Hillary Clinton is a CHEATER & YOU are going to endorse that by voting for her.

[Coyote]

Clinton sucks. Trump sucks more. We can survive 4 yrs of Clinton. I have my doubts about 4 years of Trump. Keeping him out is more important.

I suspect there are ardent and blind supporters of both - but I think the majority of us are voting for the most paltable of the shit-sandwitch choice we're faced with.

It's funny how you think that agreeing with your positions makes someone less scummy somehow

The quality of scummyness is multi-dimensional and issues (at least for me) play only a part in the overall Scum Rating.

How does it work for you? Does agreeing with The Donald make him less scummy than The Hillary?

Nope, they're both scummy, which is why I'm not voting for either of them. It's interesting to me that even though you know that, you actually like highlighting the black and white world you live in, while at the same time you criticize Republicans for being black and white.

Liberalism sure isn't built on any kind of intelligence

Looking at the Trump supporters - I don't think conservativism is either.

I'm not sure you are any different than I simply because you are choosing to vote for neither.

What do you make your choices on? Why do you vote for one candidate over another? Are you not voting? Are you voting third party? If so, how are you choosing your candidate? On the issues?

I'm voting for Johnson because I agree with him on the most issues. I think he sucks too. But Hillary and Trump suck because they don't respect the property of others. He sucks because he's only marginally sincere.

You are doing the same thing, you're just not honest about it. You make it sound like you are voting for Hillary because she's a better person than Trump. She's not. You can vote for her because you agree with her more, just say that and cut the crap that somehow agreeing with your socialist policies makes her a better person despite her despicable behavior in DC for decades

When it came to the issues I agreed with the Clinton the most - by a significant margin, Jill Stein to a lesser extent, and well below that Johnson. Trump at the bottom. I also think she is better qualified to lead and by far more stable. Not sure what "crap" you are talking about.

 

[Dot Com]

Donna Brazzil gives her questions in advance of debates. What does Hillary do? Refuse to accept them? Turn her in? Nope, she takes the questions and fine tunes the perfect answer. Cheater

Hillary colludes with the DNC to cheat Sanders out of a fair chance to compete in the primaries. Cheater

Hillary plants operatives in her town halls to ask preplanned questions that she has prepared for. Cheater


Hillary Clinton is a confirmed cheater that you are going to vote for. Explain that to your children & grandchildren.

This is true.

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

 

[kaz]

Committed a crime? Yes. Will be convicted? No

Awesome!! You all can't be wrong!

If a Republican set up their own server and routinely sent secret and top secret information exposing it to the Chinese, Russians and our other enemies, you would suddenly get it

Man...you sure do overstate with such ease. You are so hung up on the server as though she had it set up so she could break the law and harm America. She was trying to maintain her privacy. Bad decision. It is a negative.

The State Dept. server was actually compromised. You knew that didn't you?

I actually believe that many Republicans and many other Democrats have exposed "top secret" information to our enemies. But...as this is a thread about Hillary Clinton and Donna Brazille....I have no idea why I would post about it here.

She was trying to "maintain her privacy" on her government e-mail address? That's stupid even for you. Clearly what he was hiding was her behavior. For legitimate purposes, she was nailing a brad in with a sledge hammer.

You just aren't capable of questioning Democrats, are you? Just not wired that way

Incorrect. I've questioned her and found her decision to maintain a private server to be foolish and self serving. I've also found that she had no criminal intent. Nor did she profit in any way from this poor decision.

Now....do you believe me?

No, you're a partisan hack. If her intent was innocent, she would have used a private e-mail address. She clearly was presenting to people that this was coming from her official account. It's OBVIOUS that's intent, not just an innocent mistake.

Seriously, I've done two government consulting projects in my entire career, and I know more about government record keeping requirements than the First Lady / US Senator / Secretary of State claims to know. And you just write it off as a "poor decisions?"

And wow, did she ever profit using it as fundraising for the Clinton Foundation outside monitoring. Your story you buy it is just lame and you wouldn't remotely buy that from a Republican

 

[Coyote]

I preferred Sanders. But I support Clinton. She's highly qualified and capable.

Too bad she is likely going to jail.

Likely?

You playing stupid again today?

No, are you. You think obammy will pardon her?

I think he will. I think he'll say it needs to be done to let the country go on and pardon her. Ironically I don't think he'll do it for her. I think they do hate each other. But he will do it for his own legacy with Democrats who will resent his not cutting the noose for her

She hasn't even been charged with anything much tried and convicted.

 

[Dot Com]

candycorn running interference fpr the cheating crony. QUELLE SURPRISE..... NOT!!!

Brazile got fired from CNN over it

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

 

[Coyote]

If she got the questions in advance....it would be considered cheating. She would still get my vote. I'm confident that she knows
enough to do the job.

Agree...there is too much evidence a lack of integrity in Clinton that is dismaying. But she can do the job. Trump has too many more failings.

She has done such a fine job so far!

Unlike Trump, he's no billionaire... wait, I mean trillionaire.

Oh? He's released his taxes finally?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Awesome!! You all can't be wrong!

If a Republican set up their own server and routinely sent secret and top secret information exposing it to the Chinese, Russians and our other enemies, you would suddenly get it

Man...you sure do overstate with such ease. You are so hung up on the server as though she had it set up so she could break the law and harm America. She was trying to maintain her privacy. Bad decision. It is a negative.

The State Dept. server was actually compromised. You knew that didn't you?

I actually believe that many Republicans and many other Democrats have exposed "top secret" information to our enemies. But...as this is a thread about Hillary Clinton and Donna Brazille....I have no idea why I would post about it here.

She was trying to "maintain her privacy" on her government e-mail address? That's stupid even for you. Clearly what he was hiding was her behavior. For legitimate purposes, she was nailing a brad in with a sledge hammer.

You just aren't capable of questioning Democrats, are you? Just not wired that way

Incorrect. I've questioned her and found her decision to maintain a private server to be foolish and self serving. I've also found that she had no criminal intent. Nor did she profit in any way from this poor decision.

Now....do you believe me?

You found that she did not have criminal intent?

Are you an FBI agent? Even they couldn't say that.

That is my judgment. Have you found that she had criminal intent?

 

[kaz]

It's funny how you think that agreeing with your positions makes someone less scummy somehow

The quality of scummyness is multi-dimensional and issues (at least for me) play only a part in the overall Scum Rating.

How does it work for you? Does agreeing with The Donald make him less scummy than The Hillary?

Nope, they're both scummy, which is why I'm not voting for either of them. It's interesting to me that even though you know that, you actually like highlighting the black and white world you live in, while at the same time you criticize Republicans for being black and white.

Liberalism sure isn't built on any kind of intelligence

Looking at the Trump supporters - I don't think conservativism is either.

I'm not sure you are any different than I simply because you are choosing to vote for neither.

What do you make your choices on? Why do you vote for one candidate over another? Are you not voting? Are you voting third party? If so, how are you choosing your candidate? On the issues?

I'm voting for Johnson because I agree with him on the most issues. I think he sucks too. But Hillary and Trump suck because they don't respect the property of others. He sucks because he's only marginally sincere.

You are doing the same thing, you're just not honest about it. You make it sound like you are voting for Hillary because she's a better person than Trump. She's not. You can vote for her because you agree with her more, just say that and cut the crap that somehow agreeing with your socialist policies makes her a better person despite her despicable behavior in DC for decades

When it came to the issues I agreed with the Clinton the most - by a significant margin, Jill Stein to a lesser extent, and well below that Johnson. Trump at the bottom. I also think she is better qualified to lead and by far more stable. Not sure what "crap" you are talking about.

Jesus you people are thick. I'll highlight it for you

 

[kaz]

I preferred Sanders. But I support Clinton. She's highly qualified and capable.

Too bad she is likely going to jail.

Likely?

You playing stupid again today?

No, are you. You think obammy will pardon her?

I think he will. I think he'll say it needs to be done to let the country go on and pardon her. Ironically I don't think he'll do it for her. I think they do hate each other. But he will do it for his own legacy with Democrats who will resent his not cutting the noose for her

She hasn't even been charged with anything much tried and convicted.

True statement, nicely done. Not reading the discussion are you? We're specifically discussing if someone can be pardoned for something they haven't been charged with

 

[Coyote]

Who has your vote Norman?

I didn't vote. But I should definitely have voted for Trump, it's not even close. How has someone not figured this out yet?

I figured out the not even close part.

Good, now go vote for Trump... criminals belong in prison.

Good. Let's send The Donald to prison.

Orange Is The New Trump: GOP Nominee May Have Committed Crimes By Using Charity As Slush Fund
The Definitive Roundup of Trump’s Scandals and Business Failures

Let's deflect!

Nothing will come out of those lawsuits. Anyone can sue anyone.


Now, who is under criminal investigation by the FBI again?

Can you spell "hypocrisy"?

 

[007]

I preferred Sanders. But I support Clinton. She's highly qualified and capable.

Too bad she is likely going to jail.

Likely?

You playing stupid again today?

No, are you. You think obammy will pardon her?

I think he will. I think he'll say it needs to be done to let the country go on and pardon her. Ironically I don't think he'll do it for her. I think they do hate each other. But he will do it for his own legacy with Democrats who will resent his not cutting the noose for her

She hasn't even been charged with anything much tried and convicted.

Because ovomit and lynch and every other dem in power are protecting her, and therefore just as corrupt as she is.

The fact remains, she broke the law, many laws, and belongs in prison.

 

[kaz]

If a Republican set up their own server and routinely sent secret and top secret information exposing it to the Chinese, Russians and our other enemies, you would suddenly get it

Man...you sure do overstate with such ease. You are so hung up on the server as though she had it set up so she could break the law and harm America. She was trying to maintain her privacy. Bad decision. It is a negative.

The State Dept. server was actually compromised. You knew that didn't you?

I actually believe that many Republicans and many other Democrats have exposed "top secret" information to our enemies. But...as this is a thread about Hillary Clinton and Donna Brazille....I have no idea why I would post about it here.

She was trying to "maintain her privacy" on her government e-mail address? That's stupid even for you. Clearly what he was hiding was her behavior. For legitimate purposes, she was nailing a brad in with a sledge hammer.

You just aren't capable of questioning Democrats, are you? Just not wired that way

Incorrect. I've questioned her and found her decision to maintain a private server to be foolish and self serving. I've also found that she had no criminal intent. Nor did she profit in any way from this poor decision.

Now....do you believe me?

You found that she did not have criminal intent?

Are you an FBI agent? Even they couldn't say that.

That is my judgment. Have you found that she had criminal intent?

She went to extraordinary lengths to hide it from the people who would have told her she can't do that. She set up a server and went to all that effort for benefits which are so minor. I didn't want to carry two phones, so I set up an entire department to build an e-mail server, forward my official mail through it to hide what I was doing. Then I just innocently sold time slots to meet with me through it.

It was all innocent!

LoneLaughedAt. Shame on you, that was bad judgement! Let's forget it and move on now ...

 

[Dot Com]

She had to wonder where the question came from you crony Dem fluffrts. That makes her guilty

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

 

[Uncensored2008]

Willful ignorance! In Uncensored's case, not willful.

Again, no one believes you about anything.

Because you view "truth" as that which serves the party, nothing you post can be trusted.

Ever.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[


Can you spell "hypocrisy"?

Yes, it is spelled d e m o c r a t

 

[LoneLaugher]

Awesome!! You all can't be wrong!

If a Republican set up their own server and routinely sent secret and top secret information exposing it to the Chinese, Russians and our other enemies, you would suddenly get it

Man...you sure do overstate with such ease. You are so hung up on the server as though she had it set up so she could break the law and harm America. She was trying to maintain her privacy. Bad decision. It is a negative.

The State Dept. server was actually compromised. You knew that didn't you?

I actually believe that many Republicans and many other Democrats have exposed "top secret" information to our enemies. But...as this is a thread about Hillary Clinton and Donna Brazille....I have no idea why I would post about it here.

She was trying to "maintain her privacy" on her government e-mail address? That's stupid even for you. Clearly what he was hiding was her behavior. For legitimate purposes, she was nailing a brad in with a sledge hammer.

You just aren't capable of questioning Democrats, are you? Just not wired that way

Incorrect. I've questioned her and found her decision to maintain a private server to be foolish and self serving. I've also found that she had no criminal intent. Nor did she profit in any way from this poor decision.

Now....do you believe me?

No, you're a partisan hack. If her intent was innocent, she would have used a private e-mail address. She clearly was presenting to people that this was coming from her official account. It's OBVIOUS that's intent, not just an innocent mistake.

Seriously, I've done two government consulting projects in my entire career, and I know more about government record keeping requirements than the First Lady / US Senator / Secretary of State claims to know. And you just write it off as a "poor decisions?"

And wow, did she ever profit using it as fundraising for the Clinton Foundation outside monitoring. Your story you buy it is just lame and you wouldn't remotely buy that from a Republican

I have yet to be convinced that a single act of wrongdoing took place regarding the Clinton Foundation. As far as I am concerned, the foundation is a source of good in this world. You see it otherwise.

 

[Rozman]

Maybe all these charges against Hillary are just one big misunderstanding...
Nothing can make some people vote for the other guy.

 

[kaz]

If a Republican set up their own server and routinely sent secret and top secret information exposing it to the Chinese, Russians and our other enemies, you would suddenly get it

Man...you sure do overstate with such ease. You are so hung up on the server as though she had it set up so she could break the law and harm America. She was trying to maintain her privacy. Bad decision. It is a negative.

The State Dept. server was actually compromised. You knew that didn't you?

I actually believe that many Republicans and many other Democrats have exposed "top secret" information to our enemies. But...as this is a thread about Hillary Clinton and Donna Brazille....I have no idea why I would post about it here.

She was trying to "maintain her privacy" on her government e-mail address? That's stupid even for you. Clearly what he was hiding was her behavior. For legitimate purposes, she was nailing a brad in with a sledge hammer.

You just aren't capable of questioning Democrats, are you? Just not wired that way

Incorrect. I've questioned her and found her decision to maintain a private server to be foolish and self serving. I've also found that she had no criminal intent. Nor did she profit in any way from this poor decision.

Now....do you believe me?

No, you're a partisan hack. If her intent was innocent, she would have used a private e-mail address. She clearly was presenting to people that this was coming from her official account. It's OBVIOUS that's intent, not just an innocent mistake.

Seriously, I've done two government consulting projects in my entire career, and I know more about government record keeping requirements than the First Lady / US Senator / Secretary of State claims to know. And you just write it off as a "poor decisions?"

And wow, did she ever profit using it as fundraising for the Clinton Foundation outside monitoring. Your story you buy it is just lame and you wouldn't remotely buy that from a Republican

I have yet to be convinced that a single act of wrongdoing took place regarding the Clinton Foundation. As far as I am concerned, the foundation is a source of good in this world. You see it otherwise.

I have no idea about the foundation itself. However, fundraising should not involve a direct conflict of interest for her government positions. Again if it was a Republican, you'd suddenly get that

 

[LoneLaugher]

Man...you sure do overstate with such ease. You are so hung up on the server as though she had it set up so she could break the law and harm America. She was trying to maintain her privacy. Bad decision. It is a negative.

The State Dept. server was actually compromised. You knew that didn't you?

I actually believe that many Republicans and many other Democrats have exposed "top secret" information to our enemies. But...as this is a thread about Hillary Clinton and Donna Brazille....I have no idea why I would post about it here.

She was trying to "maintain her privacy" on her government e-mail address? That's stupid even for you. Clearly what he was hiding was her behavior. For legitimate purposes, she was nailing a brad in with a sledge hammer.

You just aren't capable of questioning Democrats, are you? Just not wired that way

Incorrect. I've questioned her and found her decision to maintain a private server to be foolish and self serving. I've also found that she had no criminal intent. Nor did she profit in any way from this poor decision.

Now....do you believe me?

No, you're a partisan hack. If her intent was innocent, she would have used a private e-mail address. She clearly was presenting to people that this was coming from her official account. It's OBVIOUS that's intent, not just an innocent mistake.

Seriously, I've done two government consulting projects in my entire career, and I know more about government record keeping requirements than the First Lady / US Senator / Secretary of State claims to know. And you just write it off as a "poor decisions?"

And wow, did she ever profit using it as fundraising for the Clinton Foundation outside monitoring. Your story you buy it is just lame and you wouldn't remotely buy that from a Republican

I have yet to be convinced that a single act of wrongdoing took place regarding the Clinton Foundation. As far as I am concerned, the foundation is a source of good in this world. You see it otherwise.

I have no idea about the foundation itself. However, fundraising should not involve a direct conflict of interest for her government positions. Again if it was a Republican, you'd suddenly get that

Incorrect. I have never...and would never...criticize a republican who used his or her position of influence to raise funds which go to saving lives around the world.

Next bullshit assertion, please.

 

[Syriusly]

Donna Brazzil gives her questions in advance of debates. What does Hillary do? Refuse to accept them? Turn her in? Nope, she takes the questions and fine tunes the perfect answer. Cheater

Hillary colludes with the DNC to cheat Sanders out of a fair chance to compete in the primaries. Cheater

Hillary plants operatives in her town halls to ask preplanned questions that she has prepared for. Cheater


Hillary Clinton is a confirmed cheater that you are going to vote for. Explain that to your children & grandchildren.

Donald Trump cheated on his wife.

Explain that to your children and grandchildren.