Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, they didn't.Are you morons attempting to lie reality away again? The FBI acknowledged the authenticity of year ago.
Recently the Democratic Party is all about projection. It accuses the Republican Party of doing exactly what the Democratic Party is doing.projection.
and it is amazing that as many times as they have done that and then caught with their own 'hands in the cookie jar'....people just will not see it.Recently the Democratic Party is all about projection. It accuses the Republican Party of doing exactly what the Democratic Party is doing.
The sad part is many sheeple believe that propaganda.
The Democrats must realize that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia but refuse to act. They should have invoked the 25th Amendment to remove him from office by now.Neither party wants to act like adults anymore, shameful-OG
Republicans hoping to seize control of the House in November are already setting their sights on what is, for many of them, a top priority next year: impeaching President Biden.
A number of rank-and-file conservatives have already introduced impeachment articles in the current Congress against the president. They accuse Biden of committing “high crimes” in his approach to a range of issues touching on border enforcement, the coronavirus pandemic and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
Those resolutions never had a chance of seeing the light of day, with Democrats holding a narrow control of the lower chamber. But with Republicans widely expected to win the House majority in the midterms, many of those same conservatives want to tap their new potential powers to oust a president they deem unfit. Some would like to make it a first order of business.
“I have consistently said President Biden should be impeached for intentionally opening our border and making Americans less safe,” said Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.). “Congress has a duty to hold the President accountable for this and any other failures of his Constitutional responsibilities, so a new Republican majority must be prepared to aggressively conduct oversight on day one.”
The conservative impeachment drive is reminiscent of that orchestrated by liberals four years ago, as Democrats took control of the House in 2019 under then-President Trump. At the time, a small handful of vocal progressives wanted to impeach Trump, largely over accusations that he’d obstructed a Justice Department probe into Russian ties to his 2016 campaign. The idea was repeatedly rejected by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), not least out of fear that it would alienate voters in tough battleground districts.
The tide turned when a whistleblower accused Trump of pressuring a foreign power to find dirt on his political opponent — a charge that brought centrist Democrats onto the impeachment train. With moderates on board, Pelosi launched a formal impeachment inquiry in September of 2019, eight months after taking the Speaker’s gavel. Three months later, the House impeached Trump on two counts related to abusing power.
The difference between then and now is that liberals, in early 2019, were fighting a lonely battle with scant support. This year, heading into the midterms, dozens of conservatives have either endorsed Biden’s impeachment formally, or have suggested they’re ready to support it.
At least eight resolutions to impeach Biden have been offered since he took office: Three related to his handling of the migrant surge at the southern border; three targeting his management of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan last year; one denouncing the eviction moratorium designed to help renters during the pandemic; and still another connected to the overseas business dealings of his son, Hunter Biden.
Those proposals will expire with the end of this Congress. But some of the sponsors are already vowing to revisit them quickly next year. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), the lead sponsor of four of the impeachment resolutions, is among them.
“She believes Joe Biden should have been impeached as soon as he was sworn in, so of course she wants it to happen as soon as possible,” Nick Dyer, a Greene spokesman, said Monday in an email.
A noisy impeachment push from the GOP’s right flank could create headaches for Rep. Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), the Republican leader in line to be Speaker, and other party brass just as the 2024 presidential cycle heats up.
On the one hand, impeaching Biden could alienate moderate voters and hurt the GOP at the polls, as was the case in 1998 following the impeachment of President Clinton. Already, GOP leaders like Sen. Mitch McConnell (Ky.) are throwing cold water on the impeachment talk, suggesting it could damage Republicans politically in the midterms.
On the other hand, ignoring the conservatives’ impeachment entreaties might spark a revolt from a Republican base keen to avenge the Democrats’ two impeachments of Trump, who remains the most popular national figure in the GOP. McCarthy knows well the perils of angering the far right: The Freedom Caucus had nudged Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) into an early retirement in 2015, deeming him insufficiently conservative, then prevented McCarthy from replacing him.
McCarthy’s office did not respond Monday to a request for comment.
The challenge facing Republican leaders in a GOP-controlled House will be to demonstrate an aggressive posture toward the administration, to appease conservatives, without alienating moderate voters in the process.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) appears to be walking that line. Last summer, she called Biden “unfit to serve as president,” but stopped short of endorsing his impeachment.
Stefanik’s office did not respond to requests for comment.
Another strategy GOP leaders may adopt is to impeach a high-ranking member of the administration, but not the president himself. Several resolutions have been introduced to do just that, separately targeting Vice President Harris, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Attorney General Merrick Garland.
McCarthy, during a visit to the southern border earlier in the year, had floated the idea of impeaching Mayorkas if he is found to be “derelict” in his job of securing the border. And the concept has plenty of support among conservatives.
“Mayorkas and Garland have purposefully made our country less safe, politicized their departments, and violated the rule of law. In some instances, they have instructed their subordinates to disobey our laws. That is unacceptable,” Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), who has endorsed a number of impeachment resolutions this year, said in an email.
“Next January I expect the House to pursue my impeachment articles against Mayorkas as well as Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene’s impeachment articles that I co-sponsored against Attorney General Merrick Garland,” Biggs added.
Still, conservatives like Biggs, the former head of the Freedom Caucus, also want to go straight to the top by impeaching Biden. And it remains unclear if anything less than that will appease the GOP’s restive right flank — one that’s expected to grow next year with the arrival of a number of pro-Trump conservatives vowing to take on anyone they consider to be part of Washington’s political establishment.
Some Republicans said the decision whether to endorse impeachment next year will simply hinge on events. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), for instance, has endorsed two impeachment resolutions this cycle related to the Afghanistan withdrawal, but “has made no decisions yet on supporting impeachment articles next year with Republicans in the majority,” according to spokesman Austin Livingston.
“He will wait to see what those efforts look like, specifically how they align with Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution,” Livingston said, referring to the section outlining Congress’s impeachment powers.
White House to boost monkeypox vaccination through large LGBTQ events
Who is Muqtada al-Sadr, Iraqi cleric whose resignation sparked protests?
But others are eager to use a GOP majority to hold Biden’s feet to the fire. And that energy doesn’t appear to be fleeting, particularly when it comes to the border crisis, which could very well remain a hot topic six months from now.
Rep. Mary Miller (R), a strong Trump supporter who recently won an Illinois primary over the more moderate Rep. Rodney Davis (R), said Biden should be removed “for purposely ignoring our immigration laws.”
“Biden and Harris have failed their most basic duty,” Miller said, “which is ensuring the safety of the American people through the security of our borders.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3...impeach-biden/
No, they didn't.
www.foxnews.com
Come on, the New York Post? A freakin' fascist tabloid? That's what you're using to base your propaganda on?
I think everyone here is embarrassed on your behalf. I get that Goebbels instructed you to use the BigLie as often as possible, but he meant for you not to suck at it so badly.
Serisiously, just stick with licking Nazi rectums. At least you're good at that.
i’m talking about parody…adam shifty admitted he used parodyJust what _are_ you babbing about, kook?
Try to remember that normal people don't get fed your fascist cult conspiracy theories, so you have to explain what they are.
Recently the Democratic Party is all about projection. It accuses the Republican Party of doing exactly what the Democratic Party is doing.
The sad part is many sheeple believe that propaganda.
It would be nice if the democrats didn’t have the liberal media on their side.Apparently the "2+2=5" schtick is real popular with them as well. Inconvenient truth? Just lie - no worries that these are established facts - just lie and be aggressive.
The Nazi democrats have jettisoned any mooring to reality.
What crock of steaming feces."You impeached Trump for good reasons, so we're going to make up fake reasons to impeach you!"
No, the two parties are not alike. The Democrats are moral, the Republicans are corrupt liars and traitors, destined for the deepest pits in Hell.
I mean you only have that best intentions for Republicans. They should totally listen to you...Republicans would do better at dumping all the absolute bullshit except the border you won't convict but you could bring the issue to the forefront if done in an even, un racist manner.
Stress the impact upon lower class Americans, lack of control and open border for drugs.
You have that ass-backwards. "You impeached Trump for fake reasons, so we're going to use real reasons to impeach you!""You impeached Trump for good reasons, so we're going to make up fake reasons to impeach you!"
No, the two parties are not alike. The Democrats are moral, the Republicans are corrupt liars and traitors, destined for the deepest pits in Hell.
The Democrats made up things that Trump supposedly said and did regarding the Zelensky phone call that were bald-faced lies. The transcript of the call proved them to be liars.Trump cultists, remember that you can't gaslight anyone outside of your liars' cult. That only works on your fellow Stalinist cult apparatchiks, and even they only pretend to believe your lies.
The Democrats laid out their case against Trump in detail.
The Republicans didn't even attempt a defense. They just said "Screw you, we're Republicans, we can commit any crime we want."
That tells a normal person they couldn't make any defense.
The corruption of the Trump cultists is clearly not normal.
There has to be something deeper about this border thing that the American people are missing.I don't see this happening. The most viable reason would probably be your border, that might be the worst self destructive policy that is unsustainable and is in effect a path to lost sovereignty.
However, even there, the GOP have been lock step in support of open borders for decades. Paul Ryan even went so far as to disuade Trump from taking the $25B offer from Schumer to fund the wall. How much would that decision have saved American taxpayers by now?
Never, and therefore his sister democrats will always believe it is there. Probably kept hidden by Rupert Murdoch.when is Schiff going to release that 'gotcha' evidence he had in the first Impeachment?
Yes, and so was his first.Why was the second impeachment basically a 'raise your hand if you want trump impeached' with minimum discussion?
he was railroaded both times.
if you were honest, you'd admit it.
Trump cultist?
Boy, do YOU have a wrong number.
I hope they impeach Biden. Not that I can name any high crime and misdemeanor that he committed. The Dems never names one that trump committed either. I'm happy to see impeachments of any president as an "on steriods" version of the endless hearings that the party that controls congress holds when the opposing party holds the White House.
Not being sarcastic. Government will provide bread or circuses. Hearings and impeachments are circuses, which the clowns of government are good at presenting. When government has time to start "helping" us with our bread is when we really have problems. Look at today's economy for evidence of that.
Never, and therefore his sister democrats will always believe it is there. Probably kept hidden by Rupert Murdoch.
Yes, and so was his first.
So was Clinton's and so was Johnson's more than a century ago. Impeachments are decided well before they are voted on. The show trial that follows never changes the outcome. Johnson used the relatively slow process to campaign against impeachment outside of the trial, and that probably saved him.
The difference was that Trump's second impeachment was rushed to get it in before Trump left office. They wanted to claim that they impeached him because a sitting president could not be indicted and prosecuted for his obvious crimes while in office.
Now out of office for more than 600 days, Trump has yet to be indicted after a seven year investigation.
It took about 780 days of investigating Nixon for the Watergate break in, until Nixon resigned.I hope they impeach Biden. Not that I can name any high crime and misdemeanor that he committed. The Dems never names one that trump committed either. I'm happy to see impeachments of any president as an "on steriods" version of the endless hearings that the party that controls congress holds when the opposing party holds the White House.
Not being sarcastic. Government will provide bread or circuses. Hearings and impeachments are circuses, which the clowns of government are good at presenting. When government has time to start "helping" us with our bread is when we really have problems. Look at today's economy for evidence of that.
Never, and therefore his sister democrats will always believe it is there. Probably kept hidden by Rupert Murdoch.
Yes, and so was his first.
So was Clinton's and so was Johnson's more than a century ago. Impeachments are decided well before they are voted on. The show trial that follows never changes the outcome. Johnson used the relatively slow process to campaign against impeachment outside of the trial, and that probably saved him.
The difference was that Trump's second impeachment was rushed to get it in before Trump left office. They wanted to claim that they impeached him because a sitting president could not be indicted and prosecuted for his obvious crimes while in office.
Now out of office for more than 600 days, Trump has yet to be indicted after a seven year investigation.
Then how was Trump impeached so fast the second time?It took about 780 days of investigating Nixon for the Watergate break in, until Nixon resigned.
Investigations start at bottom and work their way up, which takes time, especially in DOJ....and especially when a former president is involved.
It took about 780 days of investigating Nixon for the Watergate break in, until Nixon resigned.
Investigations start at bottom and work their way up, which takes time, especially in DOJ....and especially when a former president is involved.
Nixon was a choirboy compared to JFK. It wasn't the Sherlock Holmes congress that brought Nixon down. It was the media, who hated Nixon worse than any president in history because he talked about how biased they were.So hounding political enemies works?
Nixon was choirboy compared to Bill Clinton.
Clinton is a choirboy compared to Adolf Biden.
