CDZ I can't stand this anti-trade bullshit

[Indeependent]

Face it, without Slave Labor you couldn't generate a decent income for your clients.

Face it, if you hadn't dropped out of school, you wouldn't believe in bullshit, discredited leftist ideology and myths you think are facts.

So please explain why you can't generate a decent income for your clients without Slave Labor.
I know LOTS of people who became wealthy BEFORE Reagan.
Maybe you're just too lazy to find really good companies outside of China.

 

[Indeependent]

No more Wall Street Gambling Casino Bail Outs.

Fine by me, commie.

Get the government out of the economy.

Too bad you leftists don't believe in the same thing.

Fine...No Military to protect shipments, no security at airports for air shipments, no patent protection for companies that don't pay for it.
Explain to me again why you don't know this stuff already?

 

[Indeependent]

Excuse me...NO nation starts off with NO Borders and NO Laws.
Laws were PASSED by the few wealthy to allow Americans to starve.
I never voted for Goldman-Sachs to enact non-Ricardian Free Trade.

lol

Any other ignorant, sloganeering irrelevant straw men you want to bring up?

You are supporting leftist, statist communism.

Stop being a hypocrite and embrace your inner leftist.

Bullshit...no nation has no borders and no laws.
I know lots of assholes like you face to face.
Unabashed bullshit artists.
You make a living from guessing how a Stock's going to perform.

"You make a living from guessing how a Stock's going to perform."

And make a pretty good living regardless if the stock performs or not

Yes, and that's why Trump just won.
No more Wall Street Gambling Casino Bail Outs.

I think you picked the wrong guy to fulfill that promise...

Please elaborate...

 

[Toro]

So please explain why you can't generate a decent income for your clients without Slave Labor.
I know LOTS of people who became wealthy BEFORE Reagan.
Maybe you're just too lazy to find really good companies outside of China.

That you have to ask the question means you don't understand the answer, commie.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

----------------------------------------------------------- we Americans want our manufacturing jobs back Onyx .

Most of "our" manufacturing jobs are mechanized, producing more goods with less labor.

 

[Indeependent]

Face it, without Slave Labor you couldn't generate a decent income for your clients.

Face it, if you hadn't dropped out of school, you wouldn't believe in bullshit, discredited leftist ideology and myths you think are facts.

A have a Master's Degree, worked for Wall Street Investment Firms for 20 years and that's why I can debate you into a corner.
There's no lie you can tell that I haven't experienced.

hahahahahahahaha

If you're going to lie, at least make it plausible.

Ad hominem.
Now when are you going to explain why 98% of the US worried about their next gallon of milk is a good thing.
YOU are the Statist.

 

[Indeependent]

So please explain why you can't generate a decent income for your clients without Slave Labor.
I know LOTS of people who became wealthy BEFORE Reagan.
Maybe you're just too lazy to find really good companies outside of China.

That you have to ask the question means you don't understand the answer, commie.

Of course I understand how to make an easy buck.
But I'm not a self-centered, egoistic, sociopathic prick.

 

[Toro]

Now when are you going to explain why 98% of the US worried about their next gallon of milk is a good thing.
YOU are the Statist.

Because they don't, leftist.

You are making shit up to justify your Marxist, anti-capitalist bullshit.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Fuck you for wanting the US to be a nation of food servers.

You do realize that there are scads of service jobs that pay very comfortable livings, don't you?

 

[Indeependent]

----------------------------------------------------------- we Americans want our manufacturing jobs back Onyx .

Most of "our" manufacturing jobs are mechanized, producing more goods with less labor.

Please explain why FoxConn has over 500,000 thousand workers imprisoned to perform Automated Work.
If you can't, stop posting nonsense.

 

[Indeependent]

Now when are you going to explain why 98% of the US worried about their next gallon of milk is a good thing.
YOU are the Statist.

Because they don't, leftist.

You are making shit up to justify your Marxist, anti-capitalist bullshit.

I asked you to explain something that is as clear as day and you deny reality because you live in a ritzy neighborhood.

 

[Toro]

So please explain why you can't generate a decent income for your clients without Slave Labor.
I know LOTS of people who became wealthy BEFORE Reagan.
Maybe you're just too lazy to find really good companies outside of China.

That you have to ask the question means you don't understand the answer, commie.

Of course I understand how to make an easy buck.
But I'm not a self-centered, egoistic, sociopathic prick.

Instead, you are an ignorant, hypocritical leftist who thinks America can't compete in the world, and the government should restrict individual liberty and freedom by imposing taxes and implementing laws that imposes government intervention in the economy.

 

[Indeependent]

Fuck you for wanting the US to be a nation of food servers.

You do realize that there are scads of service jobs that pay very comfortable livings, don't you?

Really?
Name some.
And specify what you consider to be a comfortable living and in what cities.

 

[Toro]

Now when are you going to explain why 98% of the US worried about their next gallon of milk is a good thing.
YOU are the Statist.

Because they don't, leftist.

You are making shit up to justify your Marxist, anti-capitalist bullshit.

I asked you to explain something that is as clear as day and you deny reality because you live in a ritzy neighborhood.

Hey, if you want to defend socialism like Bernie Sanders or Saul Alinsky, be my guest. At least you'd be intellectually honest.

 

[Indeependent]

So please explain why you can't generate a decent income for your clients without Slave Labor.
I know LOTS of people who became wealthy BEFORE Reagan.
Maybe you're just too lazy to find really good companies outside of China.

That you have to ask the question means you don't understand the answer, commie.

Of course I understand how to make an easy buck.
But I'm not a self-centered, egoistic, sociopathic prick.

Instead, you are an ignorant, hypocritical leftist who thinks America can't compete in the world, and the government should restrict individual liberty and freedom by imposing taxes and implementing laws that imposes government intervention in the economy.

If you read The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, Fortune and many other Financial Publications, you would be fully aware that just about every CEO interviewed by these Publications state explicitly that America can't compete in the world.
You DO read these Publications?

 

[Indeependent]

Now when are you going to explain why 98% of the US worried about their next gallon of milk is a good thing.
YOU are the Statist.

Because they don't, leftist.

You are making shit up to justify your Marxist, anti-capitalist bullshit.

I asked you to explain something that is as clear as day and you deny reality because you live in a ritzy neighborhood.

Hey, if you want to defend socialism like Bernie Sanders or Saul Alinsky, be my guest. At least you'd be intellectually honest.

You consistently demonstrate that you don't know the definition of Comparative Advantage.

 

[Treeshepherd]

Most things are not absolute truths. Policies can be beneficial under certain conditions and negative under others.

Examples from 100 years ago (ie Great Depression) are not necessarily apt for today's world. Following the World Wars, America was building the world's cars and washing machines, so there wasn't any motive for protectionism. And it wouldn't even have been economically feasible to buy our steel from the other side of the globe.

Fast forward to today, the conditions have completely changed. Shipping has evolved. And steel is cheaper to buy from China because they subsidise the industry and pay their workers crap.

Keynes had a midlife change of heart about protectionism and he wrote a paper called 'economic patriotism'. He basically lost faith that true free trade was possible because other countries never abide by the same rules. They cheat. It doesn't pay to be the only player at the table who isn't cheating.

There's a time and place for increased globalism, and the same can be said for increased protectionism/decoupling.

 

[Treeshepherd]

Furthermore, almost every media outlet is owned by a parent company which benefits from globalism. Keep that in mind while they're 'educating' you.

 

[alpine]

Most things are not absolute truths. Poicicies can be beneficial under certain conditions and negative under others.

Examples from 100 years ago (ie Great Depression) are not necessarily apt for today's world. Following the World Wars, America was building the world's cars and washing machines, so there wasn't any motive for protectionism. And it wouldn't even have been economically feasible to buy our steel from the other side of the globe.

Fast forward to today, the conditions have completely changed. Steel is cheaper to buy from China because they subsidise the industry and pay their workers crao.

Keynes had a midlife change of heart about protectionism and he wrote a paper called 'economic patriotism'. He's basically lost faith that true free trade was possible because other countries never abide by the same rules. They cheat. It doesn't pay to be the only player at the table who isn't cheating.

There's a time and place for increased globalism, and the same can be said for increased protectionism/decoupling.

But I think you are missing the fact that America maybe not be manufacturing the majority of tech goods, but sure has the edge when it comes to branding.

Chinese have been trying to establish global brands and get the same recognition as US brands have, but failed miserably.

 

[Indeependent]

Most things are not absolute truths. Policies can be beneficial under certain conditions and negative under others.

Examples from 100 years ago (ie Great Depression) are not necessarily apt for today's world. Following the World Wars, America was building the world's cars and washing machines, so there wasn't any motive for protectionism. And it wouldn't even have been economically feasible to buy our steel from the other side of the globe.

Fast forward to today, the conditions have completely changed. Shipping has evolved. And steel is cheaper to buy from China because they subsidise the industry and pay their workers crap.

Keynes had a midlife change of heart about protectionism and he wrote a paper called 'economic patriotism'. He basically lost faith that true free trade was possible because other countries never abide by the same rules. They cheat. It doesn't pay to be the only player at the table who isn't cheating.

There's a time and place for increased globalism, and the same can be said for increased protectionism/decoupling.

Absolutely..."Evergreen" Policies are doomed to failure sooner or later.
There can definitely be a see-saw between Fair Trade and Free Trade if not for the intrusion of the Greedy Human.