Thanks for proving my post.
The Brits gave equal amounts of land to 2 parties, and you chose to call squatters the
people of Israel who's ancestry is of the
land, but the strategized immigration of Arabs from many nations who's ancesty is from other regions you don't call squatters.
=opposite reality.
Proof:
Arab league archives admit:
During the rising tide of European Jewish immigration, land purchases (as opposed to the propaganda claiming theft of land) and settlement in Palestine generated increasing resistance by Palestinian Arab peasants, journalists and political figures. example letter of their concern:
**1 ( Abdullah bin al-Hussein Amman on: 11 Thul Hijja 1364 Corresponding to: 16 November 1945Presidency of the Arab League - Cairo"The Arab nation is wailing the urgent magnanimity of the Arab States and there is no time to waste, otherwise the Jews will be able to *buy new lands*and push new immigrants to Palestine.")*
Secondly he mentions how they wanted to bring in Arab immigrants into Palestine on a monthly basis and in numbers equal to the Jewish immigrants.
Palestinian Arabs opposed the British Mandate because it thwarted their aspirations for self-rule, and opposed massive Jewish immigration because it threatened their position in the country and control of the region.
The Jewish National Fund *purchased* large tracts of land
*from absentee Arab landowners*, the Arabs living in these areas were evicted
*by Brits* in formation of the Jewish portion of Palestine, but also because of the Wars the Arabs were starting and had started. These displacements led to increasing tensions and propaganda that the reply poster bought hook line & sinker.