House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

The recount proved your quibble about unsigned tabulator tapes is inconsequential.
the recount was invalid illegal ballots. Now proven. it is what Jan 6 was about. It's now proven the effort was clean and every judge was bought.
 
the recount was invalid illegal ballots. Now proven. it is what Jan 6 was about. It's now proven the effort was clean and every judge was bought.
How was it proven?

How was it proven the voters cast illegal ballots.
 
What made the ballots “illegal”?
Didn't have the required election officials signature that proves chain of custody, Moroner.

Do you ever get your info anywhere besides MSDNC?
 
The contingent electors submitted in 1960 were submitted by the Governor per court order.

They were not submitted to Congress by the party.

WW
Cite?

Everything I've read said they did it independently

Both parties decided to send their own slate of electors to Congress. They did it openly.

The certificates describe the three Democrats as the “duly and legally appointed and qualified” members of the Electoral College. The envelope containing the certificates, stamped Dec. 22, 1960, includes another avowal: “We hereby certify that the lists of all the votes of the state of Hawaii given for president … are contained herein.” The documents do not mention the ongoing recount or that Nixon’s Hawaii victory had been certified.
 
I’m about 4:45 into the video. Simple Jack is saying that the Rinos in GA were the ones who told Trump the election was fair, so Trump committed fraud by having the opinion that the election was rigged. Simple Jack is a nut job.
Which is hilariously stupid and wrong and is, basically, a lie on your part, as it is not what was said or implied.
 
My point is that they knew what they were asking Pence to do was illegal.
It was theoretical. You conveniently forget to mention a lot of the content of the memo. Not surprised.

The Eastman memo says that Pence would refuse to count the votes from the 7 states with fake electors and declare Trump the winner.
Hypothetically possible based upon Trumps lawsuits.
 
The scheme was purported in numerous states.

Your counter argument is pathetic.
You're the one that cited the Arizona declaration and then claimed they sneaked into the capital.
 
Didn't have the required election officials signature that proves chain of custody, Moroner.

Do you ever get your info anywhere besides MSDNC?
So, legally cast ballots that had a procedural error.

So, why do YOU want to exclude them?
 
15th post
It was theoretical. You conveniently forget to mention a lot of the content of the memo. Not surprised.
It’s what they asked Pence to do, so it’s hardly theoretical. You can quote anything from the memo you like. The fact remains that the purpose of the fake electors was to muddy the waters to give them an excuse to exclude the valid electors of 7 states. That’s fraud. That’s depriving Americans of their right to representation.
Hypothetically possible based upon Trumps lawsuits.
Not according to the Eastman memo. The lawsuits played no role.
 
Who the **** is this guy to determine that Trump or ANYONE's First Amendment rights are CANCELED just because this ASSHOLE uses the term FRAUD as to question a "lawful government function"?
:cuckoo: 🤡 :rolleyes:
EXPLAIN lawful government function.
 
Didn't have the required election officials signature that proves chain of custody, Moroner.

Do you ever get your info anywhere besides MSDNC?
That doesn’t make the ballots illegal.

That’s also not what happened. The signature was for the tabulator tape, not the ballots.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom