Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
And you call yourself well informed? I would say higher taxes on the rich tax cuts on the Non rich,$12 minimum wage, legal pot, 1 month paid vacation, Healthcare daycare infrastructure. Of course as dupe you know nothing about Democrats except how evil and corrupt they are communists...Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
Look up reconciliation... I just told you.Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
That means it was higher or lower than the constant. You can tell whether things are getting better or worse, worse if you're talking the last 35 years.The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year, the constant. That is statistics that a normal person can understand. As opposed to a Republican dupe.So you don't understand statistics. Fine. typical Republican anywayI love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, when they shared 142% of national income.
Explain them to me. Use your liberal, Blue State math.
How did the top 10% plus all the workers end up with 142% of the national income?
Spell it out, your liberal genius can do it easily.....
.
The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year.
Thanks for admitting it's a useless statistic.
And you call yourself well informed? I would say higher taxes on the rich tax cuts on the Non rich,$12 minimum wage, legal pot, 1 month paid vacation, Healthcare daycare infrastructure. Of course as dupe you know nothing about Democrats except how evil and corrupt they are communists...Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
Look up reconciliation... I just told you.Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
You are an idiot. What is that referring to, the destruction of the middle class in what way?Reganism did in every way.That means it was higher or lower than the constant. You can tell whether things are getting better or worse, worse if you're talking the last 35 years.The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year, the constant. That is statistics that a normal person can understand. As opposed to a Republican dupe.So you don't understand statistics. Fine. typical Republican anyway
Explain them to me. Use your liberal, Blue State math.
How did the top 10% plus all the workers end up with 142% of the national income?
Spell it out, your liberal genius can do it easily.....
.
The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year.
Thanks for admitting it's a useless statistic.
You can tell whether things are getting better or worse,
No you can't.
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
National income in 1950 was $267 billion.
Civilian Employment Level < civilian employment
National income in 2007 was $12,321 billion.
Adjusted for inflation, $267 billion in Jan 1950 is worth $2,386 billion in December 2007.
$12,321 billion is 516% of $2,386 billion.
CPI Inflation Calculator
What's higher, $267 billion or $1,254.95 billion (92%/101% of $267 billion times 516%)?
View attachment 194983
National income < national income
View attachment 194985
Civilian employment Jan 1950 was 57,635,000 in Dec 2007 it was 146,273,000.
2.538 times the employed in 2007.
So, $267 billion/57,635,000 or $1,254.95 billion/146,273,000
$4632.60 in 1950 in 1950 dollars or $8579.50 in 2007 in 1950 dollars?
Looks like things are better...…..
Where have you been? I told you. You are a waste of time.Look up reconciliation... I just told you.Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
Look up the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
I just asked you.
All filibustered or blocked by the GOP. Read some thing.And you call yourself well informed? I would say higher taxes on the rich tax cuts on the Non rich,$12 minimum wage, legal pot, 1 month paid vacation, Healthcare daycare infrastructure. Of course as dupe you know nothing about Democrats except how evil and corrupt they are communists...Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
Were you stoned when you remembered the Republicans filibustering those bills? Or just drunk?
You are an idiot. What is that referring to, the destruction of the middle class in what way?Reganism did in every way.That means it was higher or lower than the constant. You can tell whether things are getting better or worse, worse if you're talking the last 35 years.The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year, the constant. That is statistics that a normal person can understand. As opposed to a Republican dupe.Explain them to me. Use your liberal, Blue State math.
How did the top 10% plus all the workers end up with 142% of the national income?
Spell it out, your liberal genius can do it easily.....
.
The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year.
Thanks for admitting it's a useless statistic.
You can tell whether things are getting better or worse,
No you can't.
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
National income in 1950 was $267 billion.
Civilian Employment Level < civilian employment
National income in 2007 was $12,321 billion.
Adjusted for inflation, $267 billion in Jan 1950 is worth $2,386 billion in December 2007.
$12,321 billion is 516% of $2,386 billion.
CPI Inflation Calculator
What's higher, $267 billion or $1,254.95 billion (92%/101% of $267 billion times 516%)?
View attachment 194983
National income < national income
View attachment 194985
Civilian employment Jan 1950 was 57,635,000 in Dec 2007 it was 146,273,000.
2.538 times the employed in 2007.
So, $267 billion/57,635,000 or $1,254.95 billion/146,273,000
$4632.60 in 1950 in 1950 dollars or $8579.50 in 2007 in 1950 dollars?
Looks like things are better...…..
Where have you been? I told you. You are a waste of time.Look up reconciliation... I just told you.Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
Look up the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
I just asked you.
All filibustered or blocked by the GOP. Read some thing.And you call yourself well informed? I would say higher taxes on the rich tax cuts on the Non rich,$12 minimum wage, legal pot, 1 month paid vacation, Healthcare daycare infrastructure. Of course as dupe you know nothing about Democrats except how evil and corrupt they are communists...Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services.
Is that what they did during Clinton's and Obama's 16 years? Why didn't Dems filibuster?
The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?
Yes. I want a diagram of the bill(s) that would have prevented our current ruin that were filibustered by the Republicans.
Were you stoned when you remembered the Republicans filibustering those bills? Or just drunk?
You are an idiot. What is that referring to, the destruction of the middle class in what way?Reganism did in every way.That means it was higher or lower than the constant. You can tell whether things are getting better or worse, worse if you're talking the last 35 years.The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year, the constant. That is statistics that a normal person can understand. As opposed to a Republican dupe.Explain them to me. Use your liberal, Blue State math.
How did the top 10% plus all the workers end up with 142% of the national income?
Spell it out, your liberal genius can do it easily.....
.
The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year.
Thanks for admitting it's a useless statistic.
You can tell whether things are getting better or worse,
No you can't.
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
National income in 1950 was $267 billion.
Civilian Employment Level < civilian employment
National income in 2007 was $12,321 billion.
Adjusted for inflation, $267 billion in Jan 1950 is worth $2,386 billion in December 2007.
$12,321 billion is 516% of $2,386 billion.
CPI Inflation Calculator
What's higher, $267 billion or $1,254.95 billion (92%/101% of $267 billion times 516%)?
View attachment 194983
National income < national income
View attachment 194985
Civilian employment Jan 1950 was 57,635,000 in Dec 2007 it was 146,273,000.
2.538 times the employed in 2007.
So, $267 billion/57,635,000 or $1,254.95 billion/146,273,000
$4632.60 in 1950 in 1950 dollars or $8579.50 in 2007 in 1950 dollars?
Looks like things are better...…..
[QU
You are an idiot. What is that referring to, the destruction of the middle class in what way?Reganism did in every way.
Actually, super dupe, that is only on your disgraceful propaganda machine. Real journalists in America try to point out you believe a pile a crap. Hillary is evil the rich pay too much in taxes, asking for benefits and pay is communist. You people are idiots.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
What? You mean the "You're all stupid racists!" campaign isn't winning their hearts and minds?
You're a total waste of time LOL! There that you look up the bills you idiot. You have no idea what's been going on the last 30 40 years.
