How to prevent the left from putting an end to free speech

[g5000]

Someone donates to an organization that campaigns to stop same sex marriage. Under an FOIA request, an LGBT group acquires the list of donors to that organization and then starts harassing the donors. Egging their houses, keying their cars, telephonic death threats, and so forth. Thus scaring people into not making any donations to organizations unliked by the mob.

This type of suppression of the exercise of free speech certainly should be addressed.

However, this may all be a giant Trojan horse whose true aim is to make dark donations by large donors even darker under the guise of protecting ordinary people from harassment by crazed hippies.

Discuss.

 

[koshergrl]

Jackboots DEFINE freedom, you poor slobs!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Open Carry protests outside of "free speech zones" on college campuses would be the best way.

Why yes, because nothing shows that you love free speech more than threatening to kill other people with a weapon should they open their mouths.

Bravo. Interesting and creative system. I think there is a name for it.

Oh yeah: totalitarianism.

DO this mean all police carrying a firearm on campus are threatening to kill others?

It means that you're typical of most on the right with regard to your ignorance of the law.

 

[Statistikhengst]

The “Free Speech Privacy Act” is needless idiocy, representative of the ignorance common to most on the right, the OP in particular.

There is ample and comprehensive First Amendment jurisprudence available to the American people as a recourse to measures they perceive to violate their right to free speech.

"It’s within this framework that liberals have been making a concerted effort to destroy their enemies—those who support liberty and individual choice."

Liberals' 'enemies' certainly aren't conservatives, as most on the right are hostile to liberty and individual choice – where conservatives seek to violate a woman's right to choice with regard to having a child or not, gay Americans' choice as whom to marry, and transgender Americans' choice as how to best conduct their lives.

Indeed, most conservatives are hostile to diversity, dissent, and expressions of individual liberty, the OP herself has provided abundant evidence of her own intolerance for diversity and hostility toward those who make choices that conflict with her errant and subjective religious and political dogma.

 

[koshergrl]

 

[g5000]

Again, how do we protect people who are threatened after making donations to an organization that is hated by the mob? Their names appear on a list of donors. This list can be used to identify targets for harassment.

 

[koshergrl]

Statist's porn:

 

[g5000]

A hippie makes a donation to a gun control lobbying organization. A week later, he is followed everywhere he goes by an armed member of the NRA.

See the problem?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Open Carry protests outside of "free speech zones" on college campuses would be the best way.

Why yes, because nothing shows that you love free speech more than threatening to kill other people with a weapon should they open their mouths.

Bravo. Interesting and creative system. I think there is a name for it.

Oh yeah: totalitarianism.

DO this mean all police carrying a firearm on campus are threatening to kill others?

Are you equating trained police officers with gunnutz`?

Seeing they shoot people in the back 5 times and then laugh about it and plant tasers on them, and registered gun owners rarely ever use their firearm to kill anyone, I'd say the police are far more threatening than legal non-police gun owners.

So not, I'm not equating them to "trained police officers," I'm pedestalizing them compared to police.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Open Carry protests outside of "free speech zones" on college campuses would be the best way.

Why yes, because nothing shows that you love free speech more than threatening to kill other people with a weapon should they open their mouths.

Bravo. Interesting and creative system. I think there is a name for it.

Oh yeah: totalitarianism.

DO this mean all police carrying a firearm on campus are threatening to kill others?

Are you equating trained police officers with gunnutz`?

Seeing they shoot people in the back 5 times and then laugh about it and plant tasers on them, and registered gun owners rarely ever use their firearm to kill anyone, I'd say the police are far more threatening than legal non-police gun owners.

So not, I'm not equating them to "trained police officers," I'm pedestalizing them compared to police.

120,000 paid cops in the USA. 3 to 4 incidents of the type you describe, per year. Incredibly low percentage of cops who do this. Of course, it should never happen. But you blame all of coppery for this?

 

[koshergrl]

Open Carry protests outside of "free speech zones" on college campuses would be the best way.

Why yes, because nothing shows that you love free speech more than threatening to kill other people with a weapon should they open their mouths.

Bravo. Interesting and creative system. I think there is a name for it.

Oh yeah: totalitarianism.

DO this mean all police carrying a firearm on campus are threatening to kill others?

Are you equating trained police officers with gunnutz`?

Seeing they shoot people in the back 5 times and then laugh about it and plant tasers on them, and registered gun owners rarely ever use their firearm to kill anyone, I'd say the police are far more threatening than legal non-police gun owners.

So not, I'm not equating them to "trained police officers," I'm pedestalizing them compared to police.

120,000 paid cops in the USA. 3 to 4 incidents of the type you describe, per year. Incredibly low percentage of cops who do this. Of course, it should never happen. But you blame all of coppery for this?

3-4 incidents?

Are you doing flakka?

Here's 11 "incidents" right here...one per each of your friends:

 

[daws101]

We all know that the left is committed to destroying free speech. Democrats are the party of "do what I say, not as I do..." also known as "It's okay for me..but not for you." They claim to embrace individual liberty..while at the same time advocating for government-mandated *equality* that literally forces people to act in ways that diametrically oppose their personal convictions.

"....the ends always justify the means for the leftist movement, principles be damned.
"It’s within this framework that liberals have been making a concerted effort to destroy their enemies—those who support liberty and individual choice."

"For many American liberals, you only have rights if you agree with their causes. If you disagree, you need to be silenced—and quickly."

The cure:

".... the “Free Speech Privacy Act,” would act as a “federalism shield” for free speech, “prohibiting the enforcement [by the states] of any law directly or indirectly conditioning the exercise of the rights of free speech and association on the disclosure of the identity of a person or entity who fears a reasonable probability of social, political, or economic retaliation from such disclosure.”
"The second proposed reform, named the “Publius Confidentiality Act,” would allow any individual to register a confidential identifier for use in political activities. This would make it even more difficult for groups to retaliate using personal attacks against people they disagree with. It was inspired by identity shield laws that protect victims of domestic violence.
"These reforms would ensure people could freely donate funds or engage in political activities without fear of being “exposed” for simply exercising their guaranteed freedoms, a principle that was an essential part of the United States’ founding."

The Left s Hidden Plan to End Free Speech and Two Ways to Stop It - Justin Haskins - Page 2

 

[Billy000]

I don't understand how you people buy into such non sense. What the fuck would democrats have to gain by trying to end free speech?

 

[koshergrl]

I don't understand how you people buy into such non sense. What the fuck would democrats have to gain by trying to end free speech?

They say there is no such thing as a dumb question. They lie.

 

[daws101]

The Left’s Hidden Plan to End Free Speech is obviously not hidden if it were then the dumbfuck who wrote it, would not have.
like all the shit kosher hag posts it's nonsense.
if you folks hadn't noticed she's on a posting jag, guess her welfare check arrived ..

 

[daws101]

I don't understand how you people buy into such non sense. What the fuck would democrats have to gain by trying to end free speech?

They say there is no such thing as a dumb question. They lie.

true ,but they were referring to people like you.

 

[Syriusly]

We all know that the left is committed to destroying free speech.

"We" meaning right wing nutjobs like yourself.

 

[HenryBHough]

Aw, Daws, thank you for reminding me of the good old days when "sped" was the past tense of a verb pertaining to rate of motion.

 

[daws101]

Open Carry protests outside of "free speech zones" on college campuses would be the best way.

Why yes, because nothing shows that you love free speech more than threatening to kill other people with a weapon should they open their mouths.

Bravo. Interesting and creative system. I think there is a name for it.

Oh yeah: totalitarianism.

DO this mean all police carrying a firearm on campus are threatening to kill others?

Silly, martial law is in NO WAY ever related to totalitarianism! Stormtroopers marching the streets to keep those nasty individuals quiet in their houses is just democracy in action!

 

[mdk]

Drama queens!