How Franklin Roosevelt Made Memorial Day Necessary

[PoliticalChic]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

 

[irosie91]

sheeeesh----he did the best he could-----his uncontrolled hypertention was MEAGERLY treated with phenobarbital (which really does not do the job---probably made him drowsy.....

 

[guno]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

the remembrance of our war dead,

our? you have no connection to the history of this country you said yourself you were an adopted asian baby, you have NO connetion to the history of America, so it isn't OUR history

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


In order to shield Franklin Roosevelt from the well deserved contumely due to being a pawn of the Soviet Communists, this 'monolithic Nazi nation' lie had to be advanced: 'There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler, which the very existence of a significant anti-Nazi German resistance movement belied.'



a. "While the Nazi Party tried to give the appearance that it was highly popular party and regime from 1933, this was not the case as the last ever ‘democratic’ election in March 1933 illustrated. After all, if the Nazi Party and Hitler were universally popular within Germany, why the need for concentration camps, arbitrary arrests, control of the media and education? Hitler had never been universally popular among the army’s officer corps nor among the aristocratic families of Germany. The Kreisau Circle came within both of these groups."
Kreisau Circle - History Learning Site



b. "The Kreisau Circle (German: Kreisauer Kreis) was the name the Nazi Gestapo gave to a group of German dissidents centered on the estate of Helmuth James Graf von Moltke at Kreisau, Silesia (now Krzyżowa, Poland). It is regarded as one of the main centers of German opposition to the Nazi regime."
Kreisau Circle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaKreisau_Circle
Wikipedia




'Til this day, in order to be a good Liberal, one must believe both lies, and worship at the alter of Franklin Roosevelt.

Put another way.....under what thought process could contact with these anti-Nazi Germans be found lacking?????

 

[irosie91]

Monday morning quarter backing

 

[irosie91]

the most basic question re OBAMA-------who told him to appoint
hillary hell on wheels and kerry the klown

 

[gipper]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

Absolutely true. Thanks PC for once again exposing the traitorous acts of Stalin's Stooge.

Not only did he waste numerous American lives, but also the lives of many other nationalities, including 100s of thousands of Germans and Japanese.

It is sickening that this disgusting piece of trash is considered by many uninformed Americans, a great president.

 

[irosie91]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

Absolutely true. Thanks PC for once again exposing the traitorous acts of Stalin's Stooge.

Not only did he waste numerous American lives, but also the lives of many other nationalities, including 100s of thousands of Germans and Japanese.

It is sickening that this disgusting piece of trash is considered by many uninformed Americans, a great president.

he was a great president------just not perfect and allah was not telling him
what sort of guy stalin was

 

[gipper]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

Absolutely true. Thanks PC for once again exposing the traitorous acts of Stalin's Stooge.

Not only did he waste numerous American lives, but also the lives of many other nationalities, including 100s of thousands of Germans and Japanese.

It is sickening that this disgusting piece of trash is considered by many uninformed Americans, a great president.

he was a great president------just not perfect and allah was not telling him
what sort of guy stalin was

Yeah...he wasn't perfect. Too funny. A man responsible for so much death and suffering wasn't perfect. No shit!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Monday morning quarter backing

And you...a closed mind.

Clearly, you can't point to anything in my posts that is inaccurate.

Consider this: you may be ignorant of the facts.

 

[irosie91]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

Absolutely true. Thanks PC for once again exposing the traitorous acts of Stalin's Stooge.

Not only did he waste numerous American lives, but also the lives of many other nationalities, including 100s of thousands of Germans and Japanese.

It is sickening that this disgusting piece of trash is considered by many uninformed Americans, a great president.

he was a great president------just not perfect and allah was not telling him
what sort of guy stalin was

Yeah...he wasn't perfect. Too funny. A man responsible for so much death and suffering wasn't perfect. No shit!

He was not responsible for the death and destruction----he was facing a
very untenable situation and did as good a job at it as could be expected---
same is true of George Wasshington

 

[TheOldSchool]

Monday morning quarter backing

And you...a closed mind.

Clearly, you can't point to anything in my posts that is inaccurate.

Consider this: you may be ignorant of the facts.

Usually when a crazy person posts something insane and innaccurate, it's impossible to convince them they've posted something insane and innaccurate because they are crazy.

 

[irosie91]

Monday morning quarter backing

And you...a closed mind.

Clearly, you can't point to anything in my posts that is inaccurate.

Consider this: you may be ignorant of the facts.

----judgement of quality issue is-------a matter of OPINION----- Roosevelt should
have known not to cooperate in any way with Stalin------is a MATTER OF OPINION
based on information that Roosevelt might not have had

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

Absolutely true. Thanks PC for once again exposing the traitorous acts of Stalin's Stooge.

Not only did he waste numerous American lives, but also the lives of many other nationalities, including 100s of thousands of Germans and Japanese.

It is sickening that this disgusting piece of trash is considered by many uninformed Americans, a great president.

he was a great president------just not perfect and allah was not telling him
what sort of guy stalin was

Your education continues:

5. Why did Stalin demand the policy of "Unconditional Surrender"?

Stalin was afraid that his erstwhile ally, Germany, would stand in his way of European, and then global, domination after the war.
Therefore, he needed Germany 'pulverized,' 'pastoralized,' 'de-industrialized'....hence he directed his agents in Washington to advance 'unconditional surrender.'


A possibility that the Allies would accept the peace overtures from anti-Nazi, anti-communist Germans was anathema to Stalin!


Franz von Papen, ... German statesman and diplomat, and non-Nazi, attempted to open talks with the Allies via the Vatican. Von Papen had done so by February 1943.

In the Kremlin the thought that Papen was aiming at a separate peace with the America and Britain, and that the Vatican might play a role in bringing about an end to the hostilities in the West, could not be allowed!.




Lieutenant General Pavel Anatolyevich Sudoplatov .... was a member of the intelligence services of the Soviet Union who rose to the rank of lieutenant general.
Pavel Sudoplatov - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In his 1994 memoir, Sudoplatov gave the Kremlin's analysis as: "Such an accord [a treaty with the Allies] would limit Communist influence in Europe....Stalin was so furious he ordered von Papen be assassinated, since he was the key figure around whom the Americans and the British would build an alternative government to Hitler if they signed a separate peace." "Special Tasks: The Memoirs of an Unwanted Witness - A Soviet Spymaster,"
by Pavel Sudoplatov Anatoli Sudoplatov (Author), & 3 more, p. 115-116





"Such an accord would limit Communist influence in Europe."

Neither Stalin nor Roosevelt would allow that!

 

[gipper]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

Absolutely true. Thanks PC for once again exposing the traitorous acts of Stalin's Stooge.

Not only did he waste numerous American lives, but also the lives of many other nationalities, including 100s of thousands of Germans and Japanese.

It is sickening that this disgusting piece of trash is considered by many uninformed Americans, a great president.

he was a great president------just not perfect and allah was not telling him
what sort of guy stalin was

Yeah...he wasn't perfect. Too funny. A man responsible for so much death and suffering wasn't perfect. No shit!

He was not responsible for the death and destruction----he was facing a
very untenable situation and did as good a job at it as could be expected---
same is true of George Wasshington

Total BS and a very lame justification.

FDR was the worst of the worst. When will Americans realize that ALL politicians are scum?...those like FDR, are lower than scum.

 

[irosie91]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

Absolutely true. Thanks PC for once again exposing the traitorous acts of Stalin's Stooge.

Not only did he waste numerous American lives, but also the lives of many other nationalities, including 100s of thousands of Germans and Japanese.

It is sickening that this disgusting piece of trash is considered by many uninformed Americans, a great president.

he was a great president------just not perfect and allah was not telling him
what sort of guy stalin was

Your education continues:

5. Why did Stalin demand the policy of "Unconditional Surrender"?

Stalin was afraid that his erstwhile ally, Germany, would stand in his way of European, and then global, domination after the war.
Therefore, he needed Germany 'pulverized,' 'pastoralized,' 'de-industrialized'....hence he directed his agents in Washington to advance 'unconditional surrender.'


A possibility that the Allies would accept the peace overtures from anti-Nazi, anti-communist Germans was anathema to Stalin!


Franz von Papen, ... German statesman and diplomat, and non-Nazi, attempted to open talks with the Allies via the Vatican. Von Papen had done so by February 1943.

In the Kremlin the thought that Papen was aiming at a separate peace with the America and Britain, and that the Vatican might play a role in bringing about an end to the hostilities in the West, could not be allowed!.




Lieutenant General Pavel Anatolyevich Sudoplatov .... was a member of the intelligence services of the Soviet Union who rose to the rank of lieutenant general.
Pavel Sudoplatov - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In his 1994 memoir, Sudoplatov gave the Kremlin's analysis as: "Such an accord [a treaty with the Allies] would limit Communist influence in Europe....Stalin was so furious he ordered von Papen be assassinated, since he was the key figure around whom the Americans and the British would build an alternative government to Hitler if they signed a separate peace." "Special Tasks: The Memoirs of an Unwanted Witness - A Soviet Spymaster,"
by Pavel Sudoplatov Anatoli Sudoplatov (Author), & 3 more, p. 115-116





"Such an accord would limit Communist influence in Europe."

Neither Stalin nor Roosevelt would allow that!

Monday morning quarter backing again-------in fact STALIN DID NOT
INVENT "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER" ----it is classical-------greek,
roman and even biblical

 

[gipper]

Monday morning quarter backing

And you...a closed mind.

Clearly, you can't point to anything in my posts that is inaccurate.

Consider this: you may be ignorant of the facts.

----judgement of quality issue is-------a matter of OPINION----- Roosevelt should
have known not to cooperate in any way with Stalin------is a MATTER OF OPINION
based on information that Roosevelt might not have had

He did much more than 'cooperate' with Stalin.

Have you considered for one minute FDR's involvement with Poland in starting the war in 1939? The stupid Anglos and Franks go to war over Poland, only to end the war by giving not only Poland to the world's worst tyrant, but half of Europe. This is somehow considered a great job...by statists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Monday morning quarter backing

And you...a closed mind.

Clearly, you can't point to anything in my posts that is inaccurate.

Consider this: you may be ignorant of the facts.

Usually when a crazy person posts something insane and innaccurate, it's impossible to convince them they've posted something insane and innaccurate because they are crazy.

"....it's impossible to convince them they've posted something insane and innaccurate (sic)..."


Let me peruse your post, and consider the specifics that you have been able to point out as inaccurate.....
Hmmmmm.......


There are none.

So....your post is simply one more in a long line of FDR groupies posting "is not, isssss nooooottttttt!!!!"


I sure wish some of you dolts had an education.




Go ahead.....see if you can rebut any of the material I've provided.....especially these:

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.

2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.

 

[Dot Com]

1. Today, MEMORIAL DAY, the remembrance of our war dead, is an appropriate time to peruse the extent to which a Commander-in-Chief should be concerned with saving American lives.
Should he make strategy decisions predicated on efficient use of our armed forces, and the mitigating our losses?


Franklin Roosevelt shrugged off this responsibility.


Rather than simply defeating the enemy, and limiting our losses....he followed the demands of a homicidal maniac, and cost the lives of some 200,000 sons, fathers, brothers who need not have died.
That's correct: Allowing Stalin to dictate American war policy cost the lives of thousands of Americans.
Today's thread will prove this....it will irrefutably substantiate this claim; in it you will find facts not taught in government school.




The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.


2. Finis: The Lie of an Unwavering, Monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” Reagan



The motivation for this thread can be found in the constant wailing of the Roosevelt groupies.....such as this one:
"A coup against Hitler was wishful thinking. [Head of German Military Intelligence Wilhelm] Canaris nor anyone else was in a position to overthrow Hitler and any idea he or anyone else could have is based on faulty speculation. "
What If....Roosevelt Was Pro-America?


False.




3. The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."


The consequences of cementing this falsehood in the minds of dupes, include;

a. A validation for the demand for 'unconditional surreenter,' and nothing less.

b. Extending the war by several years

c. Some 200,000 unnecessary American servicemen killed or wounded.

d. Red Army control of half of Europe.



But....were the Germans actually foursquare behind Hitler and the Nazis?

Because....if they weren't......'Unconditional Surrender" was a flawed policy.

And thousands of American lives were wasted.



Let's find out.

the remembrance of our war dead,

our? you have no connection to the history of this country you said yourself you were an adopted asian baby, you have NO connetion to the history of America, so it isn't OUR history

^ that

she better hope Trump doesnt win

 

[PoliticalChic]

Monday morning quarter backing

And you...a closed mind.

Clearly, you can't point to anything in my posts that is inaccurate.

Consider this: you may be ignorant of the facts.

----judgement of quality issue is-------a matter of OPINION----- Roosevelt should
have known not to cooperate in any way with Stalin------is a MATTER OF OPINION
based on information that Roosevelt might not have had

....see if you can rebut any of the material I've provided.....especially these:

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.

2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.