Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails

[Doc7505]

Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails​

Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails

Amid the chaos and anarchy across blue-city America that exclusively possessed public attention for the last couple of weeks, it was not hard to miss any other bit of news — especially if that news has not appeared or been even briefly mentione...

www.americanthinker.com

14 Jun 2020 ~~ By Veronika Kyrylenko
Amid the chaos and anarchy across blue-city America that exclusively possessed public attention for the last couple of weeks, it was not hard to miss any other bit of news — especially if that news has not appeared or been even briefly mentioned by any major mainstream media outlet. Take for example the news of Hillary Clinton, who lost her appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on June 2, where she tried to avoid testifying under oath about her emails and the Benghazi case.
The hearing in the D.C. Circuit came in the case Judicial Watch v. Clinton, a public records case involving a request for State Department documents and communication about the 2012 terror attack at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya. U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the attack.
The case also involves Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state. Judicial Watch, a conservative activist watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials, uncovered another 756 pages of emails the FBI was able to retrieve that were part of Hillary Clinton's unsecured server revealing communications between some prominent Washington figures and classified emails sent by former prime minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair. The emails were part of the batch "Clinton tried to delete or destroy," Judicial Watch stated in its press release. It showed that Clinton had asked Blair to continue using her private email after her confirmation and also revealed that Blair was sending classified information on her unsecured server. Clinton had been "extremely careless" in her handling of classified information, as ex–FBI director James Comey carefully and rather mildly concluded in July 2016,
~~Snip~~
And now, despite all the effort to avoid testimony, Madam Secretary will have to answer questions from Judicial Watch, as the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which will now be heard on September 9. Stock up on your popcorn, America.

Comment:
As the headline alludes, Hillary has no appeal, so nobody cares if she goes to prison.
Obviously, Congress should have demanded this information from Hillary when they investigated Benghazi?
Undoubtedly Hillary will continue to repeat, "I do not recall" as her response... We will also here a lot of “I don’t remember”, “That didn’t happen”, “That’s a lie” and “on the advice of council, I will invoke the fifth amendment”.
Perhaps they will 'refresh' her memory for testimony she previously gave while not under oath. This time she faces charges of perjury if caught lying. It worked on General Flynn.
Will she call Carlos Danger to testify as a "character" witness. Maybe he can bring along that computer file "insurance" to add to the court. I know the FBI already determined by an examination of 3,000 emails that there was nothing of importance found in "insurance," but let us all see the 60,000 remaining emails that had the NYPD so interested.

 

[Oddball]

She'll lie out her ass anyway, and be allowed to get away with it.

 

[Hossfly]

She'll lie out her ass anyway, and be allowed to get away with it.

They'll all kiss her feet and fight one another to eat her shit.

 

[Kilroy2]

Yet the same justice department is endorsing Flynns petition to shut down his prosecution. Going with full support of Flynn. Yet when Clinton filed similar petition to block deposition that a judge ordered at the request of a conservative group called Judicial Watch. The judge asked the justice department to speak with him on their silence on the Clinton matter. They declined.

So after the FBI declined , justice department decline, Senate had a hearing on the matter for 3 years and here we are with Judicial Watch who wants to depose Clinton. For what purposes as they are not a government judicial body but simply looking for dirt.

So while they sit and watch the development in the Clinton Saga round 10, they have done everything in their power to dismantle the Flynn judgment which was based on his admitting he lied and did meet with the Russian guy. The hypocrisy in the Judicial department has reached new levels.

Still this is a case of freedom of information (FOI) and will not lead to any prosecution. Just ammo for those who want it.

 

[Oddball]

Yet the same justice department is endorsing Flynns petition to shut down his prosecution. Going with full support of Flynn. Yet when Clinton filed similar petition to block deposition that a judge ordered at the request of a conservative group called Judicial Watch. The judge asked the justice department to speak with him on their silence on the Clinton matter. They declined.

So after the FBI declined , justice department decline, Senate had a hearing on the matter for 3 years and here we are with Judicial Watch who wants to depose Clinton. For what purposes as they are not a government judicial body but simply looking for dirt.

So while they sit and watch the development in the Clinton Saga round 10, they have done everything in their power to dismantle the Flynn judgment which was based on his admitting he lied and did meet with the Russian guy. The hypocrisy in the Judicial department has reached new levels.

There's no evidence against Flynn, and entire mountain range of it against Hildabeest.

Nice try.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails​

Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails

Amid the chaos and anarchy across blue-city America that exclusively possessed public attention for the last couple of weeks, it was not hard to miss any other bit of news — especially if that news has not appeared or been even briefly mentione...

www.americanthinker.com

14 Jun 2020 ~~ By Veronika Kyrylenko
Amid the chaos and anarchy across blue-city America that exclusively possessed public attention for the last couple of weeks, it was not hard to miss any other bit of news — especially if that news has not appeared or been even briefly mentioned by any major mainstream media outlet. Take for example the news of Hillary Clinton, who lost her appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on June 2, where she tried to avoid testifying under oath about her emails and the Benghazi case.
The hearing in the D.C. Circuit came in the case Judicial Watch v. Clinton, a public records case involving a request for State Department documents and communication about the 2012 terror attack at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya. U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the attack.
The case also involves Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state. Judicial Watch, a conservative activist watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials, uncovered another 756 pages of emails the FBI was able to retrieve that were part of Hillary Clinton's unsecured server revealing communications between some prominent Washington figures and classified emails sent by former prime minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair. The emails were part of the batch "Clinton tried to delete or destroy," Judicial Watch stated in its press release. It showed that Clinton had asked Blair to continue using her private email after her confirmation and also revealed that Blair was sending classified information on her unsecured server. Clinton had been "extremely careless" in her handling of classified information, as ex–FBI director James Comey carefully and rather mildly concluded in July 2016,
~~Snip~~
And now, despite all the effort to avoid testimony, Madam Secretary will have to answer questions from Judicial Watch, as the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which will now be heard on September 9. Stock up on your popcorn, America.

Comment:
As the headline alludes, Hillary has no appeal, so nobody cares if she goes to prison.
Obviously, Congress should have demanded this information from Hillary when they investigated Benghazi?
Undoubtedly Hillary will continue to repeat, "I do not recall" as her response... We will also here a lot of “I don’t remember”, “That didn’t happen”, “That’s a lie” and “on the advice of council, I will invoke the fifth amendment”.
Perhaps they will 'refresh' her memory for testimony she previously gave while not under oath. This time she faces charges of perjury if caught lying. It worked on General Flynn.
Will she call Carlos Danger to testify as a "character" witness. Maybe he can bring along that computer file "insurance" to add to the court. I know the FBI already determined by an examination of 3,000 emails that there was nothing of importance found in "insurance," but let us all see the 60,000 remaining emails that had the NYPD so interested.

She will plead the fifth, say i cant recall , or lie per usual.