Holocaust deniers

[Urbanguerrilla]

As usual, you make no sense. Nazi Germany was infamous for it anti-Semitism. How to you fool tens of millions of Jew haters that their country was committing genocide against the very people they loathed if it didn't really happen? If it didn't happen, as a country, they would have flat out rejected the Jews' accounts. They would never have banned Holocaust-denial because it would not have happened. You're making shit up out of whole cloth to justify your hallucinations and you don't even care how crazy it makes you sound. And when were books burned after the war? And what about Hans Frank, who wrote about annihilating the Jews in his journals? He was just making that up too, huh?

Poland, Russia and many other countries were Jew haters at the time - the Dreyfus affair happened in France.

If you ban holocaust revisionism and burn revisionist books and make it a crime punishable by 5 years in prison (the same as for manslaughter) then people tend to be wary of 'going there'.

As a result of the tightening of criminal law, the spring of
1995 saw a wave of book destruction in Germany, in which history
books of revisionist nature as well as political books went the
way of the state shredder.

The fact that books with historical or political content can be destroyed
in Germany on the orders of a court is largely unknown. This may
be due to the fact that such campaigns of book destruction are
not generally publicized - in other words, they are carried out
behind the public's back. Since book confiscations are
accompanied by corresponding criminal proceedings against all
persons involved in the production, import and/or distribution
of forbidden literature - i.e., against authors, editors,
publishers, booksellers, printers, and multiple-copy purchasers,
even in cases where the books were produced, distributed or
bought at a time when they were not yet banned - the list of
persons being prosecuted for "thought crimes" in Germany is
growing at an alarming rate. These account for a considerable
portion of those cases which have led to the recent enormous
increase in the category of alleged "right-wing crimes" in
Germany. Because censorship, book burning, and the persecution
of people for "propaganda offenses" in Germany is such an
important, but hardly ever discussed topic, we have included a
more detailed study about that by Anton Mägerle in Appendix 3
of this handbook.
Dissecting the Holocaust Ernst Gauss The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews

 

[Urbanguerrilla]

The burden of proof is always entirely on the one's trying to overturn established conventional history. I wonder why you imagine you're different.

And revisionists have proven it beyond doubt.

Aren't you embarrassed to tell obviously stupid lies all the time?

You should certainly be embarrassed to be unable to discuss an issue without resorting to
mere childish insults all the time

 

[Urbanguerrilla]

You're the biggest troll here (besides Sunni Man), so please. You're not fooling anyone except brainwashed sheep like Urbanguerilla.
Urban has been presented with plenty of evidence yet he still denies certain events.
Now go back to the Conspiracy Theory forum where you belong .
And for fucks sake, learn how to spell. You've made the same mistake with 'your' like 100 times. It's 'you're'

What evidence?

 

[Faun]

As usual, you make no sense. Nazi Germany was infamous for it anti-Semitism. How to you fool tens of millions of Jew haters that their country was committing genocide against the very people they loathed if it didn't really happen? If it didn't happen, as a country, they would have flat out rejected the Jews' accounts. They would never have banned Holocaust-denial because it would not have happened. You're making shit up out of whole cloth to justify your hallucinations and you don't even care how crazy it makes you sound. And when were books burned after the war? And what about Hans Frank, who wrote about annihilating the Jews in his journals? He was just making that up too, huh?

Poland, Russia and many other countries were Jew haters at the time - the Dreyfus affair happened in France.

If you ban holocaust revisionism and burn revisionist books and make it a crime punishable by 5 years in prison (the same as for manslaughter) then people tend to be wary of 'going there'.

As a result of the tightening of criminal law, the spring of
1995 saw a wave of book destruction in Germany, in which history
books of revisionist nature as well as political books went the
way of the state shredder.

The fact that books with historical or political content can be destroyed
in Germany on the orders of a court is largely unknown. This may
be due to the fact that such campaigns of book destruction are
not generally publicized - in other words, they are carried out
behind the public's back. Since book confiscations are
accompanied by corresponding criminal proceedings against all
persons involved in the production, import and/or distribution
of forbidden literature - i.e., against authors, editors,
publishers, booksellers, printers, and multiple-copy purchasers,
even in cases where the books were produced, distributed or
bought at a time when they were not yet banned - the list of
persons being prosecuted for "thought crimes" in Germany is
growing at an alarming rate. These account for a considerable
portion of those cases which have led to the recent enormous
increase in the category of alleged "right-wing crimes" in
Germany. Because censorship, book burning, and the persecution
of people for "propaganda offenses" in Germany is such an
important, but hardly ever discussed topic, we have included a
more detailed study about that by Anton Mägerle in Appendix 3
of this handbook.
Dissecting the Holocaust Ernst Gauss The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews

So books are being "secretly burned" yet you can link to them and they're available on amazon.com?

Still, I see no lucid answer of how a country of Jew-haters allows itself to be victimized by the very people it hates into accepting culpability over one of the most horrific crimes in history had they not actually committed it.

And again, what about Hans Frank? He wrote about annihilating Jews in his journals. He was convicted at Nuremberg largely on his own writings. Why would he write about that if it didn't actually occur.

Deniers deny reality.

 

[Sunni Man]

If the official story of the so called Holocaust is such an air tight, perfect, 100% solid case, with no flaws.

Then why the need for Holocaust denial laws in several countries? Shouldn't the rock solid official Holocaust story be able to stand on it's own merits?

Or is there something the governments want to hide from the public?? ....


.

 

[Faun]

If the official story of the so called Holocaust is such an air tight, perfect, 100% solid case, with no flaws.

Then why the need for Holocaust denial laws in several countries? Shouldn't the rock solid official Holocaust story be able to stand on it's own merits?

Or is there something the governments want to hide from the public?? ....


.

Maybe because it was such an evil atrocity, they didn't want idiots to have an opportunity to rewrite history in an attempt erase it from the public conscious? As far as rock solid evidence being available as a tool to squash such protests, there are always disbelievers in almost any event, no matter what the evidence is. Just look at 9.11 ... there are still imbeciles claiming there were no planes involved, despite the evidence of planes.

Evidence means nothing to deniers, regardless of what they're denying. As 9.11 proves, there is no evidence rock solid enough that deniers can't try to question.

 

[Discombobulated]

You're the biggest troll here (besides Sunni Man), so please. You're not fooling anyone except brainwashed sheep like Urbanguerilla.
Urban has been presented with plenty of evidence yet he still denies certain events.
Now go back to the Conspiracy Theory forum where you belong .
And for fucks sake, learn how to spell. You've made the same mistake with 'your' like 100 times. It's 'you're'

What evidence?

The evidence of historical record......as opposed to what you pull from your ass.

 

[irosie91]

If the official story of the so called Holocaust is such an air tight, perfect, 100% solid case, with no flaws.

Then why the need for Holocaust denial laws in several countries? Shouldn't the rock solid official Holocaust story be able to stand on it's own merits?

Or is there something the governments want to hide from the public?? ....

LOL sunni you offer an interesting comment regarding the stinking filth of shariah law------under the stinking filth of shariah law---"questioning" the lump of shit Koran-----in any way is a CAPITAL CRIME----even correctly stating that the NABI KANZEER was a rapist pig is a capital crime----

WHY??? does not the filth of the Koran and the lump rapist pig muhummad STAND ON THEIR OWN????

.

 

[Urbanguerrilla]

What evidence?

The evidence of historical record......as opposed to what you pull from your ass.

You have no evidence do you, thats why you spend all your time insulting other posters...isn't it?

 

[Discombobulated]

What evidence?

The evidence of historical record......as opposed to what you pull from your ass.

You have no evidence do you, thats why you spend all your time insulting other posters...isn't it?

You're not even smart enough to know when you've been insulted.

 

[Urbanguerrilla]

As usual, you make no sense. Nazi Germany was infamous for it anti-Semitism. How to you fool tens of millions of Jew haters that their country was committing genocide against the very people they loathed if it didn't really happen? If it didn't happen, as a country, they would have flat out rejected the Jews' accounts. They would never have banned Holocaust-denial because it would not have happened. You're making shit up out of whole cloth to justify your hallucinations and you don't even care how crazy it makes you sound. And when were books burned after the war? And what about Hans Frank, who wrote about annihilating the Jews in his journals? He was just making that up too, huh?

Poland, Russia and many other countries were Jew haters at the time - the Dreyfus affair happened in France.

If you ban holocaust revisionism and burn revisionist books and make it a crime punishable by 5 years in prison (the same as for manslaughter) then people tend to be wary of 'going there'.

As a result of the tightening of criminal law, the spring of
1995 saw a wave of book destruction in Germany, in which history
books of revisionist nature as well as political books went the
way of the state shredder.

The fact that books with historical or political content can be destroyed
in Germany on the orders of a court is largely unknown. This may
be due to the fact that such campaigns of book destruction are
not generally publicized - in other words, they are carried out
behind the public's back. Since book confiscations are
accompanied by corresponding criminal proceedings against all
persons involved in the production, import and/or distribution
of forbidden literature - i.e., against authors, editors,
publishers, booksellers, printers, and multiple-copy purchasers,
even in cases where the books were produced, distributed or
bought at a time when they were not yet banned - the list of
persons being prosecuted for "thought crimes" in Germany is
growing at an alarming rate. These account for a considerable
portion of those cases which have led to the recent enormous
increase in the category of alleged "right-wing crimes" in
Germany. Because censorship, book burning, and the persecution
of people for "propaganda offenses" in Germany is such an
important, but hardly ever discussed topic, we have included a
more detailed study about that by Anton Mägerle in Appendix 3
of this handbook.
Dissecting the Holocaust Ernst Gauss The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews

So books are being "secretly burned" yet you can link to them and they're available on amazon.com?

Still, I see no lucid answer of how a country of Jew-haters allows itself to be victimized by the very people it hates into accepting culpability over one of the most horrific crimes in history had they not actually committed it.

And again, what about Hans Frank? He wrote about annihilating Jews in his journals. He was convicted at Nuremberg largely on his own writings. Why would he write about that if it didn't actually occur.

Deniers deny reality.

Yes the German government destroy books they disagree with just as the Nazis did.

• Publications violating laws (that restrict freedom of speech in general) can be censored; their authors can be penalised. Such restrictions are Volksverhetzung, slander and libel(which are in Germany Beleidigung, Verleumdung and Üble Nachrede). Especially Üble Nachrede (defamatory statement) scarcely causes censorship. Üble Nachrede(Defamatory statement) means violating personal rights by spreading gossip/news which are neither evidentially true or false.

Membership in a Nazi party, incitement of hatred against a segment of the population (Volksverhetzung) and Holocaust denial, are illegal in Germany. Publishing, television, public correspondence (including lectures), and music are censored accordingly, with legal consequences that may include jail time.

Censorship in Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Urbanguerrilla]

"You're not even smart enough to know when you've been insulted."

So you have nothing, ok got it

 

[Delta4Embassy]

If the official story of the so called Holocaust is such an air tight, perfect, 100% solid case, with no flaws.

Then why the need for Holocaust denial laws in several countries? Shouldn't the rock solid official Holocaust story be able to stand on it's own merits?

Or is there something the governments want to hide from the public?? ....


.

(throws raw strips of bacon at you) Have at you!

 

[Discombobulated]

"You're not even smart enough to know when you've been insulted."

So you have nothing, ok got it

You could deny the existence of the sun and the moon and you would be no more stupid and wrong than you were already.

 

[toastman]

What evidence?

The evidence of historical record......as opposed to what you pull from your ass.

You have no evidence do you, thats why you spend all your time insulting other posters...isn't it?

There is plenty of evidence that has been posted many times. The issue is that you chose to ignore it .

 

[Sunni Man]

There is plenty of evidence that has been posted many times. The issue is that you chose to ignore it .

So called evidence from zionist sites isn't really evidence.........it's just juden propaganda. .....


.

 

[Discombobulated]

There is plenty of evidence that has been posted many times. The issue is that you chose to ignore it .

So called evidence from zionist sites isn't really evidence.........it's just juden propaganda. .....


.

It's the kind of thinking that could be just as easily applied to people like you.

 

[Faun]

As usual, you make no sense. Nazi Germany was infamous for it anti-Semitism. How to you fool tens of millions of Jew haters that their country was committing genocide against the very people they loathed if it didn't really happen? If it didn't happen, as a country, they would have flat out rejected the Jews' accounts. They would never have banned Holocaust-denial because it would not have happened. You're making shit up out of whole cloth to justify your hallucinations and you don't even care how crazy it makes you sound. And when were books burned after the war? And what about Hans Frank, who wrote about annihilating the Jews in his journals? He was just making that up too, huh?

Poland, Russia and many other countries were Jew haters at the time - the Dreyfus affair happened in France.

If you ban holocaust revisionism and burn revisionist books and make it a crime punishable by 5 years in prison (the same as for manslaughter) then people tend to be wary of 'going there'.

As a result of the tightening of criminal law, the spring of
1995 saw a wave of book destruction in Germany, in which history
books of revisionist nature as well as political books went the
way of the state shredder.

The fact that books with historical or political content can be destroyed
in Germany on the orders of a court is largely unknown. This may
be due to the fact that such campaigns of book destruction are
not generally publicized - in other words, they are carried out
behind the public's back. Since book confiscations are
accompanied by corresponding criminal proceedings against all
persons involved in the production, import and/or distribution
of forbidden literature - i.e., against authors, editors,
publishers, booksellers, printers, and multiple-copy purchasers,
even in cases where the books were produced, distributed or
bought at a time when they were not yet banned - the list of
persons being prosecuted for "thought crimes" in Germany is
growing at an alarming rate. These account for a considerable
portion of those cases which have led to the recent enormous
increase in the category of alleged "right-wing crimes" in
Germany. Because censorship, book burning, and the persecution
of people for "propaganda offenses" in Germany is such an
important, but hardly ever discussed topic, we have included a
more detailed study about that by Anton Mägerle in Appendix 3
of this handbook.
Dissecting the Holocaust Ernst Gauss The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews

So books are being "secretly burned" yet you can link to them and they're available on amazon.com?

Still, I see no lucid answer of how a country of Jew-haters allows itself to be victimized by the very people it hates into accepting culpability over one of the most horrific crimes in history had they not actually committed it.

And again, what about Hans Frank? He wrote about annihilating Jews in his journals. He was convicted at Nuremberg largely on his own writings. Why would he write about that if it didn't actually occur.

Deniers deny reality.

Yes the German government destroy books they disagree with just as the Nazis did.

• Publications violating laws (that restrict freedom of speech in general) can be censored; their authors can be penalised. Such restrictions are Volksverhetzung, slander and libel(which are in Germany Beleidigung, Verleumdung and Üble Nachrede). Especially Üble Nachrede (defamatory statement) scarcely causes censorship. Üble Nachrede(Defamatory statement) means violating personal rights by spreading gossip/news which are neither evidentially true or false.

Membership in a Nazi party, incitement of hatred against a segment of the population (Volksverhetzung) and Holocaust denial, are illegal in Germany. Publishing, television, public correspondence (including lectures), and music are censored accordingly, with legal consequences that may include jail time.

Censorship in Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

I see nothing in there about "burning." And why did you ignore the rest of my post?

 

[toastman]

There is plenty of evidence that has been posted many times. The issue is that you chose to ignore it .

So called evidence from zionist sites isn't really evidence.........it's just juden propaganda. .....


.

You are a rotten evil human being. And I really TRULY do mean that. It's really sad to know that there are people out there like you with so much hate.

 

[irosie91]

There is plenty of evidence that has been posted many times. The issue is that you chose to ignore it .

So called evidence from zionist sites isn't really evidence.........it's just juden propaganda. .....


.

You are a rotten evil human being. And I really TRULY do mean that. It's really sad to know that there are people out there like you with so much hate.

Its not his fault----it's his religion----he has to be that way or they will not let him into the mosque