Hunter will be indicted by the end of the month according to the DOJ

Let's see....a man who was hooked on drugs years ago lied on a carry form about drugs eliminates his father from reelection but a man with four indictments for trying to steal an election on federal and state levels, showing classified documents around, and fraud over paying a porn star off after sex is eligible? What planet are you from?

The coyote caught the road runner....now what?
Trump isn't charged with paying off a porn star. Where are you from?
 

What does this mean?

Will it be some whitewash which comes “plea ready” with no particular consequences?

Or might not actually be a genuine prosecution?

Moreover, if special counsel Weiss does bring felony gun charges against Hunter, is it likely that those very charges are already legally suspect?
It's a dog and pony show for public consumption.
 
It's a dog and pony show for public consumption.
That might be a fair guess.

I am wondering if it’s a head fake.

If the legal validity of the federal gun charge against Hunter is now open to debate, here’s some pure speculation. I wonder if the only charges will be the tax case crap. Drag that shit out a bit (if any felony charge is included) and then, whenever they feel the time is right, let him cop to the tax misdemeanors.
 

If he broke the law, he needs to answer for it. I hope the repubs are happy. In any case, I am not defending Hunter. I have always said he needs to answer for what he did while he was doing drugs. The law is the law. Now, if repubs can figure out that the same standard applies to trump, maybe they could see they are supporting a criminal as their nominee?

“Now, if repubs can figure out that the same standard applies to trump”


I think Trump has already faced indictment.

He will face more as the Dems / Marxists line up their Soros backed lackeys.

What will the next charges aimed at Trump amount to. Felony Jay-Walking?
 
He's facing 91 counts. He's already been found liable for rape. He paid a 25-million-dollar settlement for defrauding people. His charitable organization was closed because he violated laws. Yes, trump has committed crimes.
And he may be a convicted felon before November 2024. But MAGA repubs don't care.
 
That might be a fair guess.

I am wondering if it’s a head fake.

If the legal validity of the federal gun charge against Hunter is now open to debate, here’s some pure speculation. I wonder if the only charges will be the tax case crap. Drag that shit out a bit (if any felony charge is included) and then, whenever they feel the time is right, let him cop to the tax misdemeanors.
Likely something very close to what you described. The earlier sweetheart deal was such a laughable fraud that the judge couldn’t let the court be disgraced.

The re-deux will be a fraud as well, just not as blatant.
 
He's facing 91 counts.
Yes.
He's already been found liable for rape.
False.
He paid a 25-million-dollar settlement for defrauding people.
The suit was for defrauding people, you mean?
His charitable organization was closed because he violated laws.
That was the alleged basis.
Yes, trump has committed crimes.
No valid evidence supports that idiotic assertion.
 
No Meister, they aren't. And I'm not good with corruption. That's why I said what I did about what Republicans are doing. Because you right wingers need to learn that making claims without evidence is not proof. Joe Bidens net worth is less than 10 million. He's been getting paid at least 100,000 per year since 1970.
Might want to check your numbers and math, IM2. No, Joe wasn't getting paid a 100,000 a year since the 70's.....legally.
Another thing, might want to check those shell companies and the families income over the last 10 years.
 
Might want to check your numbers and math, IM2. No, Joe wasn't getting paid a 100,000 a year since the 70's.....legally.
Another thing, might want to check those shell companies and the families income over the last 10 years.
No I don't have to check anything.

 
No I don't have to check anything.

No you don't, but you were wrong, that's a fact. You really aren't as smart as you claim yourself to be, IM2 :eusa_whistle:


IM2 stated:
"Joe Bidens net worth is less than 10 million. He's been getting paid at least 100,000 per year since 1970"
Joe Bidens net worth is less than 10 million-WRONG (nobody can estimate his net worth with his shell companies)
He's been getting paid at least 100,000 per year since 1970-WRONG
 
Last edited:

If he broke the law, he needs to answer for it. I hope the repubs are happy. In any case, I am not defending Hunter. I have always said he needs to answer for what he did while he was doing drugs. The law is the law. Now, if repubs can figure out that the same standard applies to trump, maybe they could see they are supporting a criminal as their nominee?
Joe is fixin' to throw his son under the bus.
 
No you don't, but you were wrong, that's a fact. You really aren't as smart as you claim yourself to be, IM2 :eusa_whistle:


IM2 stated:
"Joe Bidens net worth is less than 10 million. He's been getting paid at least 100,000 per year since 1970"
Joe Bidens net worth is less than 10 million-WRONG (nobody can estimate his net worth with his shell companies)
He's been getting paid at least 100,000 per year since 1970-WRONG
I am correct and you believe a bunch of unproven, fact free right wing garbage.

How Republicans overhype the findings of their Hunter Biden probe​


“The Committee has identified over 20 companies affiliated with certain Biden family members and their business associates.”
— Majority staff of the House Oversight Committee, Second Bank Records memorandum, released May 10

“We’ve identified about 20-plus shell companies that the Bidens have created to launder the money they were receiving from foreign nationals down to their personal bank account.”
— Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, interview on Fox Business, May 11

“The Committee has now identified over $20 million in payments from foreign sources to the Biden family and their business associates.”
— Majority staff of the House Oversight Committee, Third Bank Records memorandum, released Aug. 9

“The Biden family received over $20 million from our enemies around the world. What did they do to receive the money?”
— Comer, interview on Newsmax, Aug. 10

The memos are written in a partisan manner — ignoring or playing down contrary information — but an interesting pattern has emerged. The memos themselves have careful language that is often hedged. Then Comer and other GOP lawmakers, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), go on Twitter or speak to conservative media using hyperbolic language that goes well beyond what the memos say. Over time, the reporting on the memos in conservative media becomes untethered from the documentation in the reports.

For instance, the second staff memo never says that Hunter Biden used “shell” companies a term often associated with shady or illegal activity, even though a shell company is a legitimate entity. Comer once described such an entity as “a fake company … they don’t make anything. They don’t produce anything. They don’t provide a good or service.” He is not wrong about many shell companies, but the memo lists real companies, with active websites and real business functions. (The third staff memo refers to just one “shell” company, which we will describe later.)
As for the $20 million in payments, Comer and other Republicans invoke this figure often. A close reading of the memos, however, finds that only about $7 million can be directly attributed to Biden family members, mostly Hunter, while the rest went to “associates,” according to the memos.

 

Forum List

Back
Top