With rules of conduct.Not necessarily. Aside from Shrillary’s glaring hypocrisy, the notion has some surface level appeal. But yet again the devil would be in the details.
Who decides what constitutes an ethical violation? On what basis? Then how do they determine when it’s supposedly been violated? And if some “official [?]” decides that a Justice has violated an ethical rule, what would be the penalty? How is an appeal taken? To which judicial body would it go? Wouldn’t the other Justices theoretically then be the ones to make the final call? Or would we get more politically motivated Congressional impeachment shitshows to get the Justice off the bench?