, instead playing golf during his funeral.