For example, you equate God with a magical fairy
No, I conflate them, in the sense of proposing magic. I don't equate fairies and unicorns, but I can still conflate them in the sense of introducing magic. That is not a red herring. Improper use of that term on your part. The point is the introduction of magic. A point you seem to squeamish to addres, much less mention...
Correct, I am arguing that they are quacks. It was literally the point. That also would not be a red herring. I'm starting to think you don't actually know what that term means.
And you failed to address any point I made, nor could you state any of the logic. which, basically, renders your entire post -- pay attention to the correct usage of the term to follow -- one big red herring.
go back and read the entire post again, as if I am talking directly to you. because I, essentially, am. You don't mind our knowledge of isotopic half-lives, right up until they contradict your strident YEC dogma. That, sir, is a fact, and you know it. And it makes you absurd.