The only report you are talking about came from the police. Is that what you meant?
That is going to take a long time to read. I feel like I am in kindergarten.
You act like it to..
This is just the beginning of a major story a la Brown and Garner, and you are stuck on rewind.
and look how those turned out.
The cops are running out of ploys.
The only report you are talking about came from the police. Is that what you meant?
That is going to take a long time to read. I feel like I am in kindergarten.
You act like it to..
This is just the beginning of a major story a la Brown and Garner, and you are stuck on rewind.
The cops are running out of ploys.
Sorry but as was mentioned cops have a lot of leeway when it comes to these kind of things.
The only report you are talking about came from the police. Is that what you meant?
That is going to take a long time to read. I feel like I am in kindergarten.
You act like it to..
This is just the beginning of a major story a la Brown and Garner, and you are stuck on rewind.
The cops are running out of ploys.
The only report you are talking about came from the police. Is that what you meant?
That is going to take a long time to read. I feel like I am in kindergarten.
You act like it to..
This is just the beginning of a major story a la Brown and Garner, and you are stuck on rewind.
The cops are running out of ploys.
Ploy?
Graham vs Connor. Supreme Court.
Its law. Dont **** with cops. Its that simple.
This is just the beginning of a major story a la Brown and Garner, and you are stuck on rewind.
The cops are running out of ploys.
Ploy?
Graham vs Connor. Supreme Court.
Its law. Dont **** with cops. Its that simple.
I didn't say anything about legislative courtroom ploys.
This is just the beginning of a major story a la Brown and Garner, and you are stuck on rewind.
The cops are running out of ploys.
Ploy?
Graham vs Connor. Supreme Court.
Its law. Dont **** with cops. Its that simple.
I didn't say anything about legislative courtroom ploys.
No ploy.
Just hard cold law.
The cops are running out of ploys.
Ploy?
Graham vs Connor. Supreme Court.
Its law. Dont **** with cops. Its that simple.
I didn't say anything about legislative courtroom ploys.
No ploy.
Just hard cold law.
Law again? Other than legislative means ploys to cover themselves in serious or deadly misconduct.
Law again? Other than legislative means ploys to cover themselves in serious or deadly misconduct.
Such as?
It doesn't say they missed. It says the tasers had no effect. Meth, PCP or bath salts do the same thing.The police chief said that the cops deployed a Stun Gun on the man without any effect. Montes was nailing them with rocks, but incredibly the police missed with their Tasers.
Law again? Other than legislative means ploys to cover themselves in serious or deadly misconduct.
Such as?
Try your imagination like everybody else.
It doesn't say they missed. It says the tasers had no effect. Meth, PCP or bath salts do the same thing.The police chief said that the cops deployed a Stun Gun on the man without any effect. Montes was nailing them with rocks, but incredibly the police missed with their Tasers.
Law again? Other than legislative means ploys to cover themselves in serious or deadly misconduct.
Such as?
Try your imagination like everybody else.
So in other words...you have no evidence. Just speculation.
Sorry bud. The cold raw law is just that. Like it or not its the law.
Law again? Other than legislative means ploys to cover themselves in serious or deadly misconduct.
Such as?
Try your imagination like everybody else.
So in other words...you have no evidence. Just speculation.
Sorry bud. The cold raw law is just that. Like it or not its the law.
You are still confused with legislation and the law in general.
Law again? Other than legislative means ploys to cover themselves in serious or deadly misconduct.
Such as?
Try your imagination like everybody else.
So in other words...you have no evidence. Just speculation.
Sorry bud. The cold raw law is just that. Like it or not its the law.
You are still confused with legislation and the law in general.
Um...legislation is the law dipshit. Legislators make laws. Courts rule on laws.
The SCOTUS ruled on alleged assaults by police officers, Graham v. Connor, Terry v. Ohio, Tennessee v. Garner.
Legislation becomes law. Courts interpret law.
Im charging you tuition next time.
Um...legislation is the law dipshit. Legislators make laws. Courts rule on laws.
The SCOTUS ruled on alleged assaults by police officers, Graham v. Connor, Terry v. Ohio, Tennessee v. Garner.
Legislation becomes law. Courts interpret law.
Im charging you tuition next time.
You seriously misunderstood what I said and continue to, even though I have tried nicely to bring that to your attention.
Do you believe it was justified to kill Montes?
Um...legislation is the law dipshit. Legislators make laws. Courts rule on laws.
The SCOTUS ruled on alleged assaults by police officers, Graham v. Connor, Terry v. Ohio, Tennessee v. Garner.
Legislation becomes law. Courts interpret law.
Im charging you tuition next time.
You seriously misunderstood what I said and continue to, even though I have tried nicely to bring that to your attention.
Do you believe it was justified to kill Montes?
Yes. He was throwing big rocks at a cop. Which can fracture skulls OR knock someone out. They knew this guy...because they have prior incidents...of him throwing big rocks AND trying to take cops guns.
So this guy has a history of this shit. Hes gone for their guns in past incidents (see the WHOLE story on PoliceOne.com) They tried a taser...and it didnt work.
During the chase he suddenly turned and quickly raised hands...after having thrown rocks at them. So...they fired to stop a threat.
Taking all the details of the situation in...yes they were justified under Graham vs Connor.
Um...legislation is the law dipshit. Legislators make laws. Courts rule on laws.
The SCOTUS ruled on alleged assaults by police officers, Graham v. Connor, Terry v. Ohio, Tennessee v. Garner.
Legislation becomes law. Courts interpret law.
Im charging you tuition next time.
You seriously misunderstood what I said and continue to, even though I have tried nicely to bring that to your attention.
Do you believe it was justified to kill Montes?
Yes. He was throwing big rocks at a cop. Which can fracture skulls OR knock someone out. They knew this guy...because they have prior incidents...of him throwing big rocks AND trying to take cops guns.
So this guy has a history of this shit. Hes gone for their guns in past incidents (see the WHOLE story on PoliceOne.com) They tried a taser...and it didnt work.
During the chase he suddenly turned and quickly raised hands...after having thrown rocks at them. So...they fired to stop a threat.
Taking all the details of the situation in...yes they were justified under Graham vs Connor.
This is such a stupid statement I'm surprised the keys on the keyboard consented to be touched.
When the man turned and raised his hands there was no threat.
Rocks can not be thrown from raised hands, they must be thrown from a cocked arm.
The officers will have to provide proof that rocks were thrown at them during the chase or at the conclusion of the chase, they can not.
The officers must be able to provide a reasonable, justifiable reason for the use of deadly force.
If they use your silly assed rationale, they may as well ask the Judge for mercy at their sentencing.
You are still confused with legislation and the law in general.
Um...legislation is the law dipshit. Legislators make laws. Courts rule on laws.
The SCOTUS ruled on alleged assaults by police officers, Graham v. Connor, Terry v. Ohio, Tennessee v. Garner.
Legislation becomes law. Courts interpret law.
Im charging you tuition next time.
You seriously misunderstood what I said and continue to, even though I have tried nicely to bring that to your attention.
Do you believe it was justified to kill Montes?
Yes. He was throwing big rocks at a cop. Which can fracture skulls OR knock someone out. They knew this guy...because they have prior incidents...of him throwing big rocks AND trying to take cops guns.
So this guy has a history of this shit. Hes gone for their guns in past incidents (see the WHOLE story on PoliceOne.com) They tried a taser...and it didnt work.
During the chase he suddenly turned and quickly raised hands...after having thrown rocks at them. So...they fired to stop a threat.
Taking all the details of the situation in...yes they were justified under Graham vs Connor.
This is such a stupid statement I'm surprised the keys on the keyboard consented to be touched.
When the man turned and raised his hands there was no threat.
Rocks can not be thrown from raised hands, they must be thrown from a cocked arm.
The officers will have to provide proof that rocks were thrown at them during the chase or at the conclusion of the chase, they can not.
The officers must be able to provide a reasonable, justifiable reason for the use of deadly force.
If they use your silly assed rationale, they may as well ask the Judge for mercy at their sentencing.
You cant throw a rock from a raised arm? Hmmm. You ever watch football or baseball?
You're just wrong. By law they cant be judged on hindsight. ONLY on what they percieved at the split second. And if hes been throwing rocks...and suddenly turns and raises an arm...in a split 1/10 second you'll think hes about to throw another rock. So did they. And they shot.
These cops are not guilty.
And if they charge them to appease cop hating liberals...these cops will.win millions in a lawsuit.
