How should we punish communitst China for COVID 19 deaths and economic woes?

[SassyIrishLass]

China makes one move military at sea and a US fast attack takes them out....then a boomer steps in.

Reality...my papa learned me well.

 

[B. Kidd]

And since China IS mainly an export economy, explains why they let the Wuhanvirus spread to the rest of the globe!
They figured that their economy was not going to go down alone!!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

And since China IS mainly an export economy, explains why they let the Wuhanvirus spread to the rest of the globe!
They figured that their economy was not going to go down alone!!

They export shit....but need imports for corn, wheat, pork, beef, etc

It's an end game

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Yep. They attacked the world with a WMD. What does that call for?

It is readily apparent to even the most casual observer that you don't know what a WMD is, or you wouldn't have made such an moronic statement.

Gas, bio, nuke — all WMD.

Naturally occurring viruses that have not been weaponized are not WMD's. But, keep up with the hysteria if that is what helps you sleep at night.

Me? I was a part of the CBR warfare teams when I was in the Navy. It was called CBR (Chemical, Biological, Radiological) back when I was on my first command back in '83.

I also got to serve on the PRP (Personal Reliability Program), where we loaded nukes onto FA-18's. So yeah, I had to learn what WMDs were, how they operated, and what to do if they were used against us. Sorry, but there is nothing that points towards this virus being a WMD except in your own fevered imagination.

Anthrax is naturally occurring and has been weaponized, too. You play in the weeds and I’ll deal with reality.

Do you even know what it takes to weaponize anthrax? You have to get the particles small enough to float in the air as an aerosol for a long time. And no, naturally occurring anthrax isn't automatically weaponized. It has to go through a lot of processing to be used as a weapon.

Like I said, I worked on the teams dealing with WMD's, from biological and chemical, all the way up to nuclear. How many teams were you on?

I lived in the DC area when weaponized anthrax was being sent through the mail.

Educate yourself.

A silent bomb: The risk of anthrax as a weapon of mass destruction

No rational person can deny the destructive potential of a nuclear bomb as a weapon of mass destruction (WMD). The perception of anthrax as a WMD, however, is yet unformed in our society and its institutions. Opinions on anthrax WMD have ranged from dire to dismissive (1, 2), but a...

www.pnas.org

Public misconceptions exist in the areas of treatment, prevention, detection, and destructiveness with regard to the character of anthrax. First of all, it is not the bacteria, Bacillus anthracis, that poses the greatest risk, but its dry concentrated spores. Inhaled spores, several microns in diameter, reach deep into the lungs, then travel to lymph nodes, replicate in the blood, and produce toxins that cause mortal illness (4). Medical intervention may be successful, but timing is critical. Postexposure oral antibiotic prophylaxis is efficacious if begun during the presymptomatic incubation stage. Combination antibiotics and aggressive hospital supportive care may also succeed in the prodromal stage, but the disease is beyond treatment and inevitably fatal once the fulminant stage is reached (5). Vaccination is believed effective, although complete immunity requires a series of six shots over 18 months, followed by annual booster shots (6).


And, anthrax in an envelope ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it only affects a limited amount of people. In order to weaponize anthrax to make it a WMD, it has to go through a lot of processing to get to the spores.

And...................you might do yourself some good to find out what a WMD actually is..................

Weapon of mass destruction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or any other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to numerous humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g., buildings), natural structures (e.g., mountains), or the biosphere. The scope and usage of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Originally coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives during World War II, it has later come to refer to large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear warfare.


In the very definition, it says it brings harm to numerous humans and great damage to human made structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. Sorry, but an envelope with some anthrax bacteria doesn't qualify. Refine it down to the spores so that it can stay in the air for a long time, and get a successful delivery system to put it in the air, and THEN you have a WMD. Envelopes don't qualify, but keep up with the hysterics if it makes you feel better.

I don’t give a rat‘s ass about your experience nor your nomenclature. Liberal isn’t liberal so I don’t use that term while many others do, do you?
A weapon that results in mass destruction, in my mind, is a weapon of mass destruction.

An envelope with a bit of anthrax in it ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it will generally only affect the person it is mailed to (or the people that open their mail for them), meaning a limited amount of damage, so therefore, it's not a weapon of mass destruction. And, interestingly enough, very few people who received those envelopes got sick, and nobody died as far as I'm aware of.

If it doesn't kill lots of people or do lots of damage, it's not a weapon of mass destruction, no matter what your fevered mind tells you. Sorry, but I was in the military, as well as served on the teams that dealt with WMD's, so I think I understand them a bit better than you do.

Apparently, the reason you don't care about nomenclature is because you don't know what it actually means, so instead of learning and educating yourself, you choose to remain stupid.

And, the reason I call you stupid is because of the following quote........

"Ignorance is when you never had the chance to learn. Stupidity is when you had the chance, but didn't bother. It's quite okay to be ignorant, just don't be stupid."

You need to apply your last paragraph to yourself. I was explicit in my take of WMD and it even fit part of your condescending criteria.
Get over yourself.
And, as an American, I will use descriptions I feel are appropriate and allow you to do the same. You take your speech-stifling censorship back to your commie navy. (You didn’t explain what navy you were part of)

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Yep. They attacked the world with a WMD. What does that call for?

It is readily apparent to even the most casual observer that you don't know what a WMD is, or you wouldn't have made such an moronic statement.

Gas, bio, nuke — all WMD.

Naturally occurring viruses that have not been weaponized are not WMD's. But, keep up with the hysteria if that is what helps you sleep at night.

Me? I was a part of the CBR warfare teams when I was in the Navy. It was called CBR (Chemical, Biological, Radiological) back when I was on my first command back in '83.

I also got to serve on the PRP (Personal Reliability Program), where we loaded nukes onto FA-18's. So yeah, I had to learn what WMDs were, how they operated, and what to do if they were used against us. Sorry, but there is nothing that points towards this virus being a WMD except in your own fevered imagination.

Anthrax is naturally occurring and has been weaponized, too. You play in the weeds and I’ll deal with reality.

Do you even know what it takes to weaponize anthrax? You have to get the particles small enough to float in the air as an aerosol for a long time. And no, naturally occurring anthrax isn't automatically weaponized. It has to go through a lot of processing to be used as a weapon.

Like I said, I worked on the teams dealing with WMD's, from biological and chemical, all the way up to nuclear. How many teams were you on?

I lived in the DC area when weaponized anthrax was being sent through the mail.

Educate yourself.

A silent bomb: The risk of anthrax as a weapon of mass destruction

No rational person can deny the destructive potential of a nuclear bomb as a weapon of mass destruction (WMD). The perception of anthrax as a WMD, however, is yet unformed in our society and its institutions. Opinions on anthrax WMD have ranged from dire to dismissive (1, 2), but a...

www.pnas.org

Public misconceptions exist in the areas of treatment, prevention, detection, and destructiveness with regard to the character of anthrax. First of all, it is not the bacteria, Bacillus anthracis, that poses the greatest risk, but its dry concentrated spores. Inhaled spores, several microns in diameter, reach deep into the lungs, then travel to lymph nodes, replicate in the blood, and produce toxins that cause mortal illness (4). Medical intervention may be successful, but timing is critical. Postexposure oral antibiotic prophylaxis is efficacious if begun during the presymptomatic incubation stage. Combination antibiotics and aggressive hospital supportive care may also succeed in the prodromal stage, but the disease is beyond treatment and inevitably fatal once the fulminant stage is reached (5). Vaccination is believed effective, although complete immunity requires a series of six shots over 18 months, followed by annual booster shots (6).


And, anthrax in an envelope ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it only affects a limited amount of people. In order to weaponize anthrax to make it a WMD, it has to go through a lot of processing to get to the spores.

And...................you might do yourself some good to find out what a WMD actually is..................

Weapon of mass destruction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or any other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to numerous humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g., buildings), natural structures (e.g., mountains), or the biosphere. The scope and usage of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Originally coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives during World War II, it has later come to refer to large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear warfare.


In the very definition, it says it brings harm to numerous humans and great damage to human made structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. Sorry, but an envelope with some anthrax bacteria doesn't qualify. Refine it down to the spores so that it can stay in the air for a long time, and get a successful delivery system to put it in the air, and THEN you have a WMD. Envelopes don't qualify, but keep up with the hysterics if it makes you feel better.

I don’t give a rat‘s ass about your experience nor your nomenclature. Liberal isn’t liberal so I don’t use that term while many others do, do you?
A weapon that results in mass destruction, in my mind, is a weapon of mass destruction.

An envelope with a bit of anthrax in it ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it will generally only affect the person it is mailed to (or the people that open their mail for them), meaning a limited amount of damage, so therefore, it's not a weapon of mass destruction. And, interestingly enough, very few people who received those envelopes got sick, and nobody died as far as I'm aware of.

If it doesn't kill lots of people or do lots of damage, it's not a weapon of mass destruction, no matter what your fevered mind tells you. Sorry, but I was in the military, as well as served on the teams that dealt with WMD's, so I think I understand them a bit better than you do.

Apparently, the reason you don't care about nomenclature is because you don't know what it actually means, so instead of learning and educating yourself, you choose to remain stupid.

And, the reason I call you stupid is because of the following quote........

"Ignorance is when you never had the chance to learn. Stupidity is when you had the chance, but didn't bother. It's quite okay to be ignorant, just don't be stupid."

BTW.
You lied in this thread.
You were just a swabbie cook in a galley while in the Navy.
I've been on this board for a long time.

Please continue with your lying pandemic activities, ABS.

And he never admitted whose navy he was in.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Yep. They attacked the world with a WMD. What does that call for?

It is readily apparent to even the most casual observer that you don't know what a WMD is, or you wouldn't have made such an moronic statement.

Gas, bio, nuke — all WMD.

Naturally occurring viruses that have not been weaponized are not WMD's. But, keep up with the hysteria if that is what helps you sleep at night.

Me? I was a part of the CBR warfare teams when I was in the Navy. It was called CBR (Chemical, Biological, Radiological) back when I was on my first command back in '83.

I also got to serve on the PRP (Personal Reliability Program), where we loaded nukes onto FA-18's. So yeah, I had to learn what WMDs were, how they operated, and what to do if they were used against us. Sorry, but there is nothing that points towards this virus being a WMD except in your own fevered imagination.

Anthrax is naturally occurring and has been weaponized, too. You play in the weeds and I’ll deal with reality.

Do you even know what it takes to weaponize anthrax? You have to get the particles small enough to float in the air as an aerosol for a long time. And no, naturally occurring anthrax isn't automatically weaponized. It has to go through a lot of processing to be used as a weapon.

Like I said, I worked on the teams dealing with WMD's, from biological and chemical, all the way up to nuclear. How many teams were you on?

I lived in the DC area when weaponized anthrax was being sent through the mail.

Educate yourself.

A silent bomb: The risk of anthrax as a weapon of mass destruction

No rational person can deny the destructive potential of a nuclear bomb as a weapon of mass destruction (WMD). The perception of anthrax as a WMD, however, is yet unformed in our society and its institutions. Opinions on anthrax WMD have ranged from dire to dismissive (1, 2), but a...

www.pnas.org

Public misconceptions exist in the areas of treatment, prevention, detection, and destructiveness with regard to the character of anthrax. First of all, it is not the bacteria, Bacillus anthracis, that poses the greatest risk, but its dry concentrated spores. Inhaled spores, several microns in diameter, reach deep into the lungs, then travel to lymph nodes, replicate in the blood, and produce toxins that cause mortal illness (4). Medical intervention may be successful, but timing is critical. Postexposure oral antibiotic prophylaxis is efficacious if begun during the presymptomatic incubation stage. Combination antibiotics and aggressive hospital supportive care may also succeed in the prodromal stage, but the disease is beyond treatment and inevitably fatal once the fulminant stage is reached (5). Vaccination is believed effective, although complete immunity requires a series of six shots over 18 months, followed by annual booster shots (6).


And, anthrax in an envelope ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it only affects a limited amount of people. In order to weaponize anthrax to make it a WMD, it has to go through a lot of processing to get to the spores.

And...................you might do yourself some good to find out what a WMD actually is..................

Weapon of mass destruction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or any other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to numerous humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g., buildings), natural structures (e.g., mountains), or the biosphere. The scope and usage of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Originally coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives during World War II, it has later come to refer to large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear warfare.


In the very definition, it says it brings harm to numerous humans and great damage to human made structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. Sorry, but an envelope with some anthrax bacteria doesn't qualify. Refine it down to the spores so that it can stay in the air for a long time, and get a successful delivery system to put it in the air, and THEN you have a WMD. Envelopes don't qualify, but keep up with the hysterics if it makes you feel better.

I don’t give a rat‘s ass about your experience nor your nomenclature. Liberal isn’t liberal so I don’t use that term while many others do, do you?
A weapon that results in mass destruction, in my mind, is a weapon of mass destruction.

An envelope with a bit of anthrax in it ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it will generally only affect the person it is mailed to (or the people that open their mail for them), meaning a limited amount of damage, so therefore, it's not a weapon of mass destruction. And, interestingly enough, very few people who received those envelopes got sick, and nobody died as far as I'm aware of.

If it doesn't kill lots of people or do lots of damage, it's not a weapon of mass destruction, no matter what your fevered mind tells you. Sorry, but I was in the military, as well as served on the teams that dealt with WMD's, so I think I understand them a bit better than you do.

Apparently, the reason you don't care about nomenclature is because you don't know what it actually means, so instead of learning and educating yourself, you choose to remain stupid.

And, the reason I call you stupid is because of the following quote........

"Ignorance is when you never had the chance to learn. Stupidity is when you had the chance, but didn't bother. It's quite okay to be ignorant, just don't be stupid."

You need to apply your last paragraph to yourself. I was explicit in my take of WMD and it even fit part of your condescending criteria.
Get over yourself.
And, as an American, I will use descriptions I feel are appropriate and allow you to do the same. You take your speech-stifling censorship back to your commie navy. (You didn’t explain what navy you were part of)

Yep. They attacked the world with a WMD. What does that call for?

It is readily apparent to even the most casual observer that you don't know what a WMD is, or you wouldn't have made such an moronic statement.

Gas, bio, nuke — all WMD.

Naturally occurring viruses that have not been weaponized are not WMD's. But, keep up with the hysteria if that is what helps you sleep at night.

Me? I was a part of the CBR warfare teams when I was in the Navy. It was called CBR (Chemical, Biological, Radiological) back when I was on my first command back in '83.

I also got to serve on the PRP (Personal Reliability Program), where we loaded nukes onto FA-18's. So yeah, I had to learn what WMDs were, how they operated, and what to do if they were used against us. Sorry, but there is nothing that points towards this virus being a WMD except in your own fevered imagination.

Anthrax is naturally occurring and has been weaponized, too. You play in the weeds and I’ll deal with reality.

Do you even know what it takes to weaponize anthrax? You have to get the particles small enough to float in the air as an aerosol for a long time. And no, naturally occurring anthrax isn't automatically weaponized. It has to go through a lot of processing to be used as a weapon.

Like I said, I worked on the teams dealing with WMD's, from biological and chemical, all the way up to nuclear. How many teams were you on?

I lived in the DC area when weaponized anthrax was being sent through the mail.

Educate yourself.

A silent bomb: The risk of anthrax as a weapon of mass destruction

No rational person can deny the destructive potential of a nuclear bomb as a weapon of mass destruction (WMD). The perception of anthrax as a WMD, however, is yet unformed in our society and its institutions. Opinions on anthrax WMD have ranged from dire to dismissive (1, 2), but a...

www.pnas.org

Public misconceptions exist in the areas of treatment, prevention, detection, and destructiveness with regard to the character of anthrax. First of all, it is not the bacteria, Bacillus anthracis, that poses the greatest risk, but its dry concentrated spores. Inhaled spores, several microns in diameter, reach deep into the lungs, then travel to lymph nodes, replicate in the blood, and produce toxins that cause mortal illness (4). Medical intervention may be successful, but timing is critical. Postexposure oral antibiotic prophylaxis is efficacious if begun during the presymptomatic incubation stage. Combination antibiotics and aggressive hospital supportive care may also succeed in the prodromal stage, but the disease is beyond treatment and inevitably fatal once the fulminant stage is reached (5). Vaccination is believed effective, although complete immunity requires a series of six shots over 18 months, followed by annual booster shots (6).


And, anthrax in an envelope ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it only affects a limited amount of people. In order to weaponize anthrax to make it a WMD, it has to go through a lot of processing to get to the spores.

And...................you might do yourself some good to find out what a WMD actually is..................

Weapon of mass destruction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or any other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to numerous humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g., buildings), natural structures (e.g., mountains), or the biosphere. The scope and usage of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Originally coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives during World War II, it has later come to refer to large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear warfare.


In the very definition, it says it brings harm to numerous humans and great damage to human made structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. Sorry, but an envelope with some anthrax bacteria doesn't qualify. Refine it down to the spores so that it can stay in the air for a long time, and get a successful delivery system to put it in the air, and THEN you have a WMD. Envelopes don't qualify, but keep up with the hysterics if it makes you feel better.

I don’t give a rat‘s ass about your experience nor your nomenclature. Liberal isn’t liberal so I don’t use that term while many others do, do you?
A weapon that results in mass destruction, in my mind, is a weapon of mass destruction.

An envelope with a bit of anthrax in it ISN'T a weapon of mass destruction, as it will generally only affect the person it is mailed to (or the people that open their mail for them), meaning a limited amount of damage, so therefore, it's not a weapon of mass destruction. And, interestingly enough, very few people who received those envelopes got sick, and nobody died as far as I'm aware of.

If it doesn't kill lots of people or do lots of damage, it's not a weapon of mass destruction, no matter what your fevered mind tells you. Sorry, but I was in the military, as well as served on the teams that dealt with WMD's, so I think I understand them a bit better than you do.

Apparently, the reason you don't care about nomenclature is because you don't know what it actually means, so instead of learning and educating yourself, you choose to remain stupid.

And, the reason I call you stupid is because of the following quote........

"Ignorance is when you never had the chance to learn. Stupidity is when you had the chance, but didn't bother. It's quite okay to be ignorant, just don't be stupid."

BTW.
You lied in this thread.
You were just a swabbie cook in a galley while in the Navy.
I've been on this board for a long time.

Please continue with your lying pandemic activities, ABS.

And he never admitted whose navy he was in.

United States Navy. Joined in '82, went to Orlando boot camp where I was part of C183. First duty station was USS CONCORD (AFS-5), and I retired in 2002. But, keep up with your childish crap if that amuses you. Doesn't bother me much either, because you get to look like an ass, I get to laugh at your bullshit, and neither affects my retirement pay or my benefits.

 

[protectionist]

United States Navy. Joined in '82, went to Orlando boot camp where I was part of C183. First duty station was USS CONCORD (AFS-5), and I retired in 2002. But, keep up with your childish crap if that amuses you. Doesn't bother me much either, because you get to look like an ass, I get to laugh at your bullshit, and neither affects my retirement pay or my benefits.

And those benefits are huge. Anybody can say what they want about our VA, but surgeries I got from them free of charge, have saved my life again and again. And the pension pay is great too.

 

[Mac-7]

Yes, the West should cut them off altogether, but it's doubtful they will hang together due to the lack of spine in the EU.

The ******* French and Germans would sell out. So would that queer bait Trudeau in Canada.

China does skillfully exploit greedy politicians and other leaders and decision makers in western countries

or any country

they are buying influence all over the globe

including within America

 

[harmonica]

PEE ON THEM

 

[g5000]

It's not China's fault Trump blew off the virus and caused the US to be the worst infected country in the universe, with the most deaths by far.

Trump is doing his usual projection of his faults onto others. In fact, he does that so often I am starting to think he was born in Kenya.

Chronology: Trump Was On Top Of Coronavirus While Biden Mocked

No media or Nancy Pelosi false narratives or phony Joe Biden campaign ad can change the truth about the real chronology of the coronavirus.

thefederalist.com

That's a lie you all tell yourselves, but it is another hoax fed to you to repeat like good little parrots.

Chuck Schumer called for the coronavirus to be designated a public health emergency on January 26: SCHUMER REVEALS: CDC CANNOT ACCESS ‘RAPID RESPONSE DOLLARS’ THAT CAN HELP STOP POTENTIALLY DEADLY CORONAVIRUS UNTIL FEDS DECLARE OFFICIAL PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY; SENATOR URGES FEDS TO MAKE THE DECLARATION NOW SO CDC CAN UNLOCK TENS-OF-MILLIONS IN THE PROACTIVE WAR TO BEAT BACK SPREAD | U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York

Joe Biden wrote an op-ed on January 27: Joe Biden: Trump is worst possible leader to deal with coronavirus outbreak

Elizabeth Warren released a plan to contain the virus on January 28: Elizabeth Warren releases plan to prevent and contain infectious diseases amid coronavirus outbreak

And medical experts were calling for immediate action:

Opinion | Act Now to Prevent an American Epidemic

Quarantines, flu vaccines and other steps to take before the Wuhan virus becomes widespread.

www.wsj.com

While Trump was holding rallies calling the cornoavirus concerns "the new Democrat hoax", the Democrats were calling for immediate action. It is precisely because the Democrats were calling for action that Trump called their calls a hoax, retard.

Trump was holding rallies and going golfing while the virus was spreading completely unabated, thanks to his blowing it off as no worse than the flu and a big Democrat hoax.

 

[g5000]

List of Donald Trump rallies (December 2016–2022) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump Golf Count

Trump Golf Count: Tracking President Trumps golfing so you don't have to!

trumpgolfcount.com

Trump was actually too busy using taxpayer dollars to travel around the country holding campaign rallies, and he brought Mike Pence with him.

When Trump wasn't out of town carousing at rallies, he was out of town relaxing on the golf course:

Ladies and gentlemen, your wartime president.

I take no responsibility at all!

 

[g5000]

It turns out that even during a PANDEMIC, Trump is not too busy to go golf.

“I’m going to be working for you. I’m not going to have time to go play golf. Bleev me...Bleev me...Bleev me, folks." - Donald Trump, August 8, 2016

 

[protectionist]

It's not China's fault Trump blew off the virus and caused the US to be the worst infected country in the universe, with the most deaths by far.

Trump is doing his usual projection of his faults onto others. In fact, he does that so often I am starting to think he was born in Kenya.

Chronology: Trump Was On Top Of Coronavirus While Biden Mocked

No media or Nancy Pelosi false narratives or phony Joe Biden campaign ad can change the truth about the real chronology of the coronavirus.

thefederalist.com

That's a lie you all tell yourselves, but it is another hoax fed to you to repeat like good little parrots.

Chuck Schumer called for the coronavirus to be designated a public health emergency on January 26: SCHUMER REVEALS: CDC CANNOT ACCESS ‘RAPID RESPONSE DOLLARS’ THAT CAN HELP STOP POTENTIALLY DEADLY CORONAVIRUS UNTIL FEDS DECLARE OFFICIAL PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY; SENATOR URGES FEDS TO MAKE THE DECLARATION NOW SO CDC CAN UNLOCK TENS-OF-MILLIONS IN THE PROACTIVE WAR TO BEAT BACK SPREAD | U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York

Joe Biden wrote an op-ed on January 27: Joe Biden: Trump is worst possible leader to deal with coronavirus outbreak

Elizabeth Warren released a plan to contain the virus on January 28: Elizabeth Warren releases plan to prevent and contain infectious diseases amid coronavirus outbreak

And medical experts were calling for immediate action:

Opinion | Act Now to Prevent an American Epidemic

Quarantines, flu vaccines and other steps to take before the Wuhan virus becomes widespread.

www.wsj.com

While Trump was holding rallies calling the cornoavirus concerns "the new Democrat hoax", the Democrats were calling for immediate action. It is precisely because the Democrats were calling for action that Trump called their calls a hoax, retard.

Trump was holding rallies and going golfing while the virus was spreading completely unabated, thanks to his blowing it off as no worse than the flu and a big Democrat hoax.

WHAT is a lie ? Be specific., retard. And your summation is backwards. Another hoax fed to you by fake news liberal media,

As early as January, Trump blocked travel from China, well before the Europeans did. He also sent 2 big Navy hospital ships to New York, authorized the stimulus checks, started the Task Force, and in January got the NIH working on a vaccine.

And back in early February, the CDC began shipping CDC-Developed test kits to U.S. and international labs.

As for Schumer, he was late. 2 days earlier, Trump administration officials held a briefing to instruct members of the Senate about the virus (the only reason Schumer knew about it), and 4 days earlier on January 22, one day before the Chinese government began a quarantine of Wuhan to contain the spread of the virus, Arkansas Republican senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar, encouraging the Trump administration to consider banning travel between China and the United States and warning that the Communist regime could be covering up how dangerous the disease really was.

That same day, he amplified his warnings on Twitter and in an appearance on the radio program of Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade.

Tom Cotton was both the first and the loudest voice in Congress to sound the alarm about the looming pandemic.
While others slept, Tom Cotton was warning anyone who would listen that the coronavirus was coming for America.

At the time, the Senate impeachment trial was dominating the news cycle. The trial, which lasted from January 16 to February 5, had even blotted out coverage of the Democratic presidential primary, When the first classified briefing on the virus was held in the Senate on January 24, only 14 senators reportedly showed up.

Cotton’s public and private warnings became more urgent that last week of January. In a January 28 letter to the secretaries of state, health and human services, and homeland security, he noted that “no amount of screening [at airports] will identify a contagious-but-asymptomatic person afflicted with the coronavirus” and called for an immediate evacuation of Americans in China and a ban on all commercial flights between China and the United States. Trump then agreed, and issued the ban. And the moronic response from liberals and Democrats (which they since have backpedaled from) ? They called it "racist".

Good thing Trump is president, and not that serial killer woman.

Folks, be alert for Information-deprived liberals, victims of liberal OMISSION media.