How to end poverty in America.

Jesus is a fiction, but the Warren Report is factual. Lol.

What kind of a fucked up person believes such immense absurdity?
WHat kind of retard says such stupid crap as you without evidence

Yes the Warren Commission report is accurate

YOU have never posted evidence to the contrary

Jesus is fictional prove me wrong little boy

Your taunts are not evidence and you are not a bright person. Offer evidence instead
 
That is very debatable opinion and nothing more

WHat kind of retard says such stupid crap as you without evidence

Yes the Warren Commission report is accurate

YOU have never posted evidence to the contrary

Jesus is fictional prove me wrong little boy

Your taunts are not evidence and you are not a bright person. Offer evidence instead
You would first have to prove that he was fictional, like the Soup Nazi. That's how it works.
 
You would first have to prove that he was fictional, like the Soup Nazi. That's how it works.
No the burden is on gipper who has NEVER tried to post evidence of any kind for any of his claims
 
Capitalism doesn't require millions of idle people lying around living off the workers. That's socialism.
That is not socialism, that is being a bum...unless you really need it, then it is called humanity.
 
That is not socialism, that is being a bum...unless you really need it, then it is called humanity.
If the government approves and supports them with the worker's dollars, it's Socialism. If the private sector supports them, it's charity.
 
Last edited:
If the government approves and supports it with the worker's dollars, it's Socialism.
Socialism like when Nippon Steel bought US Steel and gave Trump a controlling share? That kind of socialism or social supplied welfare.
Socialism is a political and economic system where the means of production (like factories, land, and resources) are owned and controlled, typically by the state or the community as a whole, rather than by private individuals or corporations. This differs from capitalism, where private individuals or companies own the means of production.
 
Socialism like when Nippon Steel bought US Steel and gave Trump a controlling share? That kind of socialism or social supplied welfare.
Socialism is a political and economic system where the means of production (like factories, land, and resources) are owned and controlled, typically by the state or the community as a whole, rather than by private individuals or corporations. This differs from capitalism, where private individuals or companies own the means of production.
I was stretching it a bit.
 
If the government approves and supports them with the worker's dollars, it's Socialism. If the private sector supports them, it's charity.
Defining "socialism" solely based on government approval and support using workers' dollars can be misleading and oversimplified.
Here's a more nuanced understanding:
  • Socialism is an economic and political ideology that advocates for social ownership or control of the means of production and distribution of goods and services, aiming for a more equitable society. This can manifest in various ways, including:
    • Government/State Ownership: Where the government directly owns and operates key industries like healthcare, education, or utilities.
    • Worker Cooperatives: Businesses owned and managed by their employees.
    • Community/Collective Ownership: Resources and enterprises held and managed by the broader community.
  • Democratic Socialism: This form of socialism emphasizes achieving socialist goals through democratic means, often involving a mixed economy where a degree of private ownership exists alongside government-provided services and social safety nets funded through taxation. Examples of these government services include public education, healthcare, and infrastructure, all funded by citizens' taxes.
  • Government Intervention vs. Socialism: While government intervention, such as providing social welfare programs or regulating industries, is a feature often associated with socialist policies, it's not the sole determinant of whether an economy is socialist. Many capitalist countries also have government programs and regulations aimed at addressing market failures, promoting social well-being, or managing the economy.
In essence, government approval and funding are components that might be present in a socialist system, but they don't fully encompass the complex and varied definitions of socialism.
 
15th post
Defining "socialism" solely based on government approval and support using workers' dollars can be misleading and oversimplified.
Here's a more nuanced understanding:
  • Socialism is an economic and political ideology that advocates for social ownership or control of the means of production and distribution of goods and services, aiming for a more equitable society. This can manifest in various ways, including:
    • Government/State Ownership: Where the government directly owns and operates key industries like healthcare, education, or utilities.
    • Worker Cooperatives: Businesses owned and managed by their employees.
    • Community/Collective Ownership: Resources and enterprises held and managed by the broader community.
  • Democratic Socialism: This form of socialism emphasizes achieving socialist goals through democratic means, often involving a mixed economy where a degree of private ownership exists alongside government-provided services and social safety nets funded through taxation. Examples of these government services include public education, healthcare, and infrastructure, all funded by citizens' taxes.
  • Government Intervention vs. Socialism: While government intervention, such as providing social welfare programs or regulating industries, is a feature often associated with socialist policies, it's not the sole determinant of whether an economy is socialist. Many capitalist countries also have government programs and regulations aimed at addressing market failures, promoting social well-being, or managing the economy.
In essence, government approval and funding are components that might be present in a socialist system, but they don't fully encompass the complex and varied definitions of socialism.
I was stretching the meaning a bit.
 
What many humans can't conceive, we are rich, we are wealthy, we have it made...Why complain?
 
Back
Top Bottom