ihopehefails
VIP Member
- Oct 3, 2009
- 3,384
- 228
- 83
- Banned
- #1
Really? You just turned a private behavior between two teenagers into a misdomeaner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We also were the last to pass MLK as a holiday. gotta love Arizona.
If they want to outlaw it, why cant they?
If they want to outlaw it, why cant they?
Its inviting the government into a 'private sphere' behavior that only society should handle on its own and turning it into the government's business.
Here is a hypothetical situation. A father gets a notice in the mail that his son is charged with a misdomeaner because he got hot sex texts from five hot girls. The father, who is kind of sexist, doesn't mind so much because he is realizing his son is a stud so normally he wouldn't care but the government comes along and does. You are kind of removing the personal choice from the parent to the state about how a child is to be raised.
Don't get me wrong, I think this behavior is really bad but should be handled by the community between the people.
If they want to outlaw it, why cant they?
Its inviting the government into a 'private sphere' behavior that only society should handle on its own and turning it into the government's business.
Here is a hypothetical situation. A father gets a notice in the mail that his son is charged with a misdomeaner because he got hot sex texts from five hot girls. The father, who is kind of sexist, doesn't mind so much because he is realizing his son is a stud so normally he wouldn't care but the government comes along and does. You are kind of removing the personal choice from the parent to the state about how a child is to be raised.
Don't get me wrong, I think this behavior is really bad but should be handled by the community between the people.
let me give you a hypothetical. a 13 year old girl decides to send a 14 year old boy a nude pic of herself via text. the boy decides to send it to sall his friends because, well because he's a 14 year old boy. the boy's dad is a bit of a sexist so he thinks it's no big thing until the cops show up at the door and arrest his son for trafficking in child porn which is a felony. the boy is convicted and now the the 13 year old has to register as a level 3 sex offender for the rest of his life. seems to me this law is an attempt to make the punishment appropriate to the crime.
here's one case, there's literally hundreds
Prosecutors review CO middle school 'sexting' case - Nation AP - MiamiHerald.com
When someone is branded a sex offender for life because some 13 year old bimbo decided to text him a nude photo and, being 14, he shared it then you know that something is messed up. With that mark upon him he will likely never go to college and struggle to ever get a job, and he's only 14 years old.
If they want to outlaw it, why cant they?
If they want to outlaw it, why cant they?
I KNEW they were a bunch of closet big government lovers who thinks the police belong in our bedrooms!
Tell the girl that's what she gets for sending her picture around. That way she learns a lesson she'll have to remember in this digital world.
If an adult sends a pic of someone who is obviously a minor back and forth punish the adult.
Really? You just turned a private behavior between two teenagers into a misdomeaner.
Child porn is illegal and that's what sexting is. Jut like statutory rape laws, some are designed to protect kids - not just to punish them. This is a step in the right direction. Too many naïve children being victimized by adults who condone it. See Zona's post.
I come at it from a different point of view. The whole flaw of a Republic is majority rule. The extreme examples are if the majority want slavery should it be legal? What if the majority hates jews or anal sex?The whole point of the Republic is that a majority will rule.
If they want to outlaw it, why cant they?
Its inviting the government into a 'private sphere' behavior that only society should handle on its own and turning it into the government's business.
Here is a hypothetical situation. A father gets a notice in the mail that his son is charged with a misdomeaner because he got hot sex texts from five hot girls. The father, who is kind of sexist, doesn't mind so much because he is realizing his son is a stud so normally he wouldn't care but the government comes along and does. You are kind of removing the personal choice from the parent to the state about how a child is to be raised.
Don't get me wrong, I think this behavior is really bad but should be handled by the community between the people.
If they want to outlaw it, why cant they?
Its inviting the government into a 'private sphere' behavior that only society should handle on its own and turning it into the government's business.
Here is a hypothetical situation. A father gets a notice in the mail that his son is charged with a misdomeaner because he got hot sex texts from five hot girls. The father, who is kind of sexist, doesn't mind so much because he is realizing his son is a stud so normally he wouldn't care but the government comes along and does. You are kind of removing the personal choice from the parent to the state about how a child is to be raised.
Don't get me wrong, I think this behavior is really bad but should be handled by the community between the people.
While it can be a very private thing, it nearly always becomes a very public thing. It is dangerous and needs to be stop. It is not a violation of free speech.
When someone is branded a sex offender for life because some 13 year old bimbo decided to text him a nude photo and, being 14, he shared it then you know that something is messed up. With that mark upon him he will likely never go to college and struggle to ever get a job, and he's only 14 years old.