How did Comey Leak?

[Uncensored2008]

Sure, Comey took private classified documents and gave them to a friend in hopes of damaging the President of the United States, his boss. in violation of federal law.

Hey, nitwit.....Comey SPECIFICALLY stated that what he gave to his friend was UN-classified memoranda.

Comey testified that he leaked his notes of private meetings with the President of the United States in his capacity as Director of the FBI to the New York Times. Trump has requested the AG Sessions prosecute Comey. I see bad times ahead for the little DNC lapdog.

 

[paperview]

The memo was not classified.

Didn't you hear the testimony?

What memo?

Comey leaked notes the FBI director took while in a private meeting with the president, very much classified intel.

No. Not classified. Nutbag.

 

[eddiew]

[

No, but I can say repugs are traitorous scum. Can you? You have already proven it. Follow the yellow brick road

I could, but I'm not a Nazi like you, so I don't lie.

Does the yellow brick road lead to Salem, home of witch hunts like the one you Nazis are conducting?

This is no witch hunt It's a hunt for those who f-ed with our election and dolts like you want it to all go away never mind that trump and his band of crooks are running scared We'll find out when trump takes the oath
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and releases his tax returns lol lol Oh yeah ,then we have those tapes that will never see light of day

 

[eddiew]

why would trump go way overboard on protecting Flynn unless he knows flynn can bury him his son in law and others?

 

[Care4all]

He has the power to declassify, if they are.

Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president.
Politifact

are the tapes Trump says hes releasing classified ?

Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....

They are authorized to declassify anything their own departments created and classified.

Utterly false

Now you're just making shit up.

No it is NOT false. If you had paid attention during the Hillary server investigation, You would know that....there were several things the state dept felt should be declassified, and the department, with the Director of the department, was the only person who could declassify the documents ahead of their scheduled time...the secretaries of the department or the Director of the Agency could classify or declassify, what they felt appropriate, at any time, if THEY were the department or agency who did the initial classified marking.

 

[Uncensored2008]

He has the power to declassify, if they are.

Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president.
Politifact

are the tapes Trump says hes releasing classified ?

Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....

They are authorized to declassify anything their own departments created and classified.

Utterly false

Now you're just making shit up.

No it is NOT false. If you had paid attention during the Hillary server investigation, You would know that....there were several things the state dept felt should be declassified, and the department, with the Director of the department, was the only person who could declassify the documents ahead of their scheduled time...the secretaries of the department or the Director of the Agency could classify or declassify, what they felt appropriate, at any time, if THEY were the department or agency who did the initial classified marking.

Utter bullshit.

Declassification Frequently Asked Questions | OPEN | Department of Justice

 

[depotoo]

Comey admitted it in the hearing.

I would like to ask where did the Russian involvement in our election come from. The FBI never got to look at the DNC's computers or servers so how did they know the Russians were involved in the hacking since they never saw the democrats E-mails?

Via a COPY of the hard drive....there is not just the one server/hard drive....copies are made to get multiple experts reviewing it at the same time...

They never got a copy of the drives, the crooked democrats refused to cooperate.

{According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers.

Instead, the official said, the bureau and other agencies have relied on analysis done by the third-party security firm CrowdStrike, which investigated the breach for the DNC.}

FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report

As corrupt as the democrats are, they could not let law enforcement see their data.

 

[paperview]

He has the power to declassify, if they are.

Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president.
Politifact

are the tapes Trump says hes releasing classified ?

Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....

They are authorized to declassify anything their own departments created and classified.

Utterly false

Now you're just making shit up.

No it is NOT false. If you had paid attention during the Hillary server investigation, You would know that....there were several things the state dept felt should be declassified, and the department, with the Director of the department, was the only person who could declassify the documents ahead of their scheduled time...the secretaries of the department or the Director of the Agency could classify or declassify, what they felt appropriate, at any time, if THEY were the department or agency who did the initial classified marking.

Utter bullshit.

Declassification Frequently Asked Questions | OPEN | Department of Justice

Do you read your own links?

Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority.

(a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:

(1) the President and the Vice President;
(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President; and
(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Officials authorized to classify information at a specified level are also authorized to classify information at a lower level.
(c) Delegation of original classification authority.
(1) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the minimum required to administer this order. Agency heads are responsible for ensuring that designated subordinate officials have a demonstrable and continuing need to exercise this authority.

The President Executive Order 13526

 

[Uncensored2008]

He has the power to declassify, if they are.

Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president.
Politifact

Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....

They are authorized to declassify anything their own departments created and classified.

Utterly false

Now you're just making shit up.

No it is NOT false. If you had paid attention during the Hillary server investigation, You would know that....there were several things the state dept felt should be declassified, and the department, with the Director of the department, was the only person who could declassify the documents ahead of their scheduled time...the secretaries of the department or the Director of the Agency could classify or declassify, what they felt appropriate, at any time, if THEY were the department or agency who did the initial classified marking.

Utter bullshit.

Declassification Frequently Asked Questions | OPEN | Department of Justice

Do you read your own links?

Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority.

(a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:

(1) the President and the Vice President;
(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President; and
(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Officials authorized to classify information at a specified level are also authorized to classify information at a lower level.
(c) Delegation of original classification authority.
(1) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the minimum required to administer this order. Agency heads are responsible for ensuring that designated subordinate officials have a demonstrable and continuing need to exercise this authority.

The President Executive Order 13526

That's great, now what is the time frame for anyone but the president?

 

[paperview]

Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....

They are authorized to declassify anything their own departments created and classified.

Utterly false

Now you're just making shit up.

No it is NOT false. If you had paid attention during the Hillary server investigation, You would know that....there were several things the state dept felt should be declassified, and the department, with the Director of the department, was the only person who could declassify the documents ahead of their scheduled time...the secretaries of the department or the Director of the Agency could classify or declassify, what they felt appropriate, at any time, if THEY were the department or agency who did the initial classified marking.

Utter bullshit.

Declassification Frequently Asked Questions | OPEN | Department of Justice

Do you read your own links?

Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority.

(a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:

(1) the President and the Vice President;
(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President; and
(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Officials authorized to classify information at a specified level are also authorized to classify information at a lower level.
(c) Delegation of original classification authority.
(1) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the minimum required to administer this order. Agency heads are responsible for ensuring that designated subordinate officials have a demonstrable and continuing need to exercise this authority.

The President Executive Order 13526

That's great, now what is the time frame for anyone but the president?

When the original classification authority deems it to be unclassified, based on the information within.

Derp/

 

[paperview]

This is pointless as it regards Comey's memo. It was never classified in the first place.

 

[OKTexas]

Was Comey not communicating with the president as director of the FBI or not?

If the answer is yes, notes of that meeting ARE work product because he was working. Simple as that.
.

As soon as Trump goes popping off and talking about meetings with Comey then Comey has the right to defend himself. Especially if Trump is lying about the communications as Comey claims... Plain and simple

Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.

Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.


.

have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...

Read it for yourself.

3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.

https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf


.

1. Directors in most all cases sign a different agreement than underlings, or an additional one...at least that's how it was at all corporations I worked for....so we need to find the nondisclosure agreement that department heads have to sign....

2. If he did have to sign the common disclosure that his employees had to sign,

YOU NEGLECTED to read and post PAGE 2 of the disclosure agreement where it specifically defines what can not be released, and what Comey released is not protected from disclosure.


PROHIBITED DISCLOSURES
Employees shall not disclose the following types of information to unauthorized recipients, except in the performance
of official duties or as authorized under the Prepublication Review process.
Information protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended;
Information that is classified or the disclosure of which could harm national security;
Information that reveals sensitive law enforcement, intelligence, counterintelligence, or counterterrorism techniques,
sources, or methods of the FBI or any other governmental entity;
Information that would reveal grand jury material protected from disclosure by Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure;
Information that would tend to reveal the identity of a confidential source or the identity of a government agency or
authority or private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis;
Information that relates to any sensitive operational details or the substantive merits of any ongoing or open
investigation or case;
Proprietary information and trade secrets;
Information pertaining to wiretaps or intercepts, electronic communications (including storage mechanisms), or foreign
intelligence protected or regulated by Title III (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2510-2520) or F.I.S.A. (Title 50,
United States Code, Sections 1801-1862);
Information pertaining to currency transaction reports regulated or protected by Title 31, United States Code, Section
5313-5319;
Tax return information regulated or protected by Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103;
Information pertaining to contractor bids or proposals or source-selection information before the award of the
procurement contract to which the information relates;
Any other information the disclosure of which is prohibited by law, Executive Order, or regulation; or
Any other information that the FBI would have discretion to withhold from disclosure pursuant to civil discovery
obligations, the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, or any other statute, law, or regulation.

Well, I guess he assumed the memos would never be presented to a grand jury. OOPS


.

 

[Care4all]

As soon as Trump goes popping off and talking about meetings with Comey then Comey has the right to defend himself. Especially if Trump is lying about the communications as Comey claims... Plain and simple

Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.

Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.


.

have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...

Read it for yourself.

3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.

https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf


.

1. Directors in most all cases sign a different agreement than underlings, or an additional one...at least that's how it was at all corporations I worked for....so we need to find the nondisclosure agreement that department heads have to sign....

2. If he did have to sign the common disclosure that his employees had to sign,

YOU NEGLECTED to read and post PAGE 2 of the disclosure agreement where it specifically defines what can not be released, and what Comey released is not protected from disclosure.


PROHIBITED DISCLOSURES
Employees shall not disclose the following types of information to unauthorized recipients, except in the performance
of official duties or as authorized under the Prepublication Review process.
Information protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended;
Information that is classified or the disclosure of which could harm national security;
Information that reveals sensitive law enforcement, intelligence, counterintelligence, or counterterrorism techniques,
sources, or methods of the FBI or any other governmental entity;
Information that would reveal grand jury material protected from disclosure by Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure;
Information that would tend to reveal the identity of a confidential source or the identity of a government agency or
authority or private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis;
Information that relates to any sensitive operational details or the substantive merits of any ongoing or open
investigation or case;
Proprietary information and trade secrets;
Information pertaining to wiretaps or intercepts, electronic communications (including storage mechanisms), or foreign
intelligence protected or regulated by Title III (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2510-2520) or F.I.S.A. (Title 50,
United States Code, Sections 1801-1862);
Information pertaining to currency transaction reports regulated or protected by Title 31, United States Code, Section
5313-5319;
Tax return information regulated or protected by Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103;
Information pertaining to contractor bids or proposals or source-selection information before the award of the
procurement contract to which the information relates;
Any other information the disclosure of which is prohibited by law, Executive Order, or regulation; or
Any other information that the FBI would have discretion to withhold from disclosure pursuant to civil discovery
obligations, the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, or any other statute, law, or regulation.

Well, I guess he assumed the memos would never be presented to a grand jury. OOPS


.

no oops at all....

he wanted them in the hand of the special prosecutor and grand jury when they are called...Comey made certain he got them, and made certain the public knew about them so they could not be hidden.

 

[Camp]

Sure, Comey took private classified documents and gave them to a friend in hopes of damaging the President of the United States, his boss. in violation of federal law.

Hey, nitwit.....Comey SPECIFICALLY stated that what he gave to his friend was UN-classified memoranda.

Comey testified that he leaked his notes of private meetings with the President of the United States in his capacity as Director of the FBI to the New York Times. Trump has requested the AG Sessions prosecute Comey. I see bad times ahead for the little DNC lapdog.

This is the same misinformation and lies being repeated over and over here at USMB by the dishonest trump cult. No matter how much it is refuted and shown to be false. It is not fair to the readers of these boards that this happens. Purposful misinformation by a group of posters designed to mislead. Trump nor the official White House legal team has requested an investigation. That could be done very easily, but would have big legal implications. Instead, the personal lawyer for trump is proclaiming that he will submit a complaint. That is nowhere near the same as the President or his legal team making a request to AG Sessions.

 

[Bassman007]

How much do you have invested in the stock market, or is all of your money still tied up in Billy Beer

Since you asked About 5 million

5 million what? Billy Beer cans in your yard?

Believe it or not,,,,,,,
Total Accounts Value *

$5,130,074.28

LOL And with all that dough all you can find fit to do with your time, is completely ******* waste it here.................................

Fairly moronic...............

Next bullshit

Watching my buddies horse in the Belmont

In other words you shovel shit in the stable

 

[OKTexas]

Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.

Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.


.

have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...

Read it for yourself.

3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.

https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf


.

1. Directors in most all cases sign a different agreement than underlings, or an additional one...at least that's how it was at all corporations I worked for....so we need to find the nondisclosure agreement that department heads have to sign....

2. If he did have to sign the common disclosure that his employees had to sign,

YOU NEGLECTED to read and post PAGE 2 of the disclosure agreement where it specifically defines what can not be released, and what Comey released is not protected from disclosure.


PROHIBITED DISCLOSURES
Employees shall not disclose the following types of information to unauthorized recipients, except in the performance
of official duties or as authorized under the Prepublication Review process.
Information protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended;
Information that is classified or the disclosure of which could harm national security;
Information that reveals sensitive law enforcement, intelligence, counterintelligence, or counterterrorism techniques,
sources, or methods of the FBI or any other governmental entity;
Information that would reveal grand jury material protected from disclosure by Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure;
Information that would tend to reveal the identity of a confidential source or the identity of a government agency or
authority or private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis;
Information that relates to any sensitive operational details or the substantive merits of any ongoing or open
investigation or case;
Proprietary information and trade secrets;
Information pertaining to wiretaps or intercepts, electronic communications (including storage mechanisms), or foreign
intelligence protected or regulated by Title III (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2510-2520) or F.I.S.A. (Title 50,
United States Code, Sections 1801-1862);
Information pertaining to currency transaction reports regulated or protected by Title 31, United States Code, Section
5313-5319;
Tax return information regulated or protected by Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103;
Information pertaining to contractor bids or proposals or source-selection information before the award of the
procurement contract to which the information relates;
Any other information the disclosure of which is prohibited by law, Executive Order, or regulation; or
Any other information that the FBI would have discretion to withhold from disclosure pursuant to civil discovery
obligations, the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, or any other statute, law, or regulation.

Well, I guess he assumed the memos would never be presented to a grand jury. OOPS


.

no oops at all....

he wanted them in the hand of the special prosecutor and grand jury when they are called...Comey made certain he got them, and made certain the public knew about them so they could not be hidden.

Well I guess you need your fantasies, former AG and federal judge Mukasey says Trump violated no laws.


.

 

[eddiew]

Since you asked About 5 million

5 million what? Billy Beer cans in your yard?

Believe it or not,,,,,,,
Total Accounts Value *

$5,130,074.28

LOL And with all that dough all you can find fit to do with your time, is completely ******* waste it here.................................

Fairly moronic...............

Next bullshit

Watching my buddies horse in the Belmont

In other words you shovel shit in the stable

If that makes you happy go for it

 

[Camp]

have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...

Read it for yourself.

3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.

https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf


.

1. Directors in most all cases sign a different agreement than underlings, or an additional one...at least that's how it was at all corporations I worked for....so we need to find the nondisclosure agreement that department heads have to sign....

2. If he did have to sign the common disclosure that his employees had to sign,

YOU NEGLECTED to read and post PAGE 2 of the disclosure agreement where it specifically defines what can not be released, and what Comey released is not protected from disclosure.


PROHIBITED DISCLOSURES
Employees shall not disclose the following types of information to unauthorized recipients, except in the performance
of official duties or as authorized under the Prepublication Review process.
Information protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended;
Information that is classified or the disclosure of which could harm national security;
Information that reveals sensitive law enforcement, intelligence, counterintelligence, or counterterrorism techniques,
sources, or methods of the FBI or any other governmental entity;
Information that would reveal grand jury material protected from disclosure by Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure;
Information that would tend to reveal the identity of a confidential source or the identity of a government agency or
authority or private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis;
Information that relates to any sensitive operational details or the substantive merits of any ongoing or open
investigation or case;
Proprietary information and trade secrets;
Information pertaining to wiretaps or intercepts, electronic communications (including storage mechanisms), or foreign
intelligence protected or regulated by Title III (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2510-2520) or F.I.S.A. (Title 50,
United States Code, Sections 1801-1862);
Information pertaining to currency transaction reports regulated or protected by Title 31, United States Code, Section
5313-5319;
Tax return information regulated or protected by Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103;
Information pertaining to contractor bids or proposals or source-selection information before the award of the
procurement contract to which the information relates;
Any other information the disclosure of which is prohibited by law, Executive Order, or regulation; or
Any other information that the FBI would have discretion to withhold from disclosure pursuant to civil discovery
obligations, the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, or any other statute, law, or regulation.

Well, I guess he assumed the memos would never be presented to a grand jury. OOPS


.

no oops at all....

he wanted them in the hand of the special prosecutor and grand jury when they are called...Comey made certain he got them, and made certain the public knew about them so they could not be hidden.

Well I guess you need your fantasies, former AG and federal judge Mukasey says Trump violated no laws.


.

That statement from Mukasey means little to nothing. He is not a credible spokesperson after having disgraced his self in office and gotten caught lying while defending the Patriot Act. Does anyone remember that huge lie?
Law partner with Rudy Guiliani. Mukasey is a rejected nobody..

 

[OKTexas]

Read it for yourself.

3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.

https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf


.

1. Directors in most all cases sign a different agreement than underlings, or an additional one...at least that's how it was at all corporations I worked for....so we need to find the nondisclosure agreement that department heads have to sign....

2. If he did have to sign the common disclosure that his employees had to sign,

YOU NEGLECTED to read and post PAGE 2 of the disclosure agreement where it specifically defines what can not be released, and what Comey released is not protected from disclosure.


PROHIBITED DISCLOSURES
Employees shall not disclose the following types of information to unauthorized recipients, except in the performance
of official duties or as authorized under the Prepublication Review process.
Information protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended;
Information that is classified or the disclosure of which could harm national security;
Information that reveals sensitive law enforcement, intelligence, counterintelligence, or counterterrorism techniques,
sources, or methods of the FBI or any other governmental entity;
Information that would reveal grand jury material protected from disclosure by Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure;
Information that would tend to reveal the identity of a confidential source or the identity of a government agency or
authority or private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis;
Information that relates to any sensitive operational details or the substantive merits of any ongoing or open
investigation or case;
Proprietary information and trade secrets;
Information pertaining to wiretaps or intercepts, electronic communications (including storage mechanisms), or foreign
intelligence protected or regulated by Title III (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2510-2520) or F.I.S.A. (Title 50,
United States Code, Sections 1801-1862);
Information pertaining to currency transaction reports regulated or protected by Title 31, United States Code, Section
5313-5319;
Tax return information regulated or protected by Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103;
Information pertaining to contractor bids or proposals or source-selection information before the award of the
procurement contract to which the information relates;
Any other information the disclosure of which is prohibited by law, Executive Order, or regulation; or
Any other information that the FBI would have discretion to withhold from disclosure pursuant to civil discovery
obligations, the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, or any other statute, law, or regulation.

Well, I guess he assumed the memos would never be presented to a grand jury. OOPS


.

no oops at all....

he wanted them in the hand of the special prosecutor and grand jury when they are called...Comey made certain he got them, and made certain the public knew about them so they could not be hidden.

Well I guess you need your fantasies, former AG and federal judge Mukasey says Trump violated no laws.


.

That statement from Mukasey means little to nothing. He is not a credible spokesperson after having disgraced his self in office and gotten caught lying while defending the Patriot Act. Does anyone remember that huge lie?
Law partner with Rudy Guiliani. Mukasey is a rejected nobody..

Child with the lack of respect you've shown for the law, you have no standing in this conversation. Run along and roll yourself a joint.


.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Can anybody explain how Comey "Leaked" to the Times? He was putting out his response to Trumps tweets the "lies" that Comey claims Trump told in his statements about their encounters.

If Comey leaked, then didn't Trump leak first?

Umm, he actually said under oath he give it to a friend to hand off to a news outlet? Are you too stupid to even follow what the guy actually said?

Are you also unable to follow Comey's info was released before the Trump tweet? Which means he's full of shit.

It still wasn't a "leak".

At most, he could be called a whistle blower. Nothing illegal or top secret or classified.

Indeed, its trumpery who gives out state secrets.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com