pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 73,695
- 28,783
- 2,210
the result is that red states have more virus spreadIf we didnt have BLUE STATE LOCKDOWNS unemployment would be at 3% and there would be no need to bankrupt the country.Of course they won’t. Senate Republicans didn’t want any relief funding. Attaching it to the spending bill was the only way to get them to vote on any relief at all. $600 is all they could get.The senate won't go for this....
The Republicans have blocked it all year.
I thought you leftists complained about all the money being spent during Trumps 4 years.
Could you please quit being such damn hypocrites?
There is virtually NO DIFFERENCE between the FREE states and the LOCKDOWN states.
In other threads I pointed this out in the comparison of lockdown Michigan and relatively free Indiana
bullshit
Why do per capita COVID-19 Case Rates Differ Between U.S. States?
Background The popular press has explored the differences among U.S. states in rates of COVID-19 cases, mostly focusing on political party differences, and often mentioning that political party differences in health outcomes are confounded by demographic and socio-economic differences between...www.medrxiv.org
Indiana has 2/3 the population of michigan.
Indiana has 2/3 the covid deaths of Michigan
And, Cuomo's New York has double the population of Michigan with FOUR TIMES THE COVID DEATHS
NYC has almost as much of the population of Michigan all packed into one small area.
Sucks to be New York. That has been a blue state solution for a long time. Herd the masses into the cities and give the "fly over country" back to nature.
Blue state solutions have always been a failure. Kinda like putting covid patients in with the most vulnerable. Honestly, even a moron could have predicted what would happen
For good or bad, it should be noted.