Hope Hicks expected to testify in Trump hush money trial

Hush money is not the issues because it’s fine for consenting adults to mutually agree to remain silent and receive money
So, lib loons now dig down to a theoretical 2nd and 3rd level about he must Prove Himself Innocent concerning how he got and spent his own money.
It’s Witch Hunting in its purest form
 
It's funny because YOU are the victim.
"How is that?"; you may yelp, bark, or scream otherwise.
Well, here's Uncle Yuri to explain just that!
From way-back in 1985.......


Interviewer: The Soviets use the phase, “ideological subversion”. What do they mean by that?

Bezmenov: Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate overt and open. You can see it with your own eyes. All you have to do, all the American mass media has to do is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes and they can see. There’s no mystery. There’s nothing to do with espionage.

I know espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic, it sells more deodorants through their advertising, probably. That’s why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type of thrillers. But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all! According to my opinion, and the opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, (2 Russian words, активные something, I couldn’t catch it) in the language of the KGB, or psychological warfare.

What it basically means is, to change the perception of reality of every American to such as extent that in spite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country.

It’s a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages, the first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which is required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of your enemy. In other words, Marxism / Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism.

The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years, actually it’s over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success.

Most of it is being done by Americans to Americans thanks to a lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he’s going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crushes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.


The next stage is destabilization. This time, the subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby, it doesn’t matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation, what matters is essentials, the economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist / Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.

The next stage of course is crisis. It may take only up to 6 weeks to bring a country up to the verge of crisis. You can see them in Central America now.
And after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have a period of so called normalization. It may last indefinitely. Normalization is a cynical expression born from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in ’68, Comrade Brezhnev said, “Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized!” This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all these smucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and a paradise on earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition, and to put a Big Brother government in Washington D.C. With benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of things, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not.
_______________________________

The More You Know...................
 
So if you don't like a defendant we can deny him the presumption of innocence?... is that really the kind of country you want to live in?....
you know.... if these child like judges would think about what they do to him and how it will cause an appeal maybe just maybe they could really "get Trump" but they can't control their hate for him long enough to follow the constitution and do this the right way... they are like you but with a black robe...

Leftists live in the kind of country they’re told to live in.
 
Didn’t Michael Cohen already go to jail for this crime?

A crime he committed with Trump
 
Prior restraint of freedom of speech is presumed to be improper and can only pass the test when it is ordered with special and clear necessity and accords proper prior notice to the impacted parties.

For example:

We do not here challenge the principle that there are special, limited circumstances in which speech is so interlaced with burgeoning violence that it is not protected by the broad guarantee of the First Amendment. In Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S.296, at 308 (1940), this Court said that "[n]o one would have the hardihood to suggest that the principle of freedom of speech sanctions incitement to riot." See also Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315U.S. 568, 572 (1942); Milk Wagon Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Dairies, 312 U.S. 287, 294 (1941). Ordinarily, the State's constitutionally permissible interests are adequately served by criminal *181penalties imposed after freedom to speak has been so grossly abused that its immunity is breached. The impact and consequences of subsequent punishment for such abuse are materially different from those of prior restraint. Prior restraint upon speech suppresses the precise freedom which the First Amendment sought to protect against abridgment.[5].
The Court has emphasized that "[a] system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity." Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 (1963); Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51, 57 (1965).
Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968).

Despite this, we know that Courts sometimes do issue gag orders on plaintiffs and defendants. But the reasons in favor of a gag order have to be very specific and highly warranted.

Footnote 5 added some significant information:

[5] The elimination of prior restraints was a "leading purpose" in the adoption of the First Amendment. See Lovell v. Griffin, 303 U.S. 444, at 451-452 (1938).
Carroll, id., at fn 5.

Of course, normally, gag orders are designed to protect the right of the accused to a fair trial. It can be used to insulate the defendant from the improper attempt of a prosecutor to try their case in the media (likely hissing a jury pool). But this gag order seeks to gag the former President around the time of a trial on the even of a Presidential election. It isn’t the right of this defendant the court is concerned with, obviously.
 
I don’t care who she is. The case is a joke. That’s all that matters.
We are talking about the case where:

1) trump committed adultery with a Porn Star......Right
2) trump paid the Porn Star $130,000 to keep quiet....Right
 
He knows exactly what he's doing despite his surging dementia.

INTIMIDATION: Why is Trump posting photos of Judge Merchan's daughter?'s daughter?

INTIMIDATION: Why is Trump posting photos of Judge Merchan's daughter?

Judge Merchan needs to drop the hammer on Trump!
Bullshit.

Context matters.

Here is the screenshot of the Trump truth post:

IMG_0905.jpeg

It relates to the story about her company which has made millions of dollars off of this Trump persecution. She has fucking pencilneck Schiff as a major client.

The valid complaint is that this implicates the judge as being biased. (As do some of his rulings.)

The daughter’s photo is shared because she is a major part of the story of the claim that the judge should recuse his own ass. She made herself a public figure.

Here is the story in the post:

 

Forum List

Back
Top