House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

lol....You claim that you people are going after those around Trump that broke the law, yet, you can't name a single law you're talking about, nor a single person...
Irrelevant cult crybabying.

Get back on topic, whiny, dipshit troll.
 
So, we all are just supposed to throw our hands up and do nothing to restore election integrity? Is that really what you think?
You had your chance up until January 6th 2021, with a January 20th 2021 deadline for congress to finalize the presidential vote.
After congress made the decision on January 7th, 2021 under the Constitution of the United States,

once the results of the January 6th joint session of Congress are certified, the decision is considered final, and Congress cannot simply "change their mind" and revisit the matter. The certification process is the final step in counting and validating the Electoral College votes, concluding the presidential election process.
 
Even the contingent electors validity in a scenario I have previously pointed out?
They’d have to change the law to do so, but that wouldn’t change the fact that the fake electors committed fraud.
You're dead wrong.
Not at all. Read the constitution. Article 2 tells us who counts the electoral votes and it ain’t the courts.
You didn't get the memos then?
I bet you never heard of the Eastman memo.
 
A riot.

But in all seriousness, it doesnt matter that he failed to convince people to do what he wanted. It’s fraud either way.
Lies.

"Peacefully and Patriotically let your voices be heard"-President Donald J Trump, Jan 6, 2021
 
Lies.

"Peacefully and Patriotically let your voices be heard"-President Donald J Trump, Jan 6, 2021
The whole reason he called his crazy brow shirt army to DC that day was because his political cronies wouldn’t steal the election the way he wanted.
 
They were legally cast ballots. That you want to toss out.
Nope. You are a liar.

They didn't have the required signature to make them legal. Therefore, under GA statute they are illegal.

Ya got nothing, Simp.
 
Inconsequential. The votes were recounted twice, including a hand recount with the same result each time.

Again, being delusional is not a valid defense. There was no real evidence of fraud. Just their delusional thinking.
300,000 illegal ballots in one county in a state Trump lost by less than 12,000.
 
They’d have to change the law to do so, but that wouldn’t change the fact that the fake electors committed fraud.
Exigent circumstances.
Not at all.
You were referring to Georgia fraud.
I bet you never heard of the Eastman memo.
Yes, and it directly addresses Trump's lawsuits. Pence shouldn't validate those states with legal objections in work, which could affect the electoral votes for those states.
 
There’s no controversy as to whether the fake electors were valid. We know they weren’t.

No other

There’s no controversy about which electors were real. We know the fake electors were fake.

No other electors were certified. That’s just a fact. The fake electors weren’t certified either. The courts don’t have the authority to tell Congress how to count electoral votes. Once the electors were certified on the safe harbor date, that’s it.

There is no purpose for the fake electors other than fraud.

It’s all in Smith’s report. Or you could read the Eastman memo and actually learn something.
Not fraud. Believe real hard moroner you might get it one day
 
Exigent circumstances.
Not an excuse to commit fraud.
You were referring to Georgia fraud.
Georgia certified their electors on the safe harbor date, which means by law Congress accepts them. No court can change that because courts have no authority over Congress counting electors.
Yes, and it directly addresses Trump's lawsuits. Pence shouldn't validate those states with legal objections in work, which could affect the electoral votes for those states.
Not Pence’s decision. Congress had the legal means to exclude electoral votes. The fake electors have nothing to do with it.

Yet again, more fraud on the part of Trump, using false allegations to try and steal the election.
 
Recounts are for sissies. Forensic audits are where the rubber meets the road.
The recount proved your quibble about unsigned tabulator tapes is inconsequential.
 
15th post
Not Pence’s decision.
He had the power to object those states counts.

Not an excuse to commit fraud.
You still keep side stepping my original question. Not surprised.
The recount proved your quibble about unsigned tabulator tapes is inconsequential.
I wasn't quibbling about that. Ballot individual signatures......proper ballot form and not photo copies....etc.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom