How the November Election was probably stolen...without a trace

There are many villains in America losing

Well, as that pertains specifically to Don Trump, the answers are readily available (there is a 27-page report to it linked in some thread nearby)......anyway the answers are available

To wit:

More folks (+8million more) thought that Don Trump was untrustworthy and incompetent ........ than .......there were folks who thought he wasn't either of those things.

So there is that.




ps....google up Tony Fabizio's 'autopsy' of Trump's loss. Read all 27-pages of his report (btw, commissioned and paid for by Don Trump)......it will enlighten you. And hopefully, allay much of your angst. IMHO


Trump didn't lose. He won the Electoral College.

The Democrats stole the EC from Trump with the scam of unverified mail in ballots in Democrats controlled swing districts.

In their zeal to make America a Socialist shithole not only did the Democrat filth steal an election but they stole our Democracy.

Shame on all the parties that allowed it to happen.
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.
The Federalist?
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.

Shame on the America people for allowing the election to be stolen.

There are many villains in America losing its democracy; Democrat Dirty Tricks Department, the Chinese, Useful Idiot Moon Bats and the cowardly Legislature and Courts.

Yet only one party and one former President tried to preemptively and violently overthrow a newly elected President by attacking the Joint session of Congress while they were counting EC votes. Furthermore, the Constitution doesn't confer on Congress or the VP the power to overturn a States Certified EC votes.
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.

Shame on the America people for allowing the election to be stolen.

There are many villains in America losing its democracy; Democrat Dirty Tricks Department, the Chinese, Useful Idiot Moon Bats and the cowardly Legislature and Courts.

Yet only one party and one former President tried to preemptively and violently overthrow a newly elected President by attacking the Joint session of Congress while they were counting EC votes. Furthermore, the Constitution doesn't confer on Congress or the VP the power to overturn a States Certified EC votes.
If it comes to it we will not back this nation up. Understand that. We are more regional now then ever.
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.

Shame on the America people for allowing the election to be stolen.

There are many villains in America losing its democracy; Democrat Dirty Tricks Department, the Chinese, Useful Idiot Moon Bats and the cowardly Legislature and Courts.

Yet only one party and one former President tried to preemptively and violently overthrow a newly elected President by attacking the Joint session of Congress while they were counting EC votes. Furthermore, the Constitution doesn't confer on Congress or the VP the power to overturn a States Certified EC votes.
If it comes to it we will not back this nation up. Understand that. We are more regional now then ever.

I never figured that you would ever have this nations back, or do what's good for the nation.
 
... this election was stolen.
One does not need to be a crackpot cultist to fantasize that the Cry Baby Loser had won "in a landslide!" rather than the American electorate dumping him at their first opportunity, having consistently and relentlessly expressed their disapproval of him for four years, but being a paranoid certainly helps in swallowing such a vast, multi-leveled, bipartisan covert conspiracy with so many Republican officials and judges in cahoots.

The one, consistent, unifying factor of all the crackpots: Whom they support.

How did Dominion fail to "fix" elections in 18 of the 24 states in which their machines were used?
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.
I can show you more evidence republicans stole 2000. And republicans tried to steal this years election with many of the same tactics including in 2000 republicans started a riot and stopped the Florida recount.

Only this time trump lost five states. It was too big to rig.
oh please show us. The court said otherwise after made up chad ballots started to materialize again, and again. dude, the demofks cheat. it's well known. Look it up online using Chicago as your reference.
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.

Shame on the America people for allowing the election to be stolen.

There are many villains in America losing its democracy; Democrat Dirty Tricks Department, the Chinese, Useful Idiot Moon Bats and the cowardly Legislature and Courts.

Yet only one party and one former President tried to preemptively and violently overthrow a newly elected President by attacking the Joint session of Congress while they were counting EC votes. Furthermore, the Constitution doesn't confer on Congress or the VP the power to overturn a States Certified EC votes.
If it comes to it we will not back this nation up. Understand that. We are more regional now then ever.

I never figured that you would ever have this nations back, or do what's good for the nation.
how do the demofks have this nation's back exactly?
 
We will never have another honest election. Our Democracy is kaput.

The Democrats have learned how to create unverified ballots in Democrat controlled swing districts that have little or no voter identification requirements.

The Democrats create the fraudulent ballots and do the counting. Absolutely no traceability. They will always come up with whatever they need. Just like they did last November.

We are allowing the butt pirate to steal our country because we don't have the courage to do the right thing.
 
... this election was stolen.
One does not need to be a crackpot cultist to fantasize that the Cry Baby Loser had won "in a landslide!" rather than the American electorate dumping him at their first opportunity, having consistently and relentlessly expressed their disapproval of him for four years, but being a paranoid certainly helps in swallowing such a vast, multi-leveled, bipartisan covert conspiracy with so many Republican officials and judges in cahoots.

The one, consistent, unifying factor of all the crackpots: Whom they support.

How did Dominion fail to "fix" elections in 18 of the 24 states in which their machines were used?
There's no way to deal with them on this topic. Among others.

They're so emotionally invested in this man that they simply can't grasp the fact that a majority of us are not.

So in their minds, something must be wrong, somebody must have cheated. And that's that.
 
I enjoy this stuff and checking into local sources of the situation. It took no more than a few seconds to quickly glance at the OP's attached article to find mention of an example. The one I came across was Coffee County, Georgia and then read a few news stories from that state about the situation. If this is the stuff the Trumpsters want to hang their hat on, that's fine, I figure their joy must come from wallowing in self pity.
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.

Shame on the America people for allowing the election to be stolen.

There are many villains in America losing its democracy; Democrat Dirty Tricks Department, the Chinese, Useful Idiot Moon Bats and the cowardly Legislature and Courts.

Yet only one party and one former President tried to preemptively and violently overthrow a newly elected President by attacking the Joint session of Congress while they were counting EC votes. Furthermore, the Constitution doesn't confer on Congress or the VP the power to overturn a States Certified EC votes.
If it comes to it we will not back this nation up. Understand that. We are more regional now then ever.

I never figured that you would ever have this nations back, or do what's good for the nation.
how do the demofks have this nation's back exactly?

I don't recall any of them ever saying "If it comes to it we will not back this nation up".

But then again, dems never supported a preemptive, violent overthrow of a newly elected president by attacking the Joint session of Congress while they were counting EC votes on the hope that that would somehow validate the loser as the next president........

Seriously, anyone who support a violent overthrow of our constitution can't say they back this nation anyway can they?
 
I love the OP's headline ---- 'steal the election without leaving a trace'.

Those "without a trace" crimes are always fun.
I mean, how do you know a crime even took place.....if no trace.
Of course, in this case, the Branch Trumpidians believe it was stolen because.....well, because their moke didn't win.
Ipso facto, a 'theft' occurred. No never mind the 8 million more votes to the other moke. No never mind the findings by their moke's pollster, Fabrizio, that more folks thought their moke was untrustworthy and incompetent, than the folks who thought he wasn't either of those things.

So, it's kinda sorta an arithmetic exercise. If you get my drift.

So then, let's segue into these throbbing rhetorical questions posted by the OP:


The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

First, why 40% convinced it was fixed? Umm, there are many reasons. The most pejorative are likely------

  1. blind partisanship;
  2. ignorance of election procedures;
  3. bad math skills;
  4. cult-think;
  5. and blind partisanship.
There may be others. I'll leave it to others to articulate.
.........................................................................................................................

Then "Why ...not an armed rebellion"?

Ummmm, poster, I have no intention of embarrassing you, but......but you haven't seen any reportage from, oh about, January 6th onward?
Really?

OK, lemme help you: There WAS an armed rebellion. But it failed.

It was planned, organized, and attempted by.......well, by incompetent fatboy militia jackass-patriots who have failed in much of their life's endeavors, and did so again on January 6th.

I realize that may sound harsh to some. It is not meant that way.
"Branch Trumpidians"

rotfl-gif.288736
 
There are many villains in America losing

Well, as that pertains specifically to Don Trump, the answers are readily available (there is a 27-page report to it linked in some thread nearby)......anyway the answers are available

To wit:

More folks (+8million more) thought that Don Trump was untrustworthy and incompetent ........ than .......there were folks who thought he wasn't either of those things.

So there is that.




ps....google up Tony Fabizio's 'autopsy' of Trump's loss. Read all 27-pages of his report (btw, commissioned and paid for by Don Trump)......it will enlighten you. And hopefully, allay much of your angst. IMHO


Trump didn't lose. He won the Electoral College.

The Democrats stole the EC from Trump with the scam of unverified mail in ballots in Democrats controlled swing districts.

In their zeal to make America a Socialist shithole not only did the Democrat filth steal an election but they stole our Democracy.

Shame on all the parties that allowed it to happen.
Don't worry, Biden will pick up the investigation into election fraud that Trump abandoned a couple of years ago and he'll get to the bottom of it.
thumbsup.gif
 

The linked article is quite detailed and assumes that the reader has both a three-digit IQ and an attention span greater than that of a common housefly, but it outlines and clearly explains the phoniness of the "no evidence" and "80 courts have spoken" Narratives about this past Presidential election.

There are ultimately three or four different lines of legitimate inquiry - all involving apparent election wrongdoing - in which various courts chose, either through cowardice (USSC) or political expediency (PA Supreme Court), to reject cases and possible serious inquiries into activities that very easily could have reversed the electoral results in enough states to shift the ultimate result to President Trump.

The main question quickly shifts from "why is 40% of the electorate convinced that the election was fixed?" to "Why is there not an armed rebellion over this electoral travesty?"

I don't expect the Leftists here to read this; they are blinded by whatever-it-is, but the facts are what they are, and this election was stolen. Sorry.

Shame on the America people for allowing the election to be stolen.

There are many villains in America losing its democracy; Democrat Dirty Tricks Department, the Chinese, Useful Idiot Moon Bats and the cowardly Legislature and Courts.

Yet only one party and one former President tried to preemptively and violently overthrow a newly elected President by attacking the Joint session of Congress while they were counting EC votes. Furthermore, the Constitution doesn't confer on Congress or the VP the power to overturn a States Certified EC votes.
If it comes to it we will not back this nation up. Understand that. We are more regional now then ever.
Who needs you?
 
We will never have another honest election. Our Democracy is kaput.

The Democrats have learned how to create unverified ballots in Democrat controlled swing districts that have little or no voter identification requirements.

The Democrats create the fraudulent ballots and do the counting. Absolutely no traceability. They will always come up with whatever they need. Just like they did last November.

We are allowing the butt pirate to steal our country because we don't have the courage to do the right thing.
Then you should never be complicit and vote again.
 
There's no way to deal with them on this topic. Among others.

They're so emotionally invested in this man that they simply can't grasp the fact that a majority of us are not.

So in their minds, something must be wrong, somebody must have cheated. And that's that.
It does come down to the emotional nature of a cult being impervious to reason. The vast conspiracy they contrive will simply expand to encompass the entire universe if that is what they need to cling to it.

Why do not all the Tump bum kisser media outlets provide the detailed evidence that all the courts conspired to dismiss as being without merit?

They all must be in cahoots as well!
Screen Shot 2021-03-15 at 12.22.35 PM.png


The simple, reasonable, Occam's Razor alternative to their irrational, byzantine, convoluted, covert, vast conspiracy? Seven-million more Americans voted for Biden, consistent with disapproving of him for four years, giving him 306 electoral votes as certified by Congress and the Vice President despite Trump's goons attacking it.
 
When we lost truth and decency, we also lost trust. Going forward, the losers of every election in our future will claim that the results are fraudulent. They will state that there's tons of proof that isn't being examined thoroughly.

Oh joy!
 

Forum List

Back
Top