Homosexuality is like Cancer

Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Tell me; are you Muslim because I understand it's Muslims who hate gays?
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Little Nipper: you are a sad, sad little person. And, your analogy is falacious. Cancer kills people. Homosexuality does not. People are born homosexual; they don't choose it. There have always been and always will be homosexuals: people like you need to accept that. You don't need to celebrate it, but 10% of the entire human population is born homosexual, to not accept that and them, to consider it an illness, only demonstrates your own mental illness, not theirs. Homosexuality doesn't hurt heterosexuals; it has no effect on your own life and existence at all. To obsess over it only illustrates your own fears and weaknesses, not anyone elses.
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Never known anyone to get cancer from having sex, you tool.

Michael Douglas......

And he was speaking metaphorically.
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Little Nipper: you are a sad, sad little person. And, your analogy is falacious. Cancer kills people. Homosexuality does not. People are born homosexual; they don't choose it. There have always been and always will be homosexuals: people like you need to accept that. You don't need to celebrate it, but 10% of the entire human population is born homosexual, to not accept that and them, to consider it an illness, only demonstrates your own mental illness, not theirs. Homosexuality doesn't hurt heterosexuals; it has no effect on your own life and existence at all. To obsess over it only illustrates your own fears and weaknesses, not anyone elses.

Actually, his analogy seems to be from a biological (and spiritual) p.o.v. rather than the literal.

But to key in on your idea that there is no literal deadly correlation, that would be categorically false.

Thirty to forty percent of teenaged homosexuals have attempted suicides:

Suicide among LGBT youth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gay, lesbian and bisexual teens are five times more likely to commit suicide than their heterosexual counterparts.....

Suicide is the third leading cause of death among young adults from ages 15 to 24, and lesbian, gay and bisexual teens (LGB) youth are more likely to attempt suicide, according to the researchers......

The study researchers led by Mark Hatzenbuehler of Columbia University polled more than 30,000 11th graders in different counties in Oregon. Results showed that about 20 percent of LGB teens attempted suicide in the 12 months before the survey, while only about 4 percent of heterosexual teens had.

Homosexual Teen Suicide Rates Raised in Bad Environments | Lesbian, Gay & Bisexual (LGB) Mental Health | LiveScience
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Never known anyone to get cancer from having sex, you tool.

Michael Douglas......

And he was speaking metaphorically.

Actually, Michael Douglas said that he'd gotten throat cancer from having oral sex with WOMEN.

The OP was inferring that you could get cancer from having same sex oral sex.

Sorry.............................but using Michael Douglas in this thread, on this subject is a very poor way to go.

Michael Douglas got cancer (or so he claims) from heterosexual oral sex.

Does that mean we have to run commercials on heterosexual oral sex like we do for cigarettes?

(Shit..................that almost rhymed).
 
Homosexuality is a cancer on any society that condones it's practice and lifestyle.

And historically it's a sign of a culture/nation that is in decline and in a death spiral .. :doubt:
 
Last edited:
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Never known anyone to get cancer from having sex, you tool.

I beg to differ, Noomi. Not that I am agreeing with LittleNipper in any way, but cancer can be caused by HPV, which is sexually transmitted:


Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted disease that can cause genital warts or present itself without symptoms. If left untreated, it can also cause cancers of the cervix, anus, penis, vulva, vagina — and head and neck cancers.

Read more: Michael Douglas Is Right: Oral Sex Can Really Cause Throat Cancer | TIME.com

Its not specifically related to homosexual sex, though.
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Little Nipper: you are a sad, sad little person. And, your analogy is falacious. Cancer kills people. Homosexuality does not. People are born homosexual; they don't choose it. There have always been and always will be homosexuals: people like you need to accept that. You don't need to celebrate it, but 10% of the entire human population is born homosexual, to not accept that and them, to consider it an illness, only demonstrates your own mental illness, not theirs. Homosexuality doesn't hurt heterosexuals; it has no effect on your own life and existence at all. To obsess over it only illustrates your own fears and weaknesses, not anyone elses.

Actually, his analogy seems to be from a biological (and spiritual) p.o.v. rather than the literal.

But to key in on your idea that there is no literal deadly correlation, that would be categorically false.

Thirty to forty percent of teenaged homosexuals have attempted suicides:
Suicide among LGBT youth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gay, lesbian and bisexual teens are five times more likely to commit suicide than their heterosexual counterparts.....

Suicide is the third leading cause of death among young adults from ages 15 to 24, and lesbian, gay and bisexual teens (LGB) youth are more likely to attempt suicide, according to the researchers......

The study researchers led by Mark Hatzenbuehler of Columbia University polled more than 30,000 11th graders in different counties in Oregon. Results showed that about 20 percent of LGB teens attempted suicide in the 12 months before the survey, while only about 4 percent of heterosexual teens had.

Homosexual Teen Suicide Rates Raised in Bad Environments | Lesbian, Gay & Bisexual (LGB) Mental Health | LiveScience

It isn't homosexuality that is killing teenagers; it is the fact that society does not accept them that is killing them. My goodness, that should seem extremely obvious. Homosexuality does not kill anyone; cancer does. Society's negative attitude toward homosexuality is what causes people to commit suicide. :sad:
 
Homo's are just laughable. But, it's all good. If a guy wants to marry a chicken, that's fine with me. It's just when they want the benefits that come with marriage for marrying a chicken, is when I have to raise..

:bsflag:
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Never known anyone to get cancer from having sex, you tool.
It is called bacterial and viral infection. Same things that have been linked to warts and ulcers.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...

Never known anyone to get cancer from having sex, you tool.
It is called bacterial and viral infection. Same things that have been linked to warts and ulcers.

And AIDS

-Geaux
 
Homosexuality is like cancer. One may be born with it, acquire it, or have a propensity for it; however, that is not a reason to celebrate its occurrence. Society seeks to cure cancer and yet cancer is a natural phenomenon. Society as a whole, once wanted to cure homosexual behavior patterns. That society has since become very complacent but has not proven that homosexual behavior is good for society. Now the cancer is spreading to the point that homosexual behavior is beginning to be considered biologically correct. If it were biologically correct, it would be productive. And such behavior is nonproductive. In fact, it is harmful. Oral cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, anal rupture, blindness, have been linked to homosexual style encounters --- none of which produce a baby. So what exactly is the homosexual doing for society in terms of his sexual activity?

Perhaps the answer is that if everyone only engaged in homosexual behavior, then the population would go down. But then so with cancer. If everyone with cancer was withheld treatment, the population would also drop accordingly...
Tell me; are you Muslim because I understand it's Muslims who hate gays?
I don't hate Homosexuals. But one cannot treat and help those that accept lies as truth, and reap rewards and praise for behavior with deserves none. No, I am a Christian. All lifestyles are not equal.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom