- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,023
- 47,212
- 2,180
Wrong.Virginia was and is an inseparable part of the UNITED States of America....Virginia was not carved out of some larger country.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wrong.Virginia was and is an inseparable part of the UNITED States of America....Virginia was not carved out of some larger country.
Then why do you keep doing it?Again, repeating this falsehood over and over will not alter reality.Federal troops were trespassing on the territory of South Carolina. .....
If you wish to honor individuals who rejected the United States Constitution, renounced their United States citizenship, attacked the United States, and slaughtered United States military defending the United States, you are free to erect your monuments to them on your private property. Sworn enemies of the United States have no places of honor anywhere on United States public land.
And again, reality does not change to satisfy your impotent bitterness.Wrong.Virginia was and is an inseparable part of the UNITED States of America....Virginia was not carved out of some larger country.
History is the proof. Reality is the proof. Every time it is PROVEN to you the "yeahbut yeahbut" starts with you. You are doing nothing but repeating idiotic falsehoods that have been DISPROVEN hundreds and hundreds of times on dozens of threads. You're nothing but a petulant child.Then why do you keep doing it?Again, repeating this falsehood over and over will not alter reality.Federal troops were trespassing on the territory of South Carolina. .....
You keep making these pronouncement without a shred of proof other than your own authority. Why do you expect anyone to accept your claims?
Nor yours. Prove you claims. Simply spewing your prejudices doesn't prove a thing.And again, reality does not change to satisfy your impotent bitterness.Wrong.Virginia was and is an inseparable part of the UNITED States of America....Virginia was not carved out of some larger country.
In other words, no proof.History is the proof. Reality is the proof. Every time it is PROVEN to you the "yeahbut yeahbut" starts with you. You are doing nothing but repeating idiotic falsehoods that have been DISPROVEN hundreds and hundreds of times on dozens of threads. You're nothing but a petulant child.Then why do you keep doing it?
You keep making these pronouncement without a shred of proof other than your own authority. Why do you expect anyone to accept your claims?
I wonder if some of the fantasists might also labor under the delusion of another "Big Lie" - that the sworn enemies of the United States won the war "in a landslide!"And again, reality does not change to satisfy your impotent bitterness.
And when Texas v White is mentioned, you will go back to "Those experts in Constitutional law on the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA were just poopy heads! I don't like them so it doesn't count! Waaaaa!" AGAIN. You're a predictable dimwit.Nor yours. Prove you claims. Simply spewing your prejudices doesn't prove a thing.And again, reality does not change to satisfy your impotent bitterness.Wrong.Virginia was and is an inseparable part of the UNITED States of America....Virginia was not carved out of some larger country.
I go back to the fact that four of them were Lincoln appointed hacks. The decisions also made a number of statements that are patently false, such as the claim that Texas was a state of the union at the time.And when Texas v White is mentioned, you will go back to "Those experts in Constitutional law on the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA were just poopy heads! I don't like them so it doesn't count! Waaaaa!" AGAIN. You're a predictable dimwit.Nor yours. Prove you claims. Simply spewing your prejudices doesn't prove a thing.And again, reality does not change to satisfy your impotent bitterness.Wrong.Virginia was and is an inseparable part of the UNITED States of America....Virginia was not carved out of some larger country.
Whether you object to others statues is your prerogative.If you wish to honor individuals who rejected the United States Constitution, renounced their United States citizenship, attacked the United States, and slaughtered United States military defending the United States, you are free to erect your monuments to them on your private property. Sworn enemies of the United States have no places of honor anywhere on United States public land.
My gosh, look at this nonsense. It appears all statues must come down...
Now the Statue of Liberty is cancelled! Washington Post writer claims famed figure is a 'meaningless symbol of hypocrisy' and 'unfulfilled promises'
"If the statue has had any kind of stable meaning over its lifetime, it is not as a symbol of liberty, but as a symbol of the misuse of liberty — as a hollow promise, unequally distributed and limited in its application to certain groups.'"
- Philip Kennicott, Pulitzer Prize winner, said statue no longer represented liberty
- Said it was a symbol of 'unfulfilled promises' due to America's history of racism
- The journalist added that the statue was irrelevant to non-white Americans
Washington Post writer calls Statue of Liberty a 'symbol of hypocrisy'
Philip Kennicott, a Pulitzer Prize winner, argued in an essay Saturday that the monument represented 'unfulfilled promises'.www.dailymail.co.uk
Whether you object to others statues is your prerogative.If you wish to honor individuals who rejected the United States Constitution, renounced their United States citizenship, attacked the United States, and slaughtered United States military defending the United States, you are free to erect your monuments to them on your private property. Sworn enemies of the United States have no places of honor anywhere on United States public land.
My gosh, look at this nonsense. It appears all statues must come down...
Now the Statue of Liberty is cancelled! Washington Post writer claims famed figure is a 'meaningless symbol of hypocrisy' and 'unfulfilled promises'
"If the statue has had any kind of stable meaning over its lifetime, it is not as a symbol of liberty, but as a symbol of the misuse of liberty — as a hollow promise, unequally distributed and limited in its application to certain groups.'"
- Philip Kennicott, Pulitzer Prize winner, said statue no longer represented liberty
- Said it was a symbol of 'unfulfilled promises' due to America's history of racism
- The journalist added that the statue was irrelevant to non-white Americans
Washington Post writer calls Statue of Liberty a 'symbol of hypocrisy'
Philip Kennicott, a Pulitzer Prize winner, argued in an essay Saturday that the monument represented 'unfulfilled promises'.www.dailymail.co.uk
Personally, I take exception to monuments being erected on United States public land to honor individuals who rejected the United States Constitution and waged war against the United States, slaughtering United States military who defended the United States.
I take exception to Brits interfering in our politics.Whether you object to others statues is your prerogative.If you wish to honor individuals who rejected the United States Constitution, renounced their United States citizenship, attacked the United States, and slaughtered United States military defending the United States, you are free to erect your monuments to them on your private property. Sworn enemies of the United States have no places of honor anywhere on United States public land.
My gosh, look at this nonsense. It appears all statues must come down...
Now the Statue of Liberty is cancelled! Washington Post writer claims famed figure is a 'meaningless symbol of hypocrisy' and 'unfulfilled promises'
"If the statue has had any kind of stable meaning over its lifetime, it is not as a symbol of liberty, but as a symbol of the misuse of liberty — as a hollow promise, unequally distributed and limited in its application to certain groups.'"
- Philip Kennicott, Pulitzer Prize winner, said statue no longer represented liberty
- Said it was a symbol of 'unfulfilled promises' due to America's history of racism
- The journalist added that the statue was irrelevant to non-white Americans
Washington Post writer calls Statue of Liberty a 'symbol of hypocrisy'
Philip Kennicott, a Pulitzer Prize winner, argued in an essay Saturday that the monument represented 'unfulfilled promises'.www.dailymail.co.uk
Personally, I take exception to monuments being erected on United States public land to honor individuals who rejected the United States Constitution and waged war against the United States, slaughtering United States military who defended the United States.
If you speak for the United States troops who were killed defending the nation, please explain your authority to do so.
Funny, the vets of that war, from the Union side, didn't mind.
What moral authority do you have, that is greater than that of the people that fought and bled to save teh union and free the slaves?
If you speak for the United States troops who were killed defending the nation, please explain your authority to do so.
Funny, the vets of that war, from the Union side, didn't mind.
What moral authority do you have, that is greater than that of the people that fought and bled to save teh union and free the slaves?
When I take exception to monuments erected on United States public land to honor individuals who rejected the United States Constitution and waged war against the United States, slaughtering United States military who defended the United States, I only speak for myself.
Abraham Linco;n was a racist and a war criminal.The fact that most of these anomalous impertinences were at the instigation of racists during the Jim Crow era speaks to their propriety from my perspective. I like to think the nation has progressed.
Oh look, the bitter nobody who is upset slavery went away is an authority on Constitutional law. You beg and beg for proof then whine like a little bitch "yeahbut yeahbut..."I go back to the fact that four of them were Lincoln appointed hacks. ...
Let the revisionist history go, wannabe.Abraham Linco;n was a racist and a war criminal.
All history is subject to revision, dumbass.Oh look, the bitter nobody who is upset slavery went away is an authority on Constitutional law. You beg and beg for proof then whine like a little bitch "yeahbut yeahbut..."I go back to the fact that four of them were Lincoln appointed hacks. ...
It's not subject to childish lies by bitter, impotent fools.All history is subject to revision, dumbass.Oh look, the bitter nobody who is upset slavery went away is an authority on Constitutional law. You beg and beg for proof then whine like a little bitch "yeahbut yeahbut..."I go back to the fact that four of them were Lincoln appointed hacks. ...