Debate Now Honest Debate About Abortion: Rules Posted

The anger factor was with the unlimited abortion people, that is wearing out now that time has passed.

Just wait until another Gosnell pops up and can't be prosecuted because State like NY and CA have laws that allow abortion for any reason up until the second before birth.
But you’re not waiting for a girl/woman to bleed out in a hospital parking lot because she hasn’t suffered enough for the forced birth state.
 
When society claims the acts by women where they terminate the life of their own child, at any stage of its development is fine, that society is doomed to die. Politicians talk as if they are doctors of medicine. They are primarily lawyers I believe. Not all are lawyers, but they have an abundance of lawyers in their midst. Put more effort into saving the lives of the not born children and less into saving lives of convicted killers of humans. You will feel better at the end of the day.
Come on bob, why the bullshit post again.
 
But you’re not waiting for a girl/woman to bleed out in a hospital parking lot because she hasn’t suffered enough for the forced birth state.

Another pointless non-response.
 
We see the maga attempt to sideline/silence subject matter expects on subjects like climate change and the affects of gun violence because the facts don’t back them.
Since you went to climate, we have several climate issues threads operating. What is gun violence? Do guns have intelligence? Guns for citizens happens to be a right realized by the founders which is in the constitution. Can you show us any violent guns?
 
But you’re not waiting for a girl/woman to bleed out in a hospital parking lot because she hasn’t suffered enough for the forced birth state.
I have lost two children terminated by two women to abortion. Have you lost children to abortion?
 
Just one example. there are plenty more.

Non response is noted.
Can they match a Don't say Gay law?

Or are they just more defending white guys who blame the Holocaust on them?
 
Most of the prolife reasoning for outlawing abortion is based on the fetus being a human being, a person. Thus destroying featus is committing murder.

So if the accepted definition of a human being does not include the unborn (fetus), then there is little justification for banning abortion.

A man, woman, or child of the species Homo sapiens, distinguished from other animals by superior mental development, power of articulate speech, and upright stance.

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
1 U.S. Code Section 8

A human being is a human child or adult.
Again, you said a "human" can only be called as such if they have articulate speech and are able to stand upright.

By that logic, it would be okay to kill a 6 month old baby.

Perhaps you should drop the "dictionary-only" approach and attempt to dabble into the actual issue. You're like a robot here, one that is advocating for infanticide.
 
Nothing wrong or immoral about heckling when the target is worthy of the aim.
Sounds like what a true tyrannical fascist would say. Anyone can think anything is "worthy" of it.

I doubt you'd hold the same standard if such practices harmed your representatives.
 
"Tyranny is saying the other side has no right to their opinion. That's only coming from the left these days" is a deliberate right wing falsehood.
It's the left actively trying to push right-wing beliefs from the public sphere and overton window through intimidation, attacks on livelihood, and censorship. It's not absolute, but the point has merit.
 
Sounds like what a true tyrannical fascist would say. Anyone can think anything is "worthy" of it.

I doubt you'd hold the same standard if such practices harmed your representatives.
No, it sounds like what you would do. Don't preach against what you do.
 
there are so many on the left who are not happy with "leave it to the states"
Of course they're not happy.. because they want their ideology imposed on the entire country.

The fact that some people in other portions of the country might have different laws than the ones they demand is something they cannot stand.
 
It's the left actively trying to push right-wing beliefs from the public sphere and overton window through intimidation, attacks on livelihood, and censorship. It's not absolute, but the point has merit.
Simple blather. Now we will watch Harris pursue and prosecute Trump as well as uphold our American heritage.
 
Back
Top Bottom