How the Dissent in the Tariff Case Was Right and Roberts and the Others Were Wrong

[TheGreatSatan]

Stop being so damn predictable. It’s brainless and boring. Try adding something of substance for once

Your response is my reward.

America. If WEF/Democrat shillbots and NPCs aren't quoting your post with responses like this, then you're not trying hard enough.

Me

 

[TheGreatSatan]

The tariffs are a loser. Getting rid of them is only going to help our economy

If tariffs were bad, countries like Canada wouldn't have them on America.

America's friends don't tariff American goods.

Democrats support other nations having tariffs on America because Democrats are traitors working with the WEF to intentionally collapse America.

Democrats = traitors

 

[Dragonlady]

Very smart to say if.

Trump is an American president correctly elected by we Americans of the US.

That doesn’t mean he hasn’t been an agent of Russia since the turn of the century.

You elected the Manchurian candidate.

 

[Dragonlady]

If tariffs were bad, countries like Canada wouldn't have them on America.

America's friends don't tariff American goods.

Democrats support other nations having tariffs on America because Democrats are traitors working with the WEF to intentionally collapse America.

Democrats = traitors

We don’t have tariffs on you, dimwit.

We have a trade agreement which Trump negotiated and signed and now says is “stupid”.

I always said that Trump made such a bad deal that if he you ever wanted to renegotiate NAFTA again we’d be happy to negotiate with Trump.

Ever since Trump signed that deal, Canada’s trade surplus with the US has increased.

 

[Robert W]

That doesn’t mean he hasn’t been an agent of Russia since the turn of the century.

Why didn't you correctly say IF this time?

 

[Slade3200]

Your response is my reward.

America. If WEF/Democrat shillbots and NPCs aren't quoting your post with responses like this, then you're not trying hard enough.

Me

How did my post make you feel rewarded?

 

[Slade3200]

If tariffs were bad, countries like Canada wouldn't have them on America.

America's friends don't tariff American goods.

Democrats support other nations having tariffs on America because Democrats are traitors working with the WEF to intentionally collapse America.

Democrats = traitors

Tariffs are fine in the right situations. Trump doesn’t understand anything about them so what he’s doing is stupidity

 

[Robert W]

Tariffs are fine in the right situations. Trump doesn’t understand anything about them so what he’s doing is stupidity

Why are you upset that he forced other nations to reduce tariffs against us?

 

[TheGreatSatan]

How did my post make you feel rewarded?

The effort it took to create was my reward

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Tariffs are fine in the right situations. Trump doesn’t understand anything about them so what he’s doing is stupidity

So now tariffs are good... only when used against America?

Democrats = traitors

 

[Slade3200]

Why are you upset that he forced other nations to reduce tariffs against us?

I’m not upset. I’m just calling stupid stupid

 

[Slade3200]

The effort it took to create was my reward

Why’s that?

 

[Slade3200]

So now tariffs are good... only when used against America?

Democrats = traitors

Tarriffs are good when used correctly. Not in the way Trump was using them. That was illegal and also economically dumb

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Why’s that?

If I didn't strike a nerve, you would simply ignore my post and attack other targets. I take flak because I'm over the target.

Democrats = perverted freaks

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Tarriffs are good when used correctly. Not in the way Trump was using them. That was illegal and also economically dumb

Democrats believe tariffs used against America are correct and when America uses tariffs it's incorrect.

Democrats support other countries having tariffs on America because Democrats are traitors working to intentionally collapse America.

Democrats = traitors

 

[TheGreatSatan]

I’m not upset. I’m just calling stupid stupid

You wish those tariffs on America remained

Democrats = traitors

 

[Robert W]

I’m not upset. I’m just calling stupid stupid

Why is that?

 

[busybee01]

Congress has granted the Executive, under numerous statutes, to raise tariffs.

Clarence Thomas listed a number of these issues in his dissent.

Justice Kavanaugh also got it right.

"For both the Nixon tariffs and the Ford tariffs upheld by this Court in Algonquin, the relevant statutory provisions did not specifically refer to 'tariffs' or 'duties,' but instead more broadly authorized the President to 'regulate … importation' or to 'adjust the imports.' Therefore, when IEEPA was enacted in 1977 in the wake of the Nixon and Ford tariffs and the Algonquin decision, Congress and the public plainly would have understood that the power to 'regulate… importation' included tariffs."​

​

"If Congress wanted to exclude tariffs from IEEPA, it surely would not have enacted the same broad 'regulate… importation' language that had just been used to justify major American tariffs on foreign imports."​

​

He said that the plaintiffs in the case and the Supreme Court "acknowledge that IEEPA authorizes the President to impose quotas or embargoes on foreign imports—meaning that a President could completely block some or all imports," however, "they say that IEEPA does not authorize the President to employ the lesser power of tariffs, which simply condition imports on a payment."​

​

"As they interpret the statute, the President could, for example, block all imports from China but cannot order even a $1 tariff on goods imported from China."​

​

He continued, "That approach does not make much sense. Properly read, IEEPA does not draw such an odd distinction between quotas and embargoes on the one hand and tariffs on the other. Rather, it empowers the President to regulate imports during national emergencies with the tools Presidents have traditionally and commonly used, including quotas, embargoes, and tariffs."​

​

...​

Kavanaugh blasts SCOTUS reversal of Trump tariff plan, warns of ‘serious practical consequences’

“One issue will be refunds. Refunds of billions of dollars would have significant consequences for the U.S. Treasury.”

thepostmillennial.com

Kavanaugh got it wrong. The Congress cannot delegate its ability to tax to the executive branch. Even if it mentioned tariffs, it would be unconstitutional. Kavanaugh is a Trump toady who assaulted a woman and got away with it.

 

[busybee01]

Roberts and the democrats on the court are foreign agents, Barrett is blackmailed/compromised.

Democrats/RINOS = traitors

You are displaying your stupidity.

 

[busybee01]

That is precisely what Trump has been gung-ho to do.
his goal is to stop tariffs against the USA.

No he has not. Trump is the one causing tariffs against the US.