How Far Will Democrats and News Media Go to Steal an Election?

Sorry you'll have to produce actual evidence rather than conspiracy theory dribble. What proof is there of 'collusion' AND what measurable effect has it had if it is real. What evidence is there of George Soros owning voting machines and that these machines have been tampered with and are changing votes.

Not doing their job to inform the electorate? They've given Escroto Trump a GIGANTIC amount of free air time compared to anyone else in history. If HE can't get his message out with the unprecedented amount of free air time he's had then he has no message.

The Alex Jones conspiracy wheel of fortune is a laughable figment of the imagination of the basket of D'escrotobles.
It has already been established that debate questions were furnished to Hillary's campaign prior to some of the debates.

Normally that would be called cheating...

A rumor going around about this yes. Let's say it is true, what measurable difference has it had on anything.
Virtually none. Democrats and republicans have shown that they do not care about anything including lying, cheating, illegal acts of outright insanity. They are going to vote for the one that has the right letter next to their name no matter what.

The real question is not how this is going to affect the election as much as WHY you do not seem to give a shit that she outright cheated with the collusion of the media. That puts the political corruption that we have throughout out 'representatives' front and center and no one gives a damn.

You can't provide evidence or what measurable difference any of this 'perceived' collusion has made.
I haven't bothered because it is irrelevant. You are still trying to deny known facts. How is a discussion about the effects of overt cheating and collusion supposed to move forward when you are still trying to deny the sky is blue.

Conspiracy theories don't qualify as fact. If you have an answer to evidence and what measurable difference any of this 'perceived' collusion made present it.
 
It has already been established that debate questions were furnished to Hillary's campaign prior to some of the debates.

Normally that would be called cheating...

A rumor going around about this yes. Let's say it is true, what measurable difference has it had on anything.
Virtually none. Democrats and republicans have shown that they do not care about anything including lying, cheating, illegal acts of outright insanity. They are going to vote for the one that has the right letter next to their name no matter what.

The real question is not how this is going to affect the election as much as WHY you do not seem to give a shit that she outright cheated with the collusion of the media. That puts the political corruption that we have throughout out 'representatives' front and center and no one gives a damn.

You can't provide evidence or what measurable difference any of this 'perceived' collusion has made.
I haven't bothered because it is irrelevant. You are still trying to deny known facts. How is a discussion about the effects of overt cheating and collusion supposed to move forward when you are still trying to deny the sky is blue.

Conspiracy theories don't qualify as fact. If you have an answer to evidence and what measurable difference any of this 'perceived' collusion made present it.
It is not a conspiracy theory. It has been established.

Again, here you are demanding that the sky is not actually blue.
 

Forum List

Back
Top