Obama And The Steele Dossier

[PoliticalChic]

Trump Threatens to Revoke Licenses of Broadcast Networks

Trump's threat to revoke broadcast licenses isn’t idle bluster anymore—especially as his allies at the FCC openly pressure networks to bend toward MAGA.

www.mediaite.com

Can you quote where he said he would do that?

No?

Why not?



Where is your explanation for voting to end free speech?

 

[Marener]

Can you quote where he said he would do that?

No?

Why not?



Where is your explanation for voting to end free speech?

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114922310106523572

 

[PoliticalChic]

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114922310106523572

So there is no such quote where he said he will remove licenses?


Is English your first language?


Where is your explanation for voting to end free speech? Don't run away....answer the question.

 

[Marener]

So there is no such quote where he said he will remove licenses?

Does his desire to remove licenses demonstrate his adherence to the principles of the first amendment?

 

[PoliticalChic]

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114922310106523572

Looks like I slapped you around and made you run and hide.


Happens a lot with Democrats.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Does his desire to remove licenses demonstrate his adherence to the principles of the first amendment?

But he simply said truth would be better from your sort.


Now, about your voting against free speech and the Constitution........explain it.




The Constituion is America.

The Democrats dispute it.


The contemporary Right is a supporter of religion, while the left abjors both the Constitution and religion.

What possible justification could there be for the Democrats silencing those who speak out against evil?????

Unless evil is what the Democrats represent.




Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:
. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????

“The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



The contrast is startlingly clear: the Right supports both religion and the Constitution.

"My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the Constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the Glory of God!"
Trump, SOTU 2020

 

[Marener]

But he simply said truth would be better from your sort.

I wasn’t aware Trump made himself the arbiter of truth? Given his lack of adherence to the truth, that’s a pretty dodgy position for him to take on.

 

[marvin martian]

This nonsense is yet another desperate attempt to divert the focus on the sexual abuser's intimate relationship with the sex trafficker of miners.

It won'r work.

Bolton dismisses Gabbard’s Obama allegations:
‘She’s imagined evidence that doesn’t exist’
​

“She’s strung together a series of things that aren’t necessarily related, she’s exaggerated what actual congressional reports have said, she’s imagined evidence that doesn’t exist,” Bolton, a foreign policy hawk, said during his Friday appearance on NewsNation’s “On Balance.” “So, if anybody really gets into it, it collapses pretty quickly, but as a campaign to save her job, I think it actually worked out pretty successfully for her.” ​

John Bolton?? LOL

 

[schmidlap]

John Bolton?? LOL

As with the convicted criminal's whining that Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and others are criminals, no legal charges will be concocted against Barack Obama.

Such baseless, hysterical tantrums are calculated to distract the MAGA swarm from scandals like Trump/Epstein.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I wasn’t aware Trump made himself the arbiter of truth? Given his lack of adherence to the truth, that’s a pretty dodgy position for him to take on.

And that is what is wrong with your sort......never raised to honor truth.


1 There are those of us who have been brought up correctly, with the right principles and knowledge of right and wrong







2. Some of us may not have had that start, and been misled by sophistry, but finally saw through it and moved in the right direction.







3. I see that you belong to neither of those categories. But you are not alone: Around 22% of Americans identify as strong Democrats, meaning they are highly likely to consistently vote for Democratic candidates, no matter how many lies and hoaxes are revealed.



You will vote for whatever the party tells you to, and never confront the evil that is the Democrat Party.


Why won't you denounce the restrictions on free speech?

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[Marener]

And that is what is wrong with your sort......never raised to honor truth.

This is a childish reply.

Trump isn’t truthful and his threats against free speech have nothing to do with truth and everything to do with his desire to control what people say.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is a childish reply.

Trump isn’t truthful and his threats against free speech have nothing to do with truth and everything to do with his desire to control what people say.

You brought up free speech, you dunce.


How do you vote for the anti-free speech party?????


\
The Constituion is America.

The Democrats dispute it.


The contemporary Right is a supporter of religion, while the left abjors both the Constitution and religion.

What possible justification could there be for the Democrats silencing those who speak out against evil?????

Unless evil is what the Democrats represent.




Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:
. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????

“The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



The contrast is startlingly clear: the Right supports both religion and the Constitution.

"My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the Constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the Glory of God!"
Trump, SOTU 2020

 

[Marener]

Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:

It doesn’t forbid free speech, silly.

It just says that you can’t endorse candidates if you want special treatment to be tax exempt.

No one says the church has to be tax exempt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It doesn’t forbid free speech, silly.

It just says that you can’t endorse candidates if you want special treatment to be tax exempt.

No one says the church has to be tax exempt.

You imbecile......that's what free speech is......the right to say whatever you wishl


AI Overview

Free speech, also known as freedom of expression, is the right to express opinions and ideas without government censorship or interference. It's a fundamental principle, particularly in democratic societies, that allows individuals to share their thoughts and beliefs without fear of punishment. While free speech is generally protected, it's not absolute and has certain limitations to prevent harm or disruption.



You're so dumb you must be a Democrat


And you are a buffoon who has never read the Constitution


AI Overview



In the United States, churches are generally exempt from paying federal income taxes, and often state and local taxes as well, for several reasons:

• First Amendment and Separation of Church and State: The principle of separation of church and state, derived from the First Amendment, is a cornerstone of this exemption. Taxing religious institutions is viewed as a potential way for the government to interfere with or control religious practices, thus violating the establishment clause and free exercise clause.

 

[Marener]

You imbecile......that's what free speech is......the right to say whatever you wishl

They can say whatever they wish. They just have to pay taxes.

I have to pay taxes, does that mean I don’t have free speech? Of course not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They can say whatever they wish. They just have to pay taxes.

I have to pay taxes, does that mean I don’t have free speech? Of course not.

So you aren't an American, and don't honor the Constitution?
And you vote for the party that would ban free speech.

That is just what I've been writing.

 

[Marener]

So you aren't an American, and don't honor the Constitution?

More than Trump does.

It's obviously silly to claim that free speech means you don't have to pay taxes.

 

[BlindBoo]

SOP

 

[PoliticalChic]

More than Trump does.

It's obviously silly to claim that free speech means you don't have to pay taxes.

This is the reason it is important for you to post....so that potential Democrat voters can see me wipe up the floor with you, and view what passes for intelligence from your sort.