Hunter Biden's Lawyers Demand DOJ To Investigate Trump Allies Over Laptop

[jbrownson0831]

WASHINGTON (AP) — A lawyer for President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, has asked the Justice Department to investigate close allies of former President Donald Trump and others who he says accessed and disseminated personal data from a laptop that was dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop in 2019.

In a separate letter, Biden’s attorneys have also asked Fox News host Tucker Carlson to retract and apologize for what they say are false and defamatory claims made repeatedly about him on-air, including implying without evidence that he had unauthorized access to classified documents found at his father’s home.

More at the link below...

Hunter Biden Seeks Federal Probe Of Trump Allies Over Laptop

A lawyer for President Biden’s son asked the Justice Department to investigate close Trump allies, saying they accessed and disseminated personal data from his laptop.

www.huffpost.com

Good to see Hunter fighting back. What do you think?

Yes, commie America haters having each others backs. Dimmer ilk never ceases to amaze.

 

[forkup]

At that point it was the repair shop owner’s property, not Crackheads.

He could do whatever the hell he wanted with it.

Delaware Code Title 11. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1335 | FindLaw

Delaware Title 11. Crimes and Criminal Procedure Section 1335. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

(9) Knowingly reproduces, distributes, exhibits, publishes, transmits, or otherwise disseminates a visual depiction of a person who is nude, or who is engaging in sexual conduct, when the person knows or should have known that the reproduction, distribution, exhibition, publication, transmission, or other dissemination was without the consent of the person depicted and that the visual depiction was created or provided to the person under circumstances in which the person depicted has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Applicable law disagrees.

 

[struth]

Delaware Code Title 11. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1335 | FindLaw

Delaware Title 11. Crimes and Criminal Procedure Section 1335. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

(9) Knowingly reproduces, distributes, exhibits, publishes, transmits, or otherwise disseminates a visual depiction of a person who is nude, or who is engaging in sexual conduct, when the person knows or should have known that the reproduction, distribution, exhibition, publication, transmission, or other dissemination was without the consent of the person depicted and that the visual depiction was created or provided to the person under circumstances in which the person depicted has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Applicable law disagrees.

hahah when hunter dropped those pics off to a third party..he had not expectation to privacy

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I will thoroughly enjoy watching the leftists try to defend this giant POS for the next two years.

 

[forkup]

hahah when hunter dropped those pics off to a third party..he had not expectation to privacy

Is that a fact? So if I drop my laptop of to a computer repair shop I can't reasonably expect him to keep my dick a private matter? I see... Well it's a novel take on privacy I would say.

 

[struth]

Is that a fact? So if I drop my laptop of to a computer repair shop I can't reasonably expect him to keep my dick a private matter? I see... Well it's a novel take on privacy I would say.

no you can’t. take the dick pic off first

on what planet do you think it’s reasonable to expect privacy when you are handing stuff out to other people?

 

[SeaMajor7]

It is amazing seeing the demented LEFT twist into pretzels denying any wrong doings of the Biden crime family and the lap top from hell.
Amazingly PATHETIC that is!

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Is that a fact? So if I drop my laptop of to a computer repair shop I can't reasonably expect him to keep my dick a private matter? I see... Well it's a novel take on privacy I would say.

I would read the disclaimer they make you sign if I were you.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

It is amazing seeing the demented LEFT twist into pretzels denying any wrong doings of the Biden crime family and the lap top from hell.
Amazingly PATHETIC that is!

Like I said, 2 years of constant entertainment.

 

[forkup]

no you can’t. take the dick pic off first

on what planet do you think it’s reasonable to expect privacy when you are handing stuff out to other people?

In a world were when I pay for a service I expect the person to provide that service without him causing me harm.

 

[forkup]

I would read the disclaimer they make you sign if I were you.

Lol you think there is a disclaimer that allows one person to use private information from another person including nude photographs when repairing a laptop? To quote struth "in what world do you think you live"

 

[struth]

In a world were when I pay for a service I expect the person to provide that service without him causing me harm.

you can sue him…but when you turn over evidence of a potential crime to someone…don’t be surprised they show law enforcement

the fact you would even think differently is mind blowing

 

[struth]

Lol you think there is a disclaimer that allows one person to use private information from another person including nude photographs when repairing a laptop? To quote struth "in what world do you think you live"

there is no need for a disclaimer. you have no expectation to privacy once yoj turn over those photos to a third party

 

[pyetro]

Good luck with that one. The contract says after 60 days it is unclaimed property…. meaning the company (store) can do anything it wants. Much of the data protection and data loss prevention statutes of third parties are limited to personal data captured and stored within a third party’s systems.

I say bring the lawsuit on. It should be fun. Trump had more on Biden and the Democrats spying on him as a Presidential candidate and private citizen in 2016 and that went nowhere.

Here's what you left out of the "After 60 days you lose it" comment.
But by his own account, Mac Isaac said he went through files on Hunter Biden’s laptop the day after it was dropped off. In his book, Mac Isaac said the day after Hunter Biden dropped off the laptop, he noticed a file titled “income.pdf” in the hard drive, which apparently tracked Biden’s finances.

Hunter Biden calls for criminal probe in aggressive new legal strategy | CNN Politics

Attorneys for Hunter Biden on Wednesday asked state and federal agencies to investigate a computer repair shop owner, Rudy Giuliani and number of right-wing political figures involved in disseminating contents of his laptop, alleging that they committed computer and other criminal violations in...

www.cnn.com

 

[forkup]

you can sue him…but when you turn over evidence of a potential crime to someone…don’t be surprised they show law enforcement

the fact you would even think differently is mind blowing

Ah "the strawman". When you can't argue the point. Misrepresent the position of the person you are talking to, and argue against that.

I haven't said anything about turning over evidence of a crime as being wrong. Hell I'm not interested in defending Hunter Biden. Although nothing I've seen leaked from that laptop qualifies as evidence to a crime. At least not without a hell of a lot of corroboration from other sources.

My argument is simply that information was leaked from that laptop, specifically nude photographs of which the distributing without explicit consent is a crime. This applies to Hunter Biden, to you, to me, to everybody. You on the other hand are claiming this is not the case.

 

[forkup]

there is no need for a disclaimer. you have no expectation to privacy once yoj turn over those photos to a third party

Of course you do. If I upload my pictures to a cloud that information remains private unless specifically stated otherwise.

I'll put it like this. You usually can't predict when a laptop will break. In your version of the world you can't get this laptop repaired if it has nude pictures on it because the person that repairs it in your version can distribute those pictures freely.

 

[struth]

Ah "the strawman". When you can't argue the point. Misrepresent the position of the person you are talking to, and argue against that.

I haven't said anything about turning over evidence of a crime as being wrong. Hell I'm not interested in defending Hunter Biden. Although nothing I've seen leaked from that laptop qualifies as evidence to a crime. At least not without a hell of a lot of corroboration from other sources.

My argument is simply that information was leaked from that laptop, specifically nude photographs of which the distributing without explicit consent is a crime. This applies to Hunter Biden, to you, to me, to everybody. You on the other hand are claiming this is not the case.

i’ve repeatedly said it’s not a crime because there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you turn those nude photos over to a third party.

had this guy hacked his computer that’s a different story…but he literally handed him the photos.

what happened in this case was the repairman was doing his job, and saw what he believed was/is evidence of potential crimes and handed it over to law enforcement…that’s perfectly legal and something we want to happen

hunter, you and the demafascist propaganda nonsense is mere deflection from the facts

 

[forkup]

i’ve repeatedly said it’s not a crime because there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you turn those nude photos over to a third party.

had this guy hacked his computer that’s a different story…but he literally handed him the photos.

what happened in this case was the repairman was doing his job, and saw what he believed was/is evidence of potential crimes and handed it over to law enforcement…that’s perfectly legal and something we want to happen

hunter, you and the demafascist propaganda nonsense is mere deflection from the facts

And you've been repeatedly wrong. Third parties do not automatically get permission to publish nude pictures. If that would be the case victims of revenge porn would have no legal recourse. This is manifestly not the case.

He didn't just turn it over to law enforcement. He turned them over to Gulliani who IS NOT law enforcement.

I'm perfectly willing to accept that the information wasn't property of Biden anymore because of some disclaimer.

But the MOMENT nude pictures of him appear the person distributing them is breaking the law. It is the whole point of that specific law. That nude pictures can not be published for any reason without consent.

 

[jasonnfree]

Go Hunter!

At this time, Hunter's all they have in their arsenal. Wonder why they don't go after Kushner and billions from the Saudis.

 

[struth]

And you've been repeatedly wrong. Third parties do not automatically get permission to publish nude pictures. If that would be the case victims of revenge porn would have no legal recourse. This is manifestly not the case.

He didn't just turn it over to law enforcement. He turned them over to Gulliani who IS NOT law enforcement.

I'm perfectly willing to accept that the information wasn't property of Biden anymore because of some disclaimer.

But the MOMENT nude pictures of him appear the person distributing them is breaking the law. It is the whole point of that specific law. That nude pictures can not be published for any reason without consent.

haha this wasn’t revenage porn. i am completely right. hunter wasn’t giving these photos to a girlfriend, who later published them…he gave them to a stranger at a shop.