High school track has changed. Runner attacked!

Raw numbers, or per capita?

Do you know the difference?

The per capita argument is a red herring fallacy​

Discussion

I want to discuss the fallacy of the per capita argument being applied incorrectly to many common modern talking points and issues today. Let’s take crime for example as one of the most major issues this red herring is applied to.

According to the FBI database white people make up about 70% of the criminal population in America while black people make up about 27% of the criminal population. However when talking about crime, black people are usually listed as the most major contributors to the crime problem in America. The argument is usually based on the calculation of per capita the population and ratios at who is committing the crimes.

The problem with the per capita argument as it’s presented in this very specific example is that it’s a red herring fallacy. An irrelevant point that shifts the blame from the most major contributing factor of all crimes which is the white population. It’s a way to minimize the actual main problem of white crime by shifting the blame to a “per capita” argument.
 
Not necessarily. Making a false claim like a whiplash claim is fraud.
Hitting someone with an innocent object is not always assault. That’s a stretch. These batons are very lightweight, almost as safe as children’s toys.
This is something that should be handled by track meet and scholastic sports officials.
How do you know it’s a false claim? The shock of being hit over the head with an object could well have made her twist her head quickly and cause whiplash.

And at the minimum, even if not assault, it’s unacceptable behavior in a competition and the perpetrator should be prohibited from sports for the remainder of her high school years.
 
That makes your racist ass feel good doesn't it. You've been wanting to post that for a long time.
He does bring up a good point, though. If the n-word is so loaded with racist contempt, why are blacks using it on each other?

I guarantee you will never hear one Jew call another Jew the k-word.
 
How do you know it’s a false claim? The shock of being hit over the head with an object could well have made her twist her head quickly and cause whiplash.

And at the minimum, even if not assault, it’s unacceptable behavior in a competition and the perpetrator should be prohibited from sports for the remainder of her high school years.
The video wasn’t terribly clear and there seemed to be a significant delay between the strike and the reaction.
Again, it’s very difficult to injure anyone — even intentionally -- with one of these batons. They’re harmless. I coached HS track, indoor, outdoor and cross country for ten years. I’ve been involved with track and field since the 1960’s. I’ve seen the gear and facilities evolve over the decades, mostly in the name of safety and also for performance enhancement.
Your last paragraph underscores my take on this; let the rules committees and schools dole out any punishment, not the law. This entire incident is way overblown.
 
I was just about the post the same thing, and to ask what her punishment should be.
IMO, this violent girl should be banned from ALL sports (not just track) for the remainder of her high school career - thus killing any chance of an athletic scholarship for college. She should also be required to get an after-school job at Target, Mcadonald’s, wherever - and have her earnings go to her victim’s medical expenses.

I gotta say, I think it is the victim girl's fault.

Had she been a transfemale, she could have withstood the attack,
taken the baton off the attacker and beaten the crap out of her. :shok:

Yep, we need more transwomen in female sports. Ordinary girls are just not up to the task of competing in female sports. :eusa_whistle:
 
because they act like the white violent people who are the majority.

The majority of white people aren't violent. They are acting like the minority portion of the majority race in this country.

Whites don't have a damn thing due to merit.

Wow, how ignorant are you? My wife is a good example. She is white, but grew up in a very poor, first generation immigrant household. Do you think she got good grades because of her race or because of hard work and intelligence? Do you think she got into medical school because of her race? Quite the opposite, it was DESPITE her race. Do you think being white helped her graduate? How about passing her medical boards?

You are very misinformed.
 
What a psychopath!

The attacker should be in jail!


High school track has changed. Runner attacked!​

You racists always have something to say unti the same thing is done by whites. Then you have excuses.
 
The majority of white people aren't violent. They are acting like the minority portion of the majority race in this country.



Wow, how ignorant are you? My wife is a good example. She is white, but grew up in a very poor, first generation immigrant household. Do you think she got good grades because of her race or because of hard work and intelligence? Do you think she got into medical school because of her race? Quite the opposite, it was DESPITE her race. Do you think being white helped her graduate? How about passing her medical boards?

You are very misinformed.
How ignorant are you? White women were the number one beneficiaries of affirmative action and the number one beneficiaries of DEI. White men such as you simply need STHU about merit because you have NOTHING because of merit.

Blacks go to college, get good grades but you punk ass racists want talk about how we are given everything because of race. The reality you just have to face white man, is that you whites made the laws and policies that provided whites with racial preferences and that's why whites have most of what they do. That's what history shows son, so you don't get to lie to me about merit.
 
Last edited:
White women were the number one beneficiaries of affirmative action and the number one beneficiaries of DEI.

Um, my wife's roommate in college was a black female. She majored in one of my wife's TWO majors with a lower GPA and substantially lower MCAT score. She was admitted while my wife was wait listed at a medical school. You are incorrect.

White men such as you simply need STHU about merit because you have NOTHING because of merit.

My position in life has NOTHING to do with my skin color. I wasn't hired because of it, in fact, an African American was hired in the same group as myself by the same hiring manager. I didn't matriculate up the ladder because of it. I work hard and stayed late. I put in extra effort to get to where I am today. You don't have a clue what you are talking about.

It is hilarious how you don't believe we know what it is like to walk in a black person's shoes, but you know all to well how it is to walk in a white person's. Ridiculous.
 
Um, my wife's roommate in college was a black female. She majored in one of my wife's TWO majors with a lower GPA and substantially lower MCAT score. She was admitted while my wife was wait listed at a medical school. You are incorrect.



My position in life has NOTHING to do with my skin color. I wasn't hired because of it, in fact, an African American was hired in the same group as myself by the same hiring manager. I didn't matriculate up the ladder because of it. I work hard and stayed late. I put in extra effort to get to where I am today. You don't have a clue what you are talking about.

It is hilarious how you don't believe we know what it is like to walk in a black person's shoes, but you know all to well how it is to walk in a white person's. Ridiculous.
True. My college boyfriend had a 3.6 and decent but not great MCAT score, and he was rejected from every medical school he applied to. (White boys don’t get into med school with a 3.6.) His best friend was black, and had a lower GPA and worse MCAT. He received multiple acceptances.
 
Um, my wife's roommate in college was a black female. She majored in one of my wife's TWO majors with a lower GPA and substantially lower MCAT score. She was admitted while my wife was wait listed at a medical school. You are incorrect.



My position in life has NOTHING to do with my skin color. I wasn't hired because of it, in fact, an African American was hired in the same group as myself by the same hiring manager. I didn't matriculate up the ladder because of it. I work hard and stayed late. I put in extra effort to get to where I am today. You don't have a clue what you are talking about.

It is hilarious how you don't believe we know what it is like to walk in a black person's shoes, but you know all to well how it is to walk in a white person's. Ridiculous.
P.S. IM2 claims every white who achieved whatever they did was due to their race - which is pure racism.
 
Um, my wife's roommate in college was a black female. She majored in one of my wife's TWO majors with a lower GPA and substantially lower MCAT score. She was admitted while my wife was wait listed at a medical school. You are incorrect.



My position in life has NOTHING to do with my skin color. I wasn't hired because of it, in fact, an African American was hired in the same group as myself by the same hiring manager. I didn't matriculate up the ladder because of it. I work hard and stayed late. I put in extra effort to get to where I am today. You don't have a clue what you are talking about.

It is hilarious how you don't believe we know what it is like to walk in a black person's shoes, but you know all to well how it is to walk in a white person's. Ridiculous.
Yeah, here we have another sad white tale. White women WERE the number 1 recipient of DEI nd Affirmative Action. That is a fact. If what happened to your wife is true, it is because the university had been practicing racial discrimination and got caught. OK, white man, you can quit trying to tell me how your skin color has nothing to do with what you have. And just because someone black was hired in the some place doesn't mean that your race was not a consideration. If skin color was irrelevant to you, I doubt you would be in here whining bout race as if whites have been treated unfairly because you would clearly understand that whites have been, and continue to be, given preferences in this country based only on their race that has created he situation we have today. And if you had thoughts of fairness instead of white supremacy, you understand that damage created by color-coded policies favoring whites can't be undone by simply claiming that everybody must now turn color blind.

So what your argument boils down to is that you are white and you want things to remain the same whereby whites continue getting all the advantages. Your argument isn't about merit, because merit has never been a consideration and if we started today doing things only because of merit, nothing changes. Whites still have advantages based on race because they are in positions and have experience because they were put in those positions only because of their race.

Last, hilarious is how whites who have not had any real serious consistent contact with blacks think they can speak as experts about blacks, while blacks who are outnumbered 5:1 by whites and have constant exposure to whites can't learn about whites even as we are educated to learn white history, white philosophy, white religious views, white sociology, white politics and opinions, etc.
 

The per capita argument is a red herring fallacy​

Discussion

I want to discuss the fallacy of the per capita argument being applied incorrectly to many common modern talking points and issues today. Let’s take crime for example as one of the most major issues this red herring is applied to.

According to the FBI database white people make up about 70% of the criminal population in America while black people make up about 27% of the criminal population. However when talking about crime, black people are usually listed as the most major contributors to the crime problem in America. The argument is usually based on the calculation of per capita the population and ratios at who is committing the crimes.

The problem with the per capita argument as it’s presented in this very specific example is that it’s a red herring fallacy. An irrelevant point that shifts the blame from the most major contributing factor of all crimes which is the white population. It’s a way to minimize the actual main problem of white crime by shifting the blame to a “per capita” argument.

Yep. We have been saying that in here for years.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom