House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

[Marener]

Like I said, state, court's or Congress would have to decide on their validity in a rather extraordinary situation.

Biden in handcuffs in a state and no other electors were ever certified, what do you do?
Electors couldn't vote twice, as you pointed out that would be vote fraud.

Falsely.

There’s no controversy as to whether the fake electors were valid. We know they weren’t.

No other

Like I said, state, court's or Congress would have to decide on their validity in a rather extraordinary situation.

There’s no controversy about which electors were real. We know the fake electors were fake.

Biden in handcuffs in a state and no other electors were ever certified, what do you do?
Electors couldn't vote twice, as you pointed out that would be vote fraud.

No other electors were certified. That’s just a fact. The fake electors weren’t certified either. The courts don’t have the authority to tell Congress how to count electoral votes. Once the electors were certified on the safe harbor date, that’s it.

There is no purpose for the fake electors other than fraud.

Falsely.

It’s all in Smith’s report. Or you could read the Eastman memo and actually learn something.

 

[Delldude]

Inconsequential. The votes were recounted twice, including a hand recount with the same result each time.

Again, being delusional is not a valid defense. There was no real evidence of fraud. Just their delusional thinking.

They're scrambling down in Georgia and it's not the Republicans....

 

[Marener]

They're scrambling down in Georgia and it's not the Republicans....

Just goes to show that you guys are still delusional.

 

[Delldude]

There’s no controversy as to whether the fake electors were valid. We know they weren’t.

No other

There’s no controversy about which electors were real. We know the fake electors were fake.

No other electors were certified. That’s just a fact. The fake electors weren’t certified either. The courts don’t have the authority to tell Congress how to count electoral votes. Once the electors were certified on the safe harbor date, that’s it.

There is no purpose for the fake electors other than fraud.

It’s all in Smith’s report. Or you could read the Eastman memo and actually learn something.

Conveniently failed to address the scenario I pointed out.

 

[Delldude]

Just goes to show that you guys are still delusional.

Realists

 

[Marener]

Conveniently failed to address the scenario I pointed out.

Your scenario is not consistent with the constitution. Electors are certified to Congress on the safe harbor date. Courts have no authority to change anything after that date. The constitution grants that authority to Congress and Congress alone.

 

[Marener]

Realists

You guys looked for 5 years and all you could find is an inconsequential gripe.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Haha, they are not "scrambling" in Georgia. They just gave the middle finger to the Trump administration and their pathetic effort to soothe the criminal president.

 

[Delldude]

Your scenario is not consistent with the constitution. Electors are certified to Congress on the safe harbor date. Courts have no authority to change anything after that date. The constitution grants that authority to Congress and Congress alone.

Biden found guilty in one of Trump's lawsuits...... Trump wins the state now. Electors previously cast their votes for Biden.

Now what?

 

[meaner gene]

315,000 ballots found in Fulton county GA, fraudulent. Sooooooooo

Actually, once congress certifies the certificates, that's the final word on their validity.

Any flaws, errors, inaccuracies or changes are moot, because congress makes the final legal determination.

 

[Delldude]

You guys looked for 5 years and all you could find is an inconsequential gripe.

Not looking that way now.

 

[j-mac]

I'm not your mommy. Go troll someone dumber than you. Good luck finding such a person.

So, once again you throw bull shit out there with NOTHING to back it up....Got it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So, once again you throw bull shit out there with NOTHING to back it up....Got it.

Yes, you go ahead and blame me for the fact that you are an ignorant dipshit.

We are all very impressed.

 

[Marener]

Biden found guilty in one of Trump's lawsuits...... Trump wins the state now. Electors previously cast their votes for Biden.

Now what?

Congress decides what to do with the electors for that state.

Not the courts.

Not a group of Republican operatives meeting in secret.

 

[j-mac]

Actually, once congress certifies the certificates, that's the final word on their validity.

Any flaws, errors, inaccuracies or changes are moot, because congress makes the final legal determination.

It may be too late now, but it's not too late to get to the bottom of it, and ensure it can't happen again.

 

[Marener]

Not looking that way now.

It would if you knew what you were talking about.

 

[meaner gene]

Biden found guilty in one of Trump's lawsuits...... Trump wins the state now. Electors previously cast their votes for Biden.

Now what?

Actually, once congress certifies the certificates, that's the final word on their validity.

Any flaws, errors, inaccuracies or changes are moot, because congress makes the final legal determination.

 

[meaner gene]

It may be too late now, but it's not too late to get to the bottom of it, and ensure it can't happen again.

Actually you're in a bind, because district court judges no longer have the power to make national level decisions. And no court of appeals can review the case because no party has standing unless it's a "live" controversy.

 

[meaner gene]

It may be too late now, but it's not too late to get to the bottom of it, and ensure it can't happen again.

Legal standing requires a party to have a direct, personal stake in a lawsuit, proving they suffered (or will imminently suffer) a concrete injury, caused by the defendant, that a court decision can fix; this ensures courts only hear real "cases or controversies," with core elements being Injury in Fact, Causation, and Redressability.

 

[j-mac]

Yes, you go ahead and blame me for the fact that you are an ignorant dipshit.

We are all very impressed.

lol....You claim that you people are going after those around Trump that broke the law, yet, you can't name a single law you're talking about, nor a single person...And when called on it, you respond with name calling, and vitriol...Sounds like you're the ignorant dipshit there buddy.

Actually you're in a bind, because district court judges no longer have the power to make national level decisions. And no court of appeals can review the case because no party has standing unless it's a "live" controversy.

So, we all are just supposed to throw our hands up and do nothing to restore election integrity? Is that really what you think?