This just in....
but we are told that year after year, man keeps increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature is going up and in 11 and 1/2 years now, we are all doomed. So if the temperature keeps going up year after year, how can you have "HISTORIC" blizzard....Liberals are and always will be the most stupid people on the planet.
It is the same reason why "cancer" will never have a cure.. Too much money is given for the research, the scientists dont want to kill the golden goose.
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now.
The first bullet point is fine.
The second bullet point, change the word pollution to dioxide.
The third bullet point, not even close.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Republican climate rhetoric shifts (again), but the goal remains the same.
In recent years, leaders of the Republican Party have become aware that denying the existence of global warming makes them look like idiots. Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people — they can be directly measured, with such exotic instruments as a “thermometer.” Majorities of every group except the most conservative Republicans (who will trust their media over their lying eyes) believe it is happening.
Denying visible, tangible reality is a dicey business, even for the modern US right. It makes the party look like a death cult. So Republican climate-communication strategy has undergone something of an adjustment.
Not a large adjustment, mind you. The GOP remains dead set against doing anything about climate change, against any policy that would threaten the profits of fossil fuel companies. That is the non-negotiable baseline, despite a few fringe figures who signal otherwise (until the time comes for votes).
But front-line, hardcore denialism of the “it’s a hoax” variety has largely receded to the base. Republican leaders and spokespeople have moved back to the next line of defense: Yes, the climate is changing, but we don’t know to what extent humans are responsible.
Professional double-talker Marco Rubio, senator from the climate-battered state of Florida, ran a version of this on CNN’s Jake Tapper show earlier this month.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people
Do you have a 100 year period in history when "the climate did not change"?
How about a 20 year period?
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now. In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
I'm not going to argue with you. I'm just putting you down as a denier. Not even a good one. Republicans have gotten good at denying GW without actually denying it. They say we are contributing but now the question is, how much.
For 10 years they said we weren't contributing, now we are but the question how much.
This reminds me of the Corporations and Republicans who denied cigarettes caused cancer or that lead was bad for us.
You simply suck.
Excellent point!
What were the changes over this most recent 50 year period?
What about the 50 year period before that?
What about the eighteen 50 year periods before that?
Before we waste...err...invest trillions in windmills, we need to know more.
In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
Thank goodness. A bit of warming is much better than an ice age.
An ice age would kill billions.
I'm not going to argue with you.
That's good. I wouldn't want to make you cry.
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now.
The first bullet point is fine.
The second bullet point, change the word pollution to dioxide.
The third bullet point, not even close.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Republican climate rhetoric shifts (again), but the goal remains the same.
In recent years, leaders of the Republican Party have become aware that denying the existence of global warming makes them look like idiots. Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people — they can be directly measured, with such exotic instruments as a “thermometer.” Majorities of every group except the most conservative Republicans (who will trust their media over their lying eyes) believe it is happening.
Denying visible, tangible reality is a dicey business, even for the modern US right. It makes the party look like a death cult. So Republican climate-communication strategy has undergone something of an adjustment.
Not a large adjustment, mind you. The GOP remains dead set against doing anything about climate change, against any policy that would threaten the profits of fossil fuel companies. That is the non-negotiable baseline, despite a few fringe figures who signal otherwise (until the time comes for votes).
But front-line, hardcore denialism of the “it’s a hoax” variety has largely receded to the base. Republican leaders and spokespeople have moved back to the next line of defense: Yes, the climate is changing, but we don’t know to what extent humans are responsible.
Professional double-talker Marco Rubio, senator from the climate-battered state of Florida, ran a version of this on CNN’s Jake Tapper show earlier this month.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people
Do you have a 100 year period in history when "the climate did not change"?
How about a 20 year period?
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now. In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
I'm not going to argue with you. I'm just putting you down as a denier. Not even a good one. Republicans have gotten good at denying GW without actually denying it. They say we are contributing but now the question is, how much.
For 10 years they said we weren't contributing, now we are but the question how much.
This reminds me of the Corporations and Republicans who denied cigarettes caused cancer or that lead was bad for us.
You simply suck.
Excellent point!
What were the changes over this most recent 50 year period?
What about the 50 year period before that?
What about the eighteen 50 year periods before that?
Before we waste...err...invest trillions in windmills, we need to know more.
In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
Thank goodness. A bit of warming is much better than an ice age.
An ice age would kill billions.
I'm not going to argue with you.
That's good. I wouldn't want to make you cry.
Here are 197 bad arguments global warming deniers make and the scientific response to the stupid shit you say
https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Your bad arguments on on this list so stop making flawed arguments. Seriously.
That is an odd switch for the Trump administration.
No, you didn't think.
Do you think these two did think?
Is that the best you can do? I'm sure they think a lot. But not with any logic or wisdom.
I'm doing fine. You're the one chirping emotional posts.
