High School Physics solve 9/11

[DiveCon]

he's comparing to WTC7
47 stories
but, still of different construction
the Mandarin building had a concrete core

You keep saying that but I notice you keep not supplying a link to support the CLAIM.

psik

are you fucking blind?
links have been provided

look in the quote in post 516

 

[SFC Ollie]

The Chinese building was similar to WTC7. It was similar in size and was not hit by an airliner. But it had a bigger fire that lasted longer and DID NOT COLLAPSE.

So where is your link indicating that it had a concrete core. YOU made the stetement!

psik

Truth is that the Mandarin Hotel was only about 50 stories tall, no real comparison to the twin towers.

he's comparing to WTC7
47 stories
but, still of different construction
the Mandarin building had a concrete core

Still no comparison.

"Hotspots are still visible but much of the fire had been extinguished within three hours."

Beijing's Mandarin Oriental Hotel Burns After Fireworks Show

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Still waiting to hear the audio tape that captured the actual explosions that brought these buildings down. It should sound something like this:
YouTube - coolest building implosion

Instead we heard this:

YouTube - 2nd Plane WTC

Hey Gomer, still want to make yourself look like an idiot ignoring witness testimonys including firemen,scientists,architects,engineers,and demolition experts? for the hundreth time,according to YOUR logic,if the governments version is correct,then the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years no longer apples anymore. and that doesnt counter anything I said in my long post, which of course is typical for you.

Hundreds of video recorders and audio recorders within hearing distance, many of them operated by professional news crews when the towers fell. And we don't hear any controlled demolition explosions. Not on even one of those tapes. Yes there is the occasional secondary explosion as in any major office building fire, but those didn't bring the towers down. Now have you any physical evidence of planted explosions?

nice dodge Gomer.Been taking leesons on Fizzbitch on how to dodge points I see.great job of teaching you on that he did for you.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

High school level Physics calculations show Gravity on the World Trade Center Towers was 0.1 KiloTons of TNT-equivalent energy in "action".

The debris and dust erupted over 8.5 KiloTons of 'TNT' energy in "reaction".

FACT: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
0.1 KT ACTION does not equal 8.5 KT REACTION
http://Newton's_laws_of_motion

When the top chunk of Mt. St. Helens turned into a cloud of dust, thrown on the landscape, the TV and newspapers said the mountain expended the energy equivalent of 30,000 K Tons of TNT.

How did they know that number?
Were there conflicting opinions?
Was it a debateable issue whether it was 40,000 KT or 10,000 KT of TNT equivalent energy?

No, it was 30,000 KT, no argument, no debate....the number is not an opinion, it's a calculation of a fact.

Like an Example problem in Physics homework, multiply the massive weight of the rock times how far it flew against gravity's energy forcing it down to the ground. Weight x distance x gravity, is the energy number......the math is done......easy as pie.

The same calculation makes a fact that 8.5 KT of energy force expanded the dust cloud of pulverized concrete which came out of each Twin Tower on 9/11 and spread across Manhattan's buildings and streets an inch thick, or more.

8.5 KT of expended energy, is the number which American Corporate Media does NOT say, because it's censored, prohibited, since there's a mystery about where that energy came from. Since 0.1 KT, is all the energy that gravity had, forcing down on each building.

Gravity smacking the floors together, one-by-one flattening them like pancakes....or 110 floors pushed down into a stack on ground level, where gravity can't push any farther.

Multiply all the weight that came down the distance to the ground, and the fact is 0.1 KT of TNT equivalent energy was expended. That's all there possibly was. If a Tower weighed twice as much, there was 0.2 KT of energy in it. If it weighed twice as much being twice as tall, then 0.4 KT of energy was in it at all times.

Whether the building is on fire or not, it weighs the same and stands as tall, until gravity, not fire, starts into action.

Same as if you have a book on the table, and you push it off the edge so it drops on a weight scale. When it hits the scale, it scores the same (energy) force of gravity pushing its fall, every time, whether or not the book is on fire. Instead of a book, if you use a balloon full of water, the force measured when it falls down on the scale is the same, every time, whether the water is liquid or solid ice. And, if you know how tall the table is, and you know the weight of the book or water balloon, you can calculate the pounds of force the scale is going to show under the falling object and have that answer before you push the weight off the table.

It's not an "opinion," it's a calculation, it's a fact.

Each Twin Tower dust cloud measured 8.5 KT of (energy) force spreading out of the building. But only 0.1 KT of gravity pushed each building, straight down. This Action is NOT equal Reaction and was as if you dropped a 1 Ton book off the table and the scale measured 85 Tons hit it.

The mystery of where the extra energy force came from, measured on 9/11, is an unsolved mystery.

American Corporate News has the factual calculation of the explosive equivalent energy number, the same place they got it for Mt. St. Helens.....so what is the difference with our Media Today?

Looks like highschool science wont be able to develope a drug to treat your case of mental retardation

nice dodge frady cat Bush dupe.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Source for how many recording devices were in the area when the towers went down? Are you shitting me? If there weren't hundreds I would have to wonder why not. We are talking the largest news story in decades, And in the center of Manhattan. 10's of thousands (if not 100's of thousands) of people and every newsman who could get there. You sure you can't figure this out on your own?

so you just made these facts up..

So you are too stupid to figure this out?

yes you are stupid and obviously slept through science classes your whole life.

 

[DiveCon]

so you just made these facts up..

So you are too stupid to figure this out?

yes you are stupid and obviously slept through science classes your whole life.

gee, projection from a fucking moronic troofer

whooda guessed

 

[eots]

Source for how many recording devices were in the area when the towers went down? Are you shitting me? If there weren't hundreds I would have to wonder why not. We are talking the largest news story in decades, And in the center of Manhattan. 10's of thousands (if not 100's of thousands) of people and every newsman who could get there. You sure you can't figure this out on your own?

so you just made these facts up..

So you are too stupid to figure this out?

you did not figure anything out ..you made a baseless assumption you that presented as fact

 

[DiveCon]

so you just made these facts up..

So you are too stupid to figure this out?

you did not figure anything out ..you made a baseless assumption you that presented as fact

gee, NYC is basically the media capital of the world, plus many tourists with video cams on a daily basis, but not one person has an undoctored video with the sounds of an implosion???????

 

[SFC Ollie]

Hey Gomer, still want to make yourself look like an idiot ignoring witness testimonys including firemen,scientists,architects,engineers,and demolition experts? for the hundreth time,according to YOUR logic,if the governments version is correct,then the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years no longer apples anymore. and that doesnt counter anything I said in my long post, which of course is typical for you.

Hundreds of video recorders and audio recorders within hearing distance, many of them operated by professional news crews when the towers fell. And we don't hear any controlled demolition explosions. Not on even one of those tapes. Yes there is the occasional secondary explosion as in any major office building fire, but those didn't bring the towers down. Now have you any physical evidence of planted explosions?

nice dodge Gomer.Been taking leesons on Fizzbitch on how to dodge points I see.great job of teaching you on that he did for you.

And you still cannot show any audio of what could be remotely called a controlled demolition. Do play again sometime.

 

[SFC Ollie]

So you are too stupid to figure this out?

you did not figure anything out ..you made a baseless assumption you that presented as fact

gee, NYC is basically the media capital of the world, plus many tourists with video cams on a daily basis, but not one person has an undoctored video with the sounds of an implosion???????

And we aren't smart enough to figure out there had to be hundreds of recodings being made that day...

 

[DiveCon]

you did not figure anything out ..you made a baseless assumption you that presented as fact

gee, NYC is basically the media capital of the world, plus many tourists with video cams on a daily basis, but not one person has an undoctored video with the sounds of an implosion???????

And we aren't smart enough to figure out there had to be hundreds of recodings being made that day...

everyone that owned a camera that day more than likely had it going and pointed at the WTC
might have been a few that didnt have a chance to get to theirs(at work and camera at home, etc)

 

[SFC Ollie]

gee, NYC is basically the media capital of the world, plus many tourists with video cams on a daily basis, but not one person has an undoctored video with the sounds of an implosion???????

And we aren't smart enough to figure out there had to be hundreds of recodings being made that day...

everyone that owned a camera that day more than likely had it going and pointed at the WTC
might have been a few that didnt have a chance to get to theirs(at work and camera at home, etc)

And not one of them recorded anything that could be called the sound of a controlled demolition. These fools are too easy.

 

[eots]

And we aren't smart enough to figure out there had to be hundreds of recodings being made that day...

everyone that owned a camera that day more than likely had it going and pointed at the WTC
might have been a few that didnt have a chance to get to theirs(at work and camera at home, etc)

And not one of them recorded anything that could be called the sound of a controlled demolition. These fools are too easy.

there are a handful of tapes of the collapse..and the sounds you speak of are that of a normal controlled demolition

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALbkzSGvmLM]YouTube - EXPLOSIVES going off in WTC CLEAR AUDIO! 911 Demolition[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

everyone that owned a camera that day more than likely had it going and pointed at the WTC
might have been a few that didnt have a chance to get to theirs(at work and camera at home, etc)

And not one of them recorded anything that could be called the sound of a controlled demolition. These fools are too easy.

there are a handful of tapes of the collapse..and the sounds you speak of are that of a normal controlled demolition

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALbkzSGvmLM]YouTube - EXPLOSIVES going off in WTC CLEAR AUDIO! 911 Demolition[/ame]

doctored video

 

[SFC Ollie]

That's funny, a handful of tapes....LOL in one of the largest cities in the world during something as monumental as the attacks on 9-11-01. that's really rich. LOL Where do you come up with this funny shit?

Please tell us all where you are doing the rest of your standup act so we can miss it.

 

[eots]

And not one of them recorded anything that could be called the sound of a controlled demolition. These fools are too easy.

there are a handful of tapes of the collapse..and the sounds you speak of are that of a normal controlled demolition

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALbkzSGvmLM]YouTube - EXPLOSIVES going off in WTC CLEAR AUDIO! 911 Demolition[/ame]

doctored video

proof ?

 

[eots]

That's funny, a handful of tapes....LOL in one of the largest cities in the world during something as monumental as the attacks on 9-11-01. that's really rich. LOL Where do you come up with this funny shit?

Please tell us all where you are doing the rest of your standup act so we can miss it.

take a look at youtube or any of the many documentary films of 9/11..there are the same half dozens videos of the collapse..end of story lil Ollie

 

[DiveCon]

there are a handful of tapes of the collapse..and the sounds you speak of are that of a normal controlled demolition

YouTube - EXPLOSIVES going off in WTC CLEAR AUDIO! 911 Demolition

doctored video

proof ?

when you hear the so called demo explosions, you lose all the crowd noise and the sounds of the sirens
that is CLEARLY a doctored video

 

[eots]

doctored video

proof ?

when you hear the so called demo explosions, you lose all the crowd noise and the sounds of the sirens
that is CLEARLY a doctored video

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMUbbLYycVo]YouTube - 9/11 Port Authority cop heard explosion before WTC collapse[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

proof ?

when you hear the so called demo explosions, you lose all the crowd noise and the sounds of the sirens
that is CLEARLY a doctored video

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMUbbLYycVo]YouTube - 9/11 Port Authority cop heard explosion before WTC collapse[/ame]

again, hearing an explosive sound is not proof of explosives
a lot of things can explode in an office fire