Hi Octoldit:
Thank you for starting this Disinformation Topic where these readers can learn better ways to spot DoD field operatives working this USMessageBoard. I just finished writing a post exposing
the most notable field op working this site (
here) and he just happens to be
the same guy responding to your Opening Post in
Post #2. I have years of experience dealing with DoD/FBI/CIA/NSA field ops running diversion for the
Official Bush/Obama Administration/DoD/FBI/Etc. Cover Story LIE and can post my findings on your thread to assist these readers to recognize these inside-job bad guys very quickly; but first I will respond to some of what appears in your OP itself:
Posted by: Clare Swinney [FONT="]⋅[/FONT] March 11, 2009
LINK:
Uncensored Magazine | How To Spot A Disinformation Agent
“Information warfare” is being waged throughout the cybersphere. Whether they are CENTCOM disinfo government employees or ill-informed know-it-alls, there has been an ugly battle raging on the Internet for the minds of the public. As any 9/11 truth activist who uses the web regularly can tell you, truth obfuscaters are crawling around message boards like locusts, referring to 9/11 truthers as “fringe nutcases,” “ridiculous,” “…fucking conspiracy theorists” and the like, while simultaeously hijacking rational discussions by planting bogus information. And no, jet fuel fires can not melt steel.
This description of DoD/FBI/CIA/NAS field ops working these Boards seems very limited in scope at best. I was accused of being a Disinfo Agent by a group of DoD Op retards working the LooseChange Board on
this thread (
link) back in October of 2007; which I quite frankly found hilarious. :0) The LC member posing as
“Pentagon Reality Check” (
this guy) is none other than
‘Caustic Logic’ a.k.a
“The Frustrating Fraud” (
blog) a.k.a
“Adam Larson” that I know very well. You can read Adam Larson’s criticisms of
my ‘two attack’ 9:32 AM Pentagon Explanation on
his blog (
here) where he posts a link to my debate with
“Honway” (another DoD field op)
here*. A listing of Adam’s rants against my Pentagon Explanations are
here if anybody is interested. I wrote a quick ‘comment’ against his nonsense to receive this reply:
Fraudblog
Fraud (Mark Larson) >> Eh, whatever. Guess I was wrong, huh?
Of course he is wrong like every other DoD Op running diversion for the DoD Cover Story. Honway ran away for a long time over our
9:38 AM Versus 9:32 AM First Explosion debate at the link above* ‘and’ Mark Larson went into retirement after our debate on this Pentagon Topic on this new Loose Change Board:
Mark Larson’s Final LC Post Thread
The
'deleted user' is “
PentagonRC” who I write to and said,
“The Official Cover Story guys (heh) have a very difficult job of selling that story, when they must take these opportunities to talk about ‘hole’ sizes in light of the missing 100-Ton Jetliner. :0) Mark’s final words were
“Huh. . . Yeah, hadn’t thought about it like that. Thanks. I am #27 on Mark’s
“Master List” (
here) BTW. Anyone wanting to see how
a real DoD Counterintelligence/Disinformation Operative really works these Boards can go through all of
Pentagon Reality Check’s posts from ‘both’ of these Loose Change Boards ‘and’ search for everything written by
“Frustrating Fraud” under the names of
Caustic Logic and
Mark Larson. This is just one of dozens of examples I can point out working all over the internet to help others learn to recognize their handiwork. The DoD Ops working this USMessageBoard are not nearly as well-trained as
Mark Larson, or
Michael Anderson (“Painter” = pilots for truth) or
Russell Pickering (from LC Board) or
Gravy (Mark Roberts =
my thread = JREF retard), or
Killtown (911Movement field op =
my thread), because (no offense, but) the typical USMessageBoard member/writer is really
not that sophisticated and up-to-date on the details surrounding these related 9/11 Inside-job Attacks.
The DoD assigns these cartoon characters according to
the ‘threat assessment status’ of
the contributing writer/members, as well as
the sophistication of the 911Truth Format itself. This place has one little room for ‘all’ conspiracies and I cannot even find one serious thesis paper on this Pentagon attack anywhere in the archives, so the DoD has no reason to send the big hired guns to spread Counterintelligence Disinformation Trash on this Board; which is the reason that you see
the one and two-liner distraction stupidity coming from
the few DoD Ops working this Board that merely throws dust in the air.
Naturally, it is not just information about what really happened on 9/11 that is under attack, the infowar is evident in relation to other topics that governments have a vested interest in lying about, such as chemtrails, mercury in vaccines leading to autism, AIDS/HIV being man-made, “man-made global warming” and the health effects of fluoride and depleted uranium (DU).
We agree. The difference is that We The People still have
‘time’ to backtrack and ‘solve’ these related 9/11 Inside-job Attacks, BEFORE the Inside-job Bad Guys have time to carry out the remainder of
their New World Order “Plan,” so keeping field ops in these vital 911Truth locations is important to perpetuating the 9/11 LIES
that keep a vast majority of Americans sound asleep. The DoD Counterintelligence/Disinformation Construct for this USMessageBoard Website is based upon
‘diversionary trickery’ more than
actual ‘Disinformation’ disguised as ‘the’ 911Truth. Why send your 175 I.Q. ‘three-dimensional-thinking’ DoD Field Op to razzle dazzle everybody, when all you need is a 90 I.Q. zombie/troll willing to simply throw tons of dust in the air? In short: I have seen
tons of these guys working these Discussion Boards and the cartoon characters around here represent
the very bottom of the DoD Op barrel. :0) Those among these members and readers
DUPED by these guys are not even paying attention . . .
The disinfo artists who work on the Internet, referred to as “trolls,” use a number of tried and tested means to mislead those who are trying to learn the truth about controversial issues, while attempting to make those disseminating the truth feel reluctant to continue. Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress The Truth -The Rules of Disinformation by H. Micheal Sweeney covers their methods in some detail.
No!! The
bottom rungs of the
DoD Counterintelligence/Disinformation Ladder include your
‘trolls’ who could not make a real 911Truth case
using ‘the evidence’ if their life depended on it. There is a
very wide spectrum of DoD Ops including the
‘troll-types’ and
the highly sophisticated-types assigned to Boards like LooseChange, 911Movement, AE911Truth.org, PilotsForTruth, JREF and so forth. You cannot toss all DoD Ops into the same little pot, because
these DoD assets are ‘tools’ for a variety of different environments and objectives. If nobody on a particular Board is presenting ‘the’ 911Truth, then
the DoD handler has no reason to pull out and deploy a sophisticated tool. :0)
Their dirty work does have some positive spin-offs for those who care about the truth however. For one thing, if they argue incessantly about a particular topic, they are waving a flag and telling you indirectly that this is an issue you should be particularly concerned about.
I have learned many things about ‘the’ 911Truth from DoD field ops that never crossed my mind until our heated debating encounters. The DoD ops to teach me the most about the Pentagon Case in the shortest time was a combination of
Russell Pickering and
YCHTT on
my LC Thread here (
link) and starting at
this very post (
link).
YouCantHandleTheTruth is an Arlington County Firefighter who opened up my eyes to
‘the’ truth that a real Jet ‘did’ in fact strike the Pentagon, which changed me from being a “No-planer” during this debate. Note that
“Russell Pickering” (
link = from
PentagonResearch.com = now shut down ) is the DoD field op who became
the ‘unregistered user’ in this case. Russell Pickering is
the DoD ‘hander’ (
some releated info) who started the LooseChange Brats off in the beginning and now runs the show from behind the scenes . . .
And secondly, when they quarrel about a little-known area, they are often helping those they engage with gain more knowledge. Not because of the misleading information they post, but because arguing with them can lead people to do far more research than they would have done otherwise.
The
‘sophisticated’ DoD field op oftentimes helps
the ‘trained’ 911Truther locate that difficult-to-find information to connect all the dots, but the seemingly stupid DoD bottom-of-the-barrel types simply
do not have enough 911Truth knowledge to make any intelligent contributions one way or the other. The highly sophisticated DoD field ops like the
CIT retards (
their website =
my pic) are in the business of creating
a myriad of ‘rabbit holes’ leading everywhere and ‘nowhere,’ as they care
only about what ‘did not’ hit the Pentagon and throwing hundreds of theories around to confuse everybody. These CIT guys work under
Michael Anderson ('Painter' from Pilots for truth) who was a registered member at
AE911truth.org with me and Russell Pickering where I got to know these clowns very well indeed. You can see how
a real DoD handler supports
his field ops and
their assets by simply reading my debate with
Aldo and Craig (CIT retards) on
this thread here.
And lastly, I highlight
12 things that a real Disinformation Agent ‘will’ do and
10 things that a real Disinformation Agent ‘will not’ do in this LS Post (
link*) to help these readers sharpen their Disinfo Agent-recognizing skills. :0)
PS. Mr. Gullible from that post* is Craig Ranke from CIT.
------------------
Twelve Things A Disinfo Agent 'Will' Do:
1. Drill the
9:38 AM and 9:43 AM crash times into your head like there is no tomorrow.
2. Point to the
ACAAR and content like that is the Bible.
3. Push
the loyalty and credibility of ‘firemen’ in support of
the false ACAAR testimony.
4. Generally refer to 911Truthers as
“Conspiracy Theorists” or “CT’ers or 'trofers/troffers.'
5. Discredits witness testimony intimating
a ‘pre-9:38 AM’ Pentagon attack.
6. Supports
the Official Government Cover Stories divided by average member perceptions. That means if most everyone on a Board accepts one explanation (missile, flyover, A-3 Jet, etc.), then his programming says to adopt a version along those lines to develop a strategy backtracking to the Official Cover Story.
7. Prefer to
ask leading questions rather than offer real arguments.
8. Avoids
in-depth debates that will expose his position.
9.
Spread disinformation without defending anything.
10. Offers
common sense explanations towards his position rather than produce technically-sound arguments.
11. Present many
Post-collapse E-Ring wall images.
12. Connect all references to the ‘explosion’ to Flight 77 and
the 9:38 AM event.
Ten Things A Disinfo Agent Will NOT Do:
1. Make references to
9:31 AM and 9:32 AM evidence in this Pentagon case. The ACAAR never mentions these times even once.
2. Support
any missile theory at all. That happened at
9:31:39 AM and his job is to hide that fact.
3. Connect engine debris to anything other than
a Boeing 757-200 Jetliner.
4. Present
many Pre-collapse Pentagon E-Ring wall images.
5. Stand toe to toe with any
well-organized 911Truther and debate these topics.
6. Support theories
opposing the Official DoD Cover Story.
7. Give verbal support
to any member opposing the Official DoD Cover Story.
8. Use the term
‘explosions’ (plural) in his work. This term does not appear in the ACAAR or the 911Commission Report even once.
9. Speak derogatorily about
the DoD, federal officers or any ‘authority’ over these Pentagon events.
10. Show
any support for Conspiracy Theories in general.
----------------
GL,
Terral
