Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, the point is there is no MEASURABLE human input to global warming.
Period.
Dumbass what was mileage of cares in fifties sixties and seventies.......on avg,,,,,if your complaint is it hasnt improved maybe the govt should get out of the business of mpg mandates eh........rube
If your claim is govt regulations have done nothing perhaps we don't need them to rescue us. .....How have cars changed since the time frame you mentioned, jerkoff. They got smaller, lighter and more aerodynamic. What does any of that have to do with the efficiency of the engines in them.
Read what the title of the thread says. The point here is how to fix human caused global warming. Now if you want to go into what is measurable in human caused global warming, go to my thread, "Golbal warming. Kiss your ass goodbye." In the thread I posted a number of graphs that show all sorts of measurements. Go there and have at it.
So you think a carbureted fuel system is as efficient as direct port electronic fuel injection? Lol
I meant we have to do some widescale experiments that will determine if we can actually reduce the 'warming' enough to mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases.
I posted a link to a website there. You can either agree or disagree with it.
You suck.
I can understand and fully sympathize with someone worried about everyone's carbon footprint. But when you declare that there is something distinct about the carbon footprint of immigrants I know you for someone possessing an insupportable bias.
Yes, I'm still laughing about your stupid link.
Have you realized the problem yet?
Do you actually believe engines back then were more efficient than engines in 2003?
If your claim is govt regulations have done nothing perhaps we don't need them to rescue us. .....
Quibbling about the efficiency between cars now and what they were in the 1980's isn't going to cut it.
Well we know what is causing it. All we need to do is reverse what is causing it.
That's not what your link claimed.
It claimed a 1908 Model T was more fuel efficient than
a 2003 Ford Explorer SUV.
View attachment 654378
Do you believe that is an accurate claim?
That's not what your link claimed.
It claimed a 1908 Model T was more fuel efficient than
a 2003 Ford Explorer SUV.
View attachment 654378
Do you believe that is an accurate claim?
25 MPG vs 16 MPG. Seems pretty clear cut to me.
