I am telling everyone now, if you think Trump supporters are just going to support GOP in the future, I think you're very mistaken

[Pogo]

“The GOP must stop pandering to good, productive, real, traditional core Americans...they must switch gears and pander to wetbacks, pole puffers, rug munchers, chicks with dicks, feminazis, low life welfare degenerates, criminals, drug users, BurnLootMurder and all the other factions of filth that Mexicrats sell their asses to.”

There have been Republicans (RINOs) who have allowed the liberal Democrats to tear down the statues of our military heroes. They are okay with the Democrats destroying our proud heritage. Because of this we might not be giving our blind support to the GOP in the future.

Oh really.

Show the class where "Democrats" have "torn down the statues of our military heroes". We'll wait.

And by "military heroes" I presume you mean "losers and suckers". What was in it for them?

 

[kaz]

That would be wonderful. With the GOP no longer having to pander to the deplorables they might go back to something that can be reasoned with.

By Republicans being willing to be reasoned with you mean they will be beatable into submission again

 

[shockedcanadian]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

This thread title now appearing in the dictionary under "Strawman argument".

Rump is not about politics. Rump has NEVER been about politics. Are you just now figuring that out??

Rump's loose association with "the Republican Party" is as exclusively relevant as his association with, say, NBC. It's the convenient vehicle of the moment. Whatever vehicle serves Numero Uno, he's on it. And we've only been pointing this out for FIVE YEARS.

DUH.

A Party is fluid, it's not a bloody cult. So, they got behind a fighter. NONE of the other candidates in 2016 would have beaten Hillary.

See what I mean?
Your stated goal here, even though still pretending to be Canadian, is to "beat Hillary".
It's not to promote any kind of policies, it's not to improve the country --- it's to "beat Hillary". It's entirely personal.

And that's a personality cult.

As I already said ----- DUH.

I am not part of ANY cult. My interest in politics was periphrial until 2016.

My first choices for GOP in 2016 were Rand Paul or Rubio. In fact, I thought Trump was there to help the Dems as he was so controversial and outside the political norm.

I also supported, in spirit, Hillary over Obama. Not because I knew much when watching it on TV, but because, at the time, I thought her husband did a good job.

It wasn't until Trump starting talking about CHina and your southern border issues that I listened and took him serious. I also happened to have read enough and learn enough to know that China needed to be confronted. It is never too late I suppose, but the West is definitely far behind.

If any Dem had come out with a strong opinion against Chinas abuses of our international trading system, spying and human right abuses, I would have supported them too. I can't vote, but I would speak my mind and know my preference They have been ODDLY silent on these vital global concerns. The question is, why? It concerns me and it should concern anyone who defends freedom.

 

[lennypartiv]

I heard one commentator say that Trump was the leading GOP nominee for 2024.

If American allows Biden to steal this election, word is Trump will start a TV news network to compete against OAN and Fox. The GOP nominee in 2024 will be Ivanka Trump who will become our first woman president.

 

[Pogo]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

This thread title now appearing in the dictionary under "Strawman argument".

Rump is not about politics. Rump has NEVER been about politics. Are you just now figuring that out??

Rump's loose association with "the Republican Party" is as exclusively relevant as his association with, say, NBC. It's the convenient vehicle of the moment. Whatever vehicle serves Numero Uno, he's on it. And we've only been pointing this out for FIVE YEARS.

DUH.

A Party is fluid, it's not a bloody cult. So, they got behind a fighter. NONE of the other candidates in 2016 would have beaten Hillary.

See what I mean?
Your stated goal here, even though still pretending to be Canadian, is to "beat Hillary".
It's not to promote any kind of policies, it's not to improve the country --- it's to "beat Hillary". It's entirely personal.

And that's a personality cult.

As I already said ----- DUH.

I am not part of ANY cult. My interest in politics was periphrial until 2016.

My first choices for GOP in 2016 were Rand Paul or Rubio. In fact, I thought Trump was there to help the Dems as he was so controversial and outside the political norm.

I also supported, in spirit, Hillary over Obama. Not because I knew much when watching it on TV, but because, at the time, I thought her husband did a good job.

It wasn't until Trump starting talking about CHina and your southern border issues that I listened and took him serious. I also happened to have read enough and learn enough to know that China needed to be confronted. It is never too late I suppose, but the West is definitely far behind.

If any Dem had come out with a strong opinion against Chinas abuses of our international trading system, spying and human right abuses, I would have supported them too. I can't vote, but I would speak my mind and know my preference They have been ODDLY silent on these vital global concerns. The question is, why? It concerns me and it should concern anyone who defends freedom.

I love the way you comb over your posts to insert "your" and "I can't vote" so you can continue to pretend to be Canadian eh?

The rest of this garbage is clamoring to get out of the hole you already dug. "To beat Hillary". Personality cult.
Bustée.

Then again maybe you really are Canadian since you seem to have no idea at all that Rumpism is not, and never has been, about any kind of politics whatsoever. Or maybe you're just Gullible, salivating on cue at the mention of "Jina" or "rapists" or whatever makes you salivate, without ever seeing through the obvious manipulation.

 

[Flash]

The GOP didn't **** anybody. The thieving Democrats that stole the election with voter fraud screwed not only Republicans but all Americans.

They are the assholes.

 

[occupied]

No they are not. They are defenders of their own fat asses that think someone else getting the same as they have means they lose something.

If you take from those who earned it and give it to welfare bums that are too lazy to work good people will resist

you can count on it

Yada yada. Every farmer in America is now a welfare bum.

 

[shockedcanadian]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

This thread title now appearing in the dictionary under "Strawman argument".

Rump is not about politics. Rump has NEVER been about politics. Are you just now figuring that out??

Rump's loose association with "the Republican Party" is as exclusively relevant as his association with, say, NBC. It's the convenient vehicle of the moment. Whatever vehicle serves Numero Uno, he's on it. And we've only been pointing this out for FIVE YEARS.

DUH.

A Party is fluid, it's not a bloody cult. So, they got behind a fighter. NONE of the other candidates in 2016 would have beaten Hillary.

See what I mean?
Your stated goal here, even though still pretending to be Canadian, is to "beat Hillary".
It's not to promote any kind of policies, it's not to improve the country --- it's to "beat Hillary". It's entirely personal.

And that's a personality cult.

As I already said ----- DUH.

I am not part of ANY cult. My interest in politics was periphrial until 2016.

My first choices for GOP in 2016 were Rand Paul or Rubio. In fact, I thought Trump was there to help the Dems as he was so controversial and outside the political norm.

I also supported, in spirit, Hillary over Obama. Not because I knew much when watching it on TV, but because, at the time, I thought her husband did a good job.

It wasn't until Trump starting talking about CHina and your southern border issues that I listened and took him serious. I also happened to have read enough and learn enough to know that China needed to be confronted. It is never too late I suppose, but the West is definitely far behind.

If any Dem had come out with a strong opinion against Chinas abuses of our international trading system, spying and human right abuses, I would have supported them too. I can't vote, but I would speak my mind and know my preference They have been ODDLY silent on these vital global concerns. The question is, why? It concerns me and it should concern anyone who defends freedom.

I love the way you comb over your posts to insert "your" and "I can't vote" so you can continue to pretend to be Canadian eh?

The rest of this garbage is clamoring to get out of the hole you already dug. "To beat Hillary". Personality cult.
Bustée.

Then again maybe you really are Canadian since you seem to have no idea at all that Rumpism is not, and never has been, about any kind of politics whatsoever. Or maybe you're just Gullible, salivating on cue at the mention of "Jina" or "rapists" or whatever makes you salivate, without ever seeing through the obvious manipulation.

Where do you think I am from? Who the hell admits to being Canadian? LOL!

I have been screwed by my own failing country. I'm warning many of you, who DON'T understand what's in store for you.

 

[Anathema]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

I’ve been saying this for more than a decade. Conservatives are no longer going to support Establishment Republicans. That’s why McCain and Romney had no chance to win.

If Republicans continue to nominate and run centrist, Moderate, Establishment candidates; they will continue to lose.

We’ve shown a non-Establishment candidate can win even if he’s a puts. Now imagine if we ran a well spoken, mature Conservative candidate who walks the talk. The andslide might rival Reagan’s.

 

[shockedcanadian]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

I’ve been saying this for more than a decade. Conservatives are no longer going to support Establishment Republicans. That’s why McCain and Romney had no chance to win.

If Republicans continue to nominate and run centrist, Moderate, Establishment candidates; they will continue to lose.

We’ve shown a non-Establishment candidate can win even if he’s a puts. Now imagine if we ran a well spoken, mature Conservative candidate who walks the talk. The andslide might rival Reagan’s.

I felt the best chance for the GOP in 2016 was Rand Paul, followed by Marco Rubio.

There was no way in my eyes that Bush would win. He'd raise a tonne of cash from his PAC's but he would have lost.

Americans want leadership and those who support the Constitution, not those looking to exploit the nation for self benefit.

 

[lennypartiv]

“The GOP must stop pandering to good, productive, real, traditional core Americans...they must switch gears and pander to wetbacks, pole puffers, rug munchers, chicks with dicks, feminazis, low life welfare degenerates, criminals, drug users, BurnLootMurder and all the other factions of filth that Mexicrats sell their asses to.”

There have been Republicans (RINOs) who have allowed the liberal Democrats to tear down the statues of our military heroes. They are okay with the Democrats destroying our proud heritage. Because of this we might not be giving our blind support to the GOP in the future.

Oh really.

Show the class where "Democrats" have "torn down the statues of our military heroes". We'll wait.

And by "military heroes" I presume you mean "losers and suckers". What was in it for them?

It's common knowledge liberal Democrats want to tear down all the military statues in the southern states. We expect our Republican leaders to stand up against this revisionist history from the liberal Democrats.

 

[Invisibleflash]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

First time I voted in 45 years. Prob last time. Crooked as hell.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

Oh yeah with Trump not on the ballot,the senate could have globalists republicans like bush,McCain and Romney in it.none of those will be in it of course except maybe Romney,just using them as examples of gop globalists that want a new world order that would be put in.scary stuff.

 

[Anathema]

I felt the best chance for the GOP in 2016 was Rand Paul, followed by Marco Rubio.

There was no way in my eyes that Bush would win. He'd raise a tonne of cash from his PAC's but he would have lost.

Americans want leadership and those who support the Constitution, not those looking to exploit the nation for self benefit.

I have no use for any of those three individuals. I wouldn’t have voted for any of them as they’re Establishment individuals and not Conservatives so far as I’m concerned.

Americans want Leadership and Constitutional Government. We haven’t had either in a century. They also want Traditional morals and values. Not Socialism. Not Political Correctness. Nothing less.

 

[Pogo]

“The GOP must stop pandering to good, productive, real, traditional core Americans...they must switch gears and pander to wetbacks, pole puffers, rug munchers, chicks with dicks, feminazis, low life welfare degenerates, criminals, drug users, BurnLootMurder and all the other factions of filth that Mexicrats sell their asses to.”

There have been Republicans (RINOs) who have allowed the liberal Democrats to tear down the statues of our military heroes. They are okay with the Democrats destroying our proud heritage. Because of this we might not be giving our blind support to the GOP in the future.

Oh really.

Show the class where "Democrats" have "torn down the statues of our military heroes". We'll wait.

And by "military heroes" I presume you mean "losers and suckers". What was in it for them?

It's common knowledge liberal Democrats want to tear down all the military statues in the southern states. We expect our Republican leaders to stand up against this revisionist history from the liberal Democrats.

You: makes specious claim about "statues of our military heroes"
Me: show any evidence
You: "uh... everybody knows. Yeah that's it"

You lose.

 

[Pogo]

Americans want leadership and those who support the Constitution, not those looking to exploit the nation for self benefit.

Yep. 75 million voters just said exactly that.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Americans want leadership and those who support the Constitution, not those looking to exploit the nation for self benefit.

Yep. 75 million voters just said exactly that.

What about the 70 who voted the other way?

 

[jasonnfree]

It's clear that this is the end result of this. These voters aren't going to line up to vote for Rubio, Cruz or others. They may even lose the Senate now, since Trump isn't on the ballot.

Career politicians are useless because they aren't independent like Trump.

They’ll do just fine with the orange cancer gone. In fact, they may get back to something approaching normal. And I’m sorry, even if Trump is gone, most of his supporters would never pull a lever for a Democrat anyway. They’ll support the Republican.
The bloodbath never materialized and Republicans actually did quite well on Tuesday night. They do have more Senate seats up in 2022, but they are positioned well.

Trump supporters might pull a lever for democrats in the future if Biden would offer something besides 'I don't stink as bad as Trump'. We'll see. He could say he'll push for medicare for all, which seems to be a no no for the corporate democrats.

 

[Pogo]

Americans want leadership and those who support the Constitution, not those looking to exploit the nation for self benefit.

Yep. 75 million voters just said exactly that.

What about the 70 who voted the other way?

Whelp -- that's a problem. Apparently we have 70 million cultists who waddle among us, probably even look just like us, who will bleat on cue for any demagogue con artist who commands them to. They're gonna have to figure themselves out.

Of course, the Duopoly has to take some blame for those numbers as well. When you get exactly two choices and the choices are "bad" and "worse", you're gonna get millions of people voting against rather than voting for, like blocking in a giant game of Tic Tac Toe. Been that way for all of our lifetimes. That's a separate issue. Now if we lived in a more intelligently-based parliamentary system like, oh I dunno, Canada, we might have more than "two".

 

[The Original Tree]

Joe Biden is Illegitimate now, same as Hitler was in 1933.
No GOP-Conservative will acknowledge him as president and will spit in his face if he knocks on our doors.