You know this term "Deem-and-pass" was never used, never contrived, never existed, anywhere, until this year? But the procedure has always existed...
It is, basically, voting on a recon bill or ammendment, while voting on the underlying bill (in this case the budget) at the same time. That's all. Positively no different in consequence than passing the underlying bill, then passing the amendment. It's procedural. Nothing new, no seedy, dark X-files smoking man stuff.....
You may be correct, but what is really "low life" about it is that they avoid having to say they voted on it. It's called deflection on the tough decisions, and aren't held accountable when facing their constituents.
It's not the way to pass major legislation.
I'd say it's more like lawmakers who want the amendments in order to approve the budget wanting to ensure that the budget doesn't pass, then the amendments fail. A little bit like a gas station demanding you pay before you pump. It just gets the thing done faster than re-writing the entire budget.
Maybe it's not the best way to pass major legislation. But it's not sleazy or tricky or anything like that. Like I said, completely identical to passing the underlying bill, then the amendment.
If you hate the budget, lets attack it. But the procedure? It just ain't the conspiracy some of you want it to be.