Hillary Clinton wants Supreme Court ethics

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2017
36,124
46,190
2,915
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she believes there should be a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices and that it should be enforced.
“Why should they be the only institution in the United States without a code of ethics that is enforceable? … And they have a lifetime appointment,” Clinton said on the panel. “So, of course, there should be ethical standards, and they should carry some weight."


Comment:
Hillary Clinton one of the most corrupt politicians in American history.
And she has gotten away with it.
Her opinion on ethics is laughable.
 
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she believes there should be a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices and that it should be enforced.
“Why should they be the only institution in the United States without a code of ethics that is enforceable? … And they have a lifetime appointment,” Clinton said on the panel. “So, of course, there should be ethical standards, and they should carry some weight."


Comment:
Hillary Clinton one of the most corrupt politicians in American history.
And she has gotten away with it.
Her opinion on ethics is laughable.


To hilary......

 
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she believes there should be a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices and that it should be enforced.
“Why should they be the only institution in the United States without a code of ethics that is enforceable? … And they have a lifetime appointment,” Clinton said on the panel. “So, of course, there should be ethical standards, and they should carry some weight."


Comment:
Hillary Clinton one of the most corrupt politicians in American history.
And she has gotten away with it.
Her opinion on ethics is laughable.

The 'balls' on this criminal, treasonous, unethical, immoral, scheming, deplorable bitch...
Just amazing - her wanting 'ethics'...
 
This is an incredibly lame response. Ethic rules would cover ALL justices. What is wrong with you to not understand this?
they do. This is about the demafasict attacking…once again Thomas…for nothing…we know this because they were silent about Justices they like sitting and voting on cases of companies thst paid them directly over three million dollars

your prejudice is open and obvious
 
Last edited:
I would personally like to see every federal politician fitted with a shock collar that shocks the shit out of them every time they lie...not enough to seriously hurt them but strong enough to make them jump / yelp.

If Hillary had been fitted with one early on even a mild charge would have killed her by now from constantly shocking her non-stop, 24/7.
 
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she believes there should be a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices and that it should be enforced.
“Why should they be the only institution in the United States without a code of ethics that is enforceable? … And they have a lifetime appointment,” Clinton said on the panel. “So, of course, there should be ethical standards, and they should carry some weight."


Comment:
Hillary Clinton one of the most corrupt politicians in American history.
And she has gotten away with it.
Her opinion on ethics is laughable.
I see you do not want politicians or judges in the federal govt. to be investigated for corruption.
 
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she believes there should be a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices and that it should be enforced.
“Why should they be the only institution in the United States without a code of ethics that is enforceable? … And they have a lifetime appointment,” Clinton said on the panel. “So, of course, there should be ethical standards, and they should carry some weight."


Comment:
Hillary Clinton one of the most corrupt politicians in American history.
And she has gotten away with it.
Her opinion on ethics is laughable.
Hypocritical bitch. What does SHE know about “ethics?”
 
Funny how in the middle of the Democrats' manufactured issues involving 2 Conservative Justices a real scandal involving Soto-Mayor blows up in their faces...

...and《crickets from the Democrats & MSM.

:popcorn:
I see you think it is ok since you do not speak out against it.
 
Yes it's hypocritical but it's something everyone should want.
Not necessarily. Aside from Shrillary’s glaring hypocrisy, the notion has some surface level appeal. But yet again the devil would be in the details.

Who decides what constitutes an ethical violation? On what basis? Then how do they determine when it’s supposedly been violated? And if some “official [?]” decides that a Justice has violated an ethical rule, what would be the penalty? How is an appeal taken? To which judicial body would it go? Wouldn’t the other Justices theoretically then be the ones to make the final call? Or would we get more politically motivated Congressional impeachment shitshows to get the Justice off the bench?
 

Forum List

Back
Top