How much trouble is Hillary Clinton Really in?

[Markle]

How much trouble is Hillary Clinton REALLY IN?

The Inspector General Report is DEVASTATING, make no mistake. Don't let Progressives try to spin this any other way. They are peeing in their pants. Next comes the FBI criminal investigation.

See it all here:
How much trouble is Hillary Clinton really in?

 

[Lewdog]

How much trouble is Hillary Clinton REALLY IN?

See it all here:
How much trouble is Hillary Clinton really in?

Yeah your link is busted.

 

[ScienceRocks]

It's time for HIliary to ask her super delegates to endorse sanders, endorse him her self and drop out. Sorry, but she can't beat donald and is about ready to run against legal problems that will destroy her in the general.

 

[Billy000]

How much trouble is Hillary Clinton REALLY IN?

The Inspector General Report is DEVASTATING, make no mistake. Don't let Progressives try to spin this any other way. They are peeing in their pants. Next comes the FBI criminal investigation.

See it all here:
How much trouble is Hillary Clinton really in?

Oh great Fox News. If Fox says Hillary's in trouble I guess I better believe it! Who cares if they are the source for republican dick sucking politics? They made a video. It must be the truth.

God you people are such pons.

 

[TheOldSchool]

How much trouble is Hillary Clinton REALLY IN?

The Inspector General Report is DEVASTATING, make no mistake. Don't let Progressives try to spin this any other way. They are peeing in their pants. Next comes the FBI criminal investigation.

See it all here:
How much trouble is Hillary Clinton really in?

Lol "devastating"

 

[CowboyTed]

It's time for HIliary to ask her super delegates to endorse sanders, endorse him her self and drop out. Sorry, but she can't beat donald and is about ready to run against legal problems that will destroy her in the general.

Matthew,

The Email thing is close to done... There will be no charges, not criminal....

If Trump wants to raise transparency, hey where are your tax records...

 

[Clementine]

She should be in serious trouble. Most of the media is treating this like a minor little mistake while it's clear that it's far more serious.

It wasn't a mistake, as Hillary tried to claim. She deliberately went ahead and set up a private server after asking for a private account and being told that she couldn't due to security concerns. That should have been the end of it.

She was also warned numerous times that it was a huge security risk. Again, she did nothing.

There were several attempts to hack her server by an unknown person.

She also failed to turn over all emails pertaining to her job when she left.

It seems that Hillary thinks rules are for other people but not her. Arrogant doesn't begin to describe her attitude.

If this had been a Republican who flouted the law and put the country at risk, they would have been tarred and feathered. Being it's a liberal, the media is circling the wagons and Obama and the Dems are acting like her dishonesty and total disregard for safety of the info were just minor slip ups. It was sheer luck that she wasn't hacked. And I don't even know if they are sure about that.

"The FBI has been investigating since last August how classified information made it onto Clinton’s unclassified private server. The investigation is in its final stages and there is no indication criminal charges against anyone are likely, or that classified information was compromised or that the system was actually breached. Clinton’s senior aides have been interviewed by the FBI, and the former Secretary is expected to be interviewed soon.

Clinton’s critics have accused her of endangering national security and intentionally thwarting rules and laws enforcing government transparency. In a statement, her campaign said that "there is no evidence of any successful breach of the Secretary’s server" and that "Clinton’s use of personal email was not unique, and she took steps that went much further than others to appropriately preserve and release her records."

The Federal Records Act requires government officials to comply with rules that they hand over all their work e-mails to their employers when they leave government. Clinton only turned over more than 30,000 pages of work e-mails to the State Department 21 months after she stepped down in 2013.

The State IG report says Clinton responded in person to a top department security official in 2009 after he sent a classified memo to her chief of staff describing the vulnerability of Blackberry devices to hackers. The report also says Clinton received a March 11, 2011 email from the State cyber security team warrning of a "dramatic increase since January 2011 in attempts by [redacted] cyber actors to compromise the private home e-mail accounts of senior Department officials."

Multiple organizations are suing the State Department for access to Clinton’s e-mails, and some claim she intentionally thwarted the Freedom of Information Act in keeping all her work e-mails on her private server. One group, Judicial Watch, has asked a federal judge to subpoena all of Clinton’s e-mails to ensure she isn’t hiding anything. The judge in that case has said he may subpoena all her documents, potentially including any recovered personal e-mails which Clinton sent and received on the system.

Preventing those personal e-mails from becoming public appears to have been a contributing factor in why Clinton set up the private server to begin with, according to one e-mail exchange made public by the State IG report. In November 2010, the report says, Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff emailed her that "we should talk about putting you on state email or releasing your email address to the department." Clinton responded, "Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.""

http://time.com/4348021/hillary-clinton-emails-ig-report/

 

[kaz]

How much trouble is Hillary Clinton REALLY IN?

The Inspector General Report is DEVASTATING, make no mistake. Don't let Progressives try to spin this any other way. They are peeing in their pants. Next comes the FBI criminal investigation.

See it all here:
How much trouble is Hillary Clinton really in?

Oh great Fox News. If Fox says Hillary's in trouble I guess I better believe it! Who cares if they are the source for republican dick sucking politics? They made a video. It must be the truth.

God you people are such pons.

You still pine for the days when all the media was leftist. Sorry, my friend, those days are not coming back

 

[IsaacNewton]

Since the TSA started many security breeches have occured. Real ones. And yet no big investigation because they aren't the Republicans opponent in elections so they see no need to use the offices of government and taxpayer money to investigate with any rigor.

Hillary Clinton simply did what every SOS did before her and none of them were investigated and none charged with anything.

You poor cons have hung all your hopes on this fantasy hail mary which has been nothing all along, just like Ben Gassy. And even if she can't continue as candidate for president Bernie Sanders will mop the floor with Trump. Sorry cons, reality has been staring you in the face for a year, you already lost.

 

[candycorn]

How much trouble is Hillary Clinton REALLY IN?

The Inspector General Report is DEVASTATING, make no mistake. Don't let Progressives try to spin this any other way. They are peeing in their pants. Next comes the FBI criminal investigation.

See it all here:
How much trouble is Hillary Clinton really in?

None.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

How much trouble is Hillary Clinton REALLY IN?

The Inspector General Report is DEVASTATING, make no mistake. Don't let Progressives try to spin this any other way. They are peeing in their pants. Next comes the FBI criminal investigation.

See it all here:
How much trouble is Hillary Clinton really in?

Oh great Fox News. If Fox says Hillary's in trouble I guess I better believe it! Who cares if they are the source for republican dick sucking politics? They made a video. It must be the truth.

God you people are such pons.

This tells you that the progressives, like Hillary, will dance and make any excuse they can find to try and recuse Mrs Clinton from any responsibility to take national security seriously. Anyone with even the most basic common intelligence knows you simply can't set up one email account (personal or not) to be able to handle ALL your correspondence with the federal state department and think your own personal server is adequate enough to encrypt and secure all your government sentitive conversations. Perhaps Mrs Clinton is simply not up to date with all her knowledge of computers and the Internet to be able to handle all our nation's electronic advancements in her pursuit of the job of the presidency?

 

[tyroneweaver]

Funny under democrats this type of behavior is called breaking the rules.
If a republican did this they would call it breaking the law

 

[IsaacNewton]

Funny under democrats this type of behavior is called breaking the rules.
If a republican did this they would call it breaking the law

Funnier still how Republicans whine about people making more than $7.50 an hour but they have no problem at all spending 40 million dollars of taxpayer money on politically motivated investigations that result in nothing.

Bush allows 3,000 Americans to die on 9/11 and get's a pass, Hillary Clinton who wasn't president or in charge of anything regarding national security or the military happens to be Secretary of State when radicals attack one of our embassies and four people die and conservatives believe it the crime of all time.

Cons you really need to stop lying to yourselves. The rest of us see these lies as exactly what they are. You see them as things to be ignored because it's 'bad for you team'. You could not care less about lives or national security.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Funny under democrats this type of behavior is called breaking the rules.
If a republican did this they would call it breaking the law

Funnier still how Republicans whine about people making more than $7.50 an hour but they have no problem at all spending 40 million dollars of taxpayer money on politically motivated investigations that result in nothing.

Bush allows 3,000 Americans to die on 9/11 and get's a pass, Hillary Clinton who wasn't president or in charge of anything regarding national security or the military happens to be Secretary of State when radicals attack one of our embassies and four people die and conservatives believe it the crime of all time.

Cons you really need to stop lying to yourselves. The rest of us see these lies as exactly what they are. You see them as things to be ignored because it's 'bad for you team'. You could not care less about lives or national security.

And you got all this out of my comment....amazing.
I'm sure glad Isaac Newton is going to heaven so he can pull the rest of us poor slobs in.

 

[easyt65]

As long as Obama is President Hillary is 'safe'.

 

[kaz]

Since the TSA started many security breeches have occured. Real ones. And yet no big investigation because they aren't the Republicans opponent in elections so they see no need to use the offices of government and taxpayer money to investigate with any rigor.

Hillary Clinton simply did what every SOS did before her and none of them were investigated and none charged with anything.

You poor cons have hung all your hopes on this fantasy hail mary which has been nothing all along, just like Ben Gassy. And even if she can't continue as candidate for president Bernie Sanders will mop the floor with Trump. Sorry cons, reality has been staring you in the face for a year, you already lost.

Yellowcake

 

[rightwinger]

Outside of Fox nation she is in no trouble at all

Overblown right wing scandals cannot be prosecuted

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Funny under democrats this type of behavior is called breaking the rules.
If a republican did this they would call it breaking the law

Funnier still how Republicans whine about people making more than $7.50 an hour but they have no problem at all spending 40 million dollars of taxpayer money on politically motivated investigations that result in nothing.

Bush allows 3,000 Americans to die on 9/11 and get's a pass, Hillary Clinton who wasn't president or in charge of anything regarding national security or the military happens to be Secretary of State when radicals attack one of our embassies and four people die and conservatives believe it the crime of all time.

Cons you really need to stop lying to yourselves. The rest of us see these lies as exactly what they are. You see them as things to be ignored because it's 'bad for you team'. You could not care less about lives or national security.

The Inspector General who released the report of his findings was selected by the Obama administration and approved by Denocrats, this is not coming from a republican committee or investigation like Benghazt.

It's interesting when asked to move from her own personal server with very little encryption or security protective measures to a government one, and she is more concerned about her own personal emails being uncovered, than any government breech of national security that could result from not moving to a more secured server.

As usual the Clinton's try to bend the rules to serve what conveniences them more than what is required. Now the Clinton's believe they have enough political power that they can simply make themselves the "exception" to the rules. She got caught, and now needs to take full responsibility of the consequences that can result from a "Clinton attitude" that doesn't take government standards and policies seriously and worthy of recognition.

 

[Rozman]

Outside of Fox nation she is in no trouble at all

Overblown right wing scandals cannot be prosecuted

I had no idea the FBI worked for the GOP and followed their directive....
As usual the Clintonites come to their leader's defense.

 

[bendog]

She's toast. Young women don't like her. Possibly Warren can save her tired old crooked azz, but Mass has a gop governor.