Sorry bout that,
It’s what you voted for. Congrats
Before everyone start voting after knowing the verdict, let me post how dumb this message board is:Trump is warning of a "catastrophe" if the USSC rules against him on his managing tariffs, ruled illegal after 10/14/25.
Appeals court rules many of Trump's tariffs are illegal
A federal appeals court said many of the tariffs imposed by President Trump on dozens of countries earlier this year are not legally permissible, but didn't halt them.www.cbsnews.com
Congress gave presidents power over tariffs. They could aways take it back
Joining Grassley are former Republican leader Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and GOP Sens. Jerry Moran of Kansas, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Todd Young of Indiana and Susan Collins of Maine.
A similar bill is being introduced by Rep. Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, in the House of Representatives.
“It’s time that Congress restores its authorities here,” Bacon said on CBS News over the weekend. “We gave some of that power to the executive branch, and I think in hindsight, that was a mistake.”
Not everyone agrees that Trump’s current interpretation of the law — in which he can impose tariffs by declaring a national emergency — is legitimate.
In short: Although the District Court was adamant that imposing tariffs requires an exercise of taxation power, rather than the power to regulate commerce, the Constitution’s original meaning and Supreme Court precedent indicate that tariffs can be used in both the taxation and commerce-regulation settings. Thus, by clearly delegating power to regulate foreign commerce—a power that has long been understood to include the authority to impose tariffs—IEEPA is best understood as delegating tariff-setting authority to the President. What’s more, neither the nondelegation doctrine nor the major questions doctrine invalidate IEEPA’s delegation of tariff authority.
The President’s Authority to Impose Tariffs – Chad Squitieri
Download a PDF The President’s Authority to Impose Tariffs Chad Squitieri* Introduction The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”)[1] empowers the President to “regulate . .&nbs…journals.law.harvard.edu
Interestingly, Section 122 has never previously been used, and as a consequence, the courts have not had reason to interpret its language. Some commentators have suggested that it might legitimately be used to target trade deficits, but others conclude that the term balance-of-payments does not refer to trade deficits, Section 122 (a) referring to the balance-of-payments, and Section 122 (c) which refers the balance of trade, i.e., there is a presumption that Congress intended to make the distinction.
Does the President Have Legal Authority to Set Across-the-Board Tariffs?
by: Ian Sheldon, Professor and Andersons Chair of Agricultural Marketing, Trade, and Policy, Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, Ohio State University Current Legal Status The U…u.osu.edu
So most experts say its not a slam dunk either way. We should know by 10/14 which is when the tariffs become illegal.
Hope dumb is this Message board? Let me post the results before people start voting after knowing the verdict.:Trump is warning of a "catastrophe" if the USSC rules against him on his managing tariffs, ruled illegal after 10/14/25.
Appeals court rules many of Trump's tariffs are illegal
A federal appeals court said many of the tariffs imposed by President Trump on dozens of countries earlier this year are not legally permissible, but didn't halt them.
Congress gave presidents power over tariffs. They could aways take it back
Joining Grassley are former Republican leader Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and GOP Sens. Jerry Moran of Kansas, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Todd Young of Indiana and Susan Collins of Maine.
A similar bill is being introduced by Rep. Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, in the House of Representatives.
“It’s time that Congress restores its authorities here,” Bacon said on CBS News over the weekend. “We gave some of that power to the executive branch, and I think in hindsight, that was a mistake.”
Not everyone agrees that Trump’s current interpretation of the law — in which he can impose tariffs by declaring a national emergency — is legitimate.
In short: Although the District Court was adamant that imposing tariffs requires an exercise of taxation power, rather than the power to regulate commerce, the Constitution’s original meaning and Supreme Court precedent indicate that tariffs can be used in both the taxation and commerce-regulation settings. Thus, by clearly delegating power to regulate foreign commerce—a power that has long been understood to include the authority to impose tariffs—IEEPA is best understood as delegating tariff-setting authority to the President. What’s more, neither the nondelegation doctrine nor the major questions doctrine invalidate IEEPA’s delegation of tariff authority.The President’s Authority to Impose Tariffs – Chad Squitieri
Download a PDF The President’s Authority to Impose Tariffs Chad Squitieri* Introduction The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”)[1] empowers the President to “regulate . .&nbs…
Interestingly, Section 122 has never previously been used, and as a consequence, the courts have not had reason to interpret its language. Some commentators have suggested that it might legitimately be used to target trade deficits, but others conclude that the term balance-of-payments does not refer to trade deficits, Section 122 (a) referring to the balance-of-payments, and Section 122 (c) which refers the balance of trade, i.e., there is a presumption that Congress intended to make the distinction.Does the President Have Legal Authority to Set Across-the-Board Tariffs?
by: Ian Sheldon, Professor and Andersons Chair of Agricultural Marketing, Trade, and Policy, Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, Ohio State University Current Legal Status The U…
So most experts say its not a slam dunk either way. We should know by 10/14 which is when the tariffs become illegal.
I see what you're saying. You're admitting that you are no conservative. Hate to burst your bubble, but everyone already knew that. I also see that your debating skills are in using pictures.
Trump cannot replicate the IEEPA tariffs in size, speed or impact with some BS “section whatever”. He lost big time.
Nope.
